Urinary incontinence (UI) affects over half of adult women in the United States and negatively impacts physical and psychological health. Our understanding of UI self-management is limited to older, urban women despite the prevalence of UI in all women, particularly during the midlife period.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to examine how contextual factors influence UI self-management behaviors of rural, midlife women with UI.
Methods:
A convergent, mixed-methods study was conducted with 31 rural women aged 30-60 years who were recruited via social media. Participants completed a demographics questionnaire, individual interview, and questionnaires to assess contextual factors: UI subtype, incontinence severity, access to care, and quality of life (QOL) impact. Analyses included qualitative description, descriptive statistics and correlations, and data integration to assess for convergence.
Results:
Qualitative interview results have been published. The strongest correlation was seen between incontinence severity and QOL impact. Significant correlations were found between postmenopausal status, UI subtype, incontinence severity, and QOL impact. Integration of qualitative and quantitative data revealed difference between incontinence severity and the qualitative themes self-management behaviors and medical encounters. As incontinence severity increased, the intensity of self-management behaviors increased. Lacking knowledge about symptom reduction and providers’ fatalistic attitudes were barriers to improving UI self-management in this rural sample.
Conclusion:
Findings demonstrate a need for specific health care educational resources and supportive interactions to reduce the QOL impact of UI in rural midlife women.
PatelUJGodeckerALGilesDLBrownHW.Updated prevalence of urinary incontinence in women: 2015-2018 National population-based survey data. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022;28(4):181-187. doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000001127
2.
HaylenBTde RidderDFreemanRM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5-26. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9
3.
Pintos-DíazMZAlonso-BlancoCParás-BravoP, et al. Living with urinary incontinence: potential risks of women’s health? A qualitative study on the perspectives of female patients seeking care for the first time in a specialized center. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3781. doi:10.3390/ijerph16193781
4.
AlQuaizAMKaziAAlYousefiNAlwatbanLAlHabibYTurkistaniI.Urinary incontinence affects the quality of life and increases psychological distress and low self-esteem. Healthcare. 2023;11(12):1772. doi:10.3390/healthcare11121772
5.
SaikiLSMeize-GrochowskiR.Relationship satisfaction of intimate partners of persons living with urinary incontinence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019;46(3):228-234. doi:10.1097/won.0000000000000537
6.
Dereli YilmazSErkal AksoyY. Urinary incontinence in Turkish women: a qualitative study on daily life and sexual health. J Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurs. 2023;50(1):66-71. doi:10.1097/WON.0000000000000928
7.
SarikayaSYildizFGSenocakCBozkurtOFKaratasOF.Urinary incontinence as a cause of depression and sexual dysfunction: Questionnaire-based study. Rev Int Androl. 2020;18(2):50-54. doi:10.1016/j.androl.2018.08.003
8.
FeldeGBjellandIHunskaarS.Anxiety and depression associated with incontinence in middle-aged women: a large Norwegian cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(3):299-306. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1564-3
9.
SawettikampornWSarit-ApirakSManonaiJ.Attitudes and barriers to pelvic floor muscle exercises of women with stress urinary incontinence. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):477. doi:10.1186/s12905-022-02067-4
10.
SilvaEPMBorimFSABianchiMYassudaMSNeriALBatistoniSST. Urinary incontinence, sense of control/autonomy and social participation in community-dwelling older adults. Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia. 2022;25(5):e210207. doi:10.1590/1981-22562022025.210207.en
11.
LeungWKCCheungJWongVCC, et al. Patterns of sedentary behavior among older women with urinary incontinence and urinary symptoms: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1201. doi:10.1186/s12889-024-18703-7
12.
AbushammaFMansourANassarR, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and impact on quality of life due to urinary incontinence among Palestinian women: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e57813. doi:10.7759/cureus.57813
13.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 155. Urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):e66-81. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001148
14.
GoforthJLangakerM.Urinary incontinence in women. N C Med J. 2016;77(6):423-425. doi:10.18043/ncm.77.6.423
15.
PanLCDatarMMcKinneyJLKeyserLEGossTFPulliamSJ.Adherence to professional society guidelines among women with stress or mixed urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(6):1489-1497. doi:10.1002/nau.24986
16.
CharetteMPacheco-BrousseauLPoitrasSAshtonRMcLeanL.Management of urinary incontinence in females by primary care providers: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2024;133(5):498-512. doi:10.1111/bju.16234
17.
Rashidi FakariFHajianSDarvishSAlavi MajdH. Explaining factors affecting help-seeking behaviors in women with urinary incontinence: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):60. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-06047-y
18.
O’ReillyNNelsonHDConryJM, et al. Screening for urinary incontinence in women: a recommendation from the Women’s Preventive Services Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(5):320-328. doi:10.7326/M18-0595
19.
ShaughnessyAF.Guideline, with no evidence, suggests annual screening for urinary incontinence in women. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(7):459.
20.
Moossdorff-SteinhauserHFABerghmansBCMSpaandermanMEABolsEMJ. Urinary incontinence 6 weeks to 1 year post-partum: prevalence, experience of bother, beliefs, and help-seeking behavior. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1817-1824. doi:10.1007/s00192-020-04644-3
21.
Diez-ItzaIZubikaraiMGalanCGintoLSaroJArrueM.Factors involved in the persistence of stress urinary incontinence from postpartum to 12 years after first delivery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(6):1849-1855. doi:10.1002/nau.24442
22.
González-ArboledaAAArias-CastilloLGarcía-PerdomoHA.Urologic perspective of genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Int J Urol Nurs. 2024;18(1):e12388. doi:10.1111/ijun.12388
23.
LegendreGFritelXPanjoHZinsMRingaV.Incidence and remission of stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence in midlife and older women: A longitudinal cohort study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(2):650-657. doi:10.1002/nau.24237
24.
ThangarajahFHartmann-WobbeJRatiuD, et al. The onset of urinary incontinence in different subgroups and its relation to menopausal status: A Hospital-based Study. In Vivo. 2020;34(2):923-928. doi:10.21873/invivo.11859
25.
KleinAJEisenhauerCMollardEShadeMYAlappattuM.Methodologies used in studies of self-management interventions for urinary incontinence in adult women: an integrative review. West J Nurs Res. 2023;45(12):1150-1164. doi:10.1177/01939459231208418
26.
PalmerMHCockerellRGrieblingTLRantellAvan HoutenPNewmanDK.Review of the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence: primary prevention of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(1):66-72. doi:10.1002/nau.24222
27.
RyanPSawinKJ.The individual and family self-management theory: background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nurs Outlook. 2009;57(4):217-225.e216. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004
KleinAJEisenhauerCMollardE, et al. “The constant worry”: Urinary incontinence self-management in rural women: a qualitative study. Res Nurs Health. 2023;46(6):603-615. doi:10.1002/nur.22341
AppletonJVKingL.Constructivism: a naturalistic methodology for nursing inquiry. Adv Nurs Sci. 1997;20(2):13-22. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199712000-00003
32.
PalinkasLAHorwitzSMGreenCAWisdomJPDuanNHoagwoodK.Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533-544. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
33.
MalterudKSiersmaVDGuassoraAD.Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753-1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444
BradleyCSRovnerESMorganMA, et al. A new questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis in women: development and testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(1):66-73. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.037
36.
SandvikHEspunaMHunskaarS.Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(5):520-524. doi:10.1007/s00192-005-0060-z
37.
SandvikHSeimAVanvikAHunskaarS.A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: comparison with 48-hour pad-weighing tests. Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19(2):137-145. doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(2000)19:2<137::aid-nau4>3.0.co;2-g
38.
HanleyJCapewellAHagenS.Validity study of the severity index, a simple measure of urinary incontinence in women. BMJ. 2001;322(7294):1096-1097. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1096
39.
CunninghamWEHaysRDWilliamsKWBeckKCDixonWJShapiroMF.Access to medical care and health-related quality of life for low-income persons with symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus. Med Care. 1995;33(7):739-754. doi:10.1097/00005650-199507000-00009
40.
WebelARAsherACucaY, et al. Measuring HIV self-management in women living with HIV/AIDS: a psychometric evaluation study of the HIV Self-management Scale. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;60(3):e72-81. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e318256623d
41.
AveryKDonovanJPetersTJShawCGotohMAbramsP.ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322-330. doi: 10.1002/nau.20041
42.
VarpioLAjjawiRMonrouxeLVO’BrienBCReesCE.Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017;51(1):40-50. doi:10.1111/medu.13124
43.
DempseyLDowlingMLarkinPMurphyK.Sensitive interviewing in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 2016;39(6):480-490. doi:10.1002/nur.21743
44.
GuettermanTCFettersMDCreswellJW.Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(6):554-561. doi:10.1370/afm.1865
45.
AlizadehAMontazeriMShabaniF, et al. Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and associated factors in Iranian postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):18. doi:10.1186/s12894-023-01186-w
46.
WoodsNFMitchellES.The Seattle midlife women’s health study: a longitudinal prospective study of women during the menopausal transition and early postmenopause. Womens Midlife Health. 2016;2:6. doi:10.1186/s40695-016-0019-x
47.
MishraGDCardozoLKuhD.Menopausal transition and the risk of urinary incontinence: results from a British prospective cohort. BJU Int. 2010;106(8):1170-1175. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09321.x
48.
SalmonVEHay-SmithEJCJarvieR, et al. Implementing pelvic floor muscle training in women’s childbearing years: a critical interpretive synthesis of individual, professional, and service issues. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(2):863-870. doi:10.1002/nau.24256
49.
SoundararajanKDilruksha ChandrasiriMBalchandraP.Staff awareness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in tertiary care—a qualitative cross-sectional study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(6):2282-2286. doi:10.1080/01443615.2022.2040966
50.
StatzMEversK.Spatial barriers as moral failings: What rural distance can teach us about women’s health and medical mistrust author names and affiliations. Health Place. 2020;64:102396. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102396
51.
ArumaJ-FHearnMBernacchiVMossJL.Examining the roles of travel distance, medical mistrust, and cancer fatalism in the uptake of clinical cancer prevention among women in rural and urban US communities: A secondary data analysis. Prev Med Rep. 2024;38:102611. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102611
52.
SürücüLMaslakciA.Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Bus Manag Studies Int J. 2020;8(3):2694-2726. doi:10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
53.
PenchanskyRThomasJW.The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care. 1981;19(2):127–140. doi:10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001
