Covariance structures analysis is often used in nursing research to appraise statistical models reflecting complex human health processes. The model selection approach in covariance structures analysis is designed to select the "best" model from a specified set of theoretically defensible, competing alternatives, all of which are viewed as approximations. Model selection criteria explicitly incorporate both model misfit in the population and sampling error to evaluate the set of models. The result is that interpretability of modelparameters and goodness-of-fit are enhanced simultaneously. Relative merits of the model selection approach are identified in light of technical concerns, parsimony, and use of scientific theory in nursing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzen, I. , & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
3.
Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDPSoftware.
4.
Bentler, P. M. , & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
5.
Bender, P M. , & Chou, C.-P. (1993). Some new covariance structure model improvement statistics. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 235-255). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
7.
Browne, M. W. (1982). Covariance structures. In D. M. Hawkins (Ed.), Topics in applied multivariate analysis (pp. 72-141). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Browne, M. W. , & Arminger, G. (1995). Specification and estimation of mean-and covariance-structure models. In G. Anninger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 185-249). New York: Plenum.
9.
Browne, M. W. , & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445-455.
10.
Browne, M. W. , & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Cudeck, R. (1989). Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317-327.
12.
Cudeck, R. , & Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147-167.
13.
Cudeck, R. , & Henly, S. J. (1991). Model selection in covariance structure analysis and the "problem" of sample size: A clarification. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 512-519.
14.
Downs, F. (1996). On clinical interpretations of research findings. Nursing Research, 45, 195-195.
15.
Duckett, L. , Henly, S., Avery, M., Potter, S., Hills-Bonczyk, S., Hulden, R., & Savik, K. (in press). A theory of planned behavior-based structural model for breastfeeding. Nursing Research
16.
Eklund, R. , Whitehead, J., & Welk, G. J. (1997). Validity of the Children and Youth Physical Self-Perception Profile: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterlyfor Exercise and Sport, 68, 249-256.
17.
Foreman, M. (1993). Acute confusional states. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 11, 3-30.
18.
Geisser, S. (1980). Apredictivistic primer. In A. Zellner(Ed.), Bayesian analysis in econometrics and statistics (pp. 363-381). Amsterdam: North Holland.
19.
Henly, S. J. (1994, June 23-27). Psychometrics and the discipline of nursing. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society, Annual Meeting, Champaign, IL.
20.
Henly, S. J. , Klebe, K. J., McBride, J., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Adaptive and conventional versions of the DAT: The first complete test battery comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 363-371.
21.
Hoyle, R. , & Panter, A. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Joreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 43, 443-447.
23.
Joreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Joreskog, K. G. , & Sorbom, D. (1989). PC-LISREL7. Moorseville, IN: Scientific Software.
25.
Linhart, H. , & Zucchini, W. (1986). Model selection. New York: John Wiley.
26.
Marsh, H. , Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
27.
Shao, J. (1996). Bootstrapping model selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 655-665.
28.
Steiger, J. , Shapiro, A., & Browne, M. (1985). On the multivariate, asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika, 50, 253-263.
29.
Tremblay, P. F. , & Gardner, R. C. (1996). On the growth of structural equation modeling in psychological journals. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 93-104.
30.
Vermeersch, P.E.H. (1990). The Clinical Assessment of Confusion-A. Applied Nursing Research, 3, 128-133.
31.
Vermeersch, P.E.H. , & Henly, S. J. (1997). Validation of the structure for the "Clinical Assessment of Confusion-A."Nursing Research, 46, 208-213.
