Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction:

Midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause experience a complex array of symptoms. However, there is conflicting evidence on how their symptom experiences differ by menopausal stage. Current studies have not examined the interconnected relationship among menopausal symptoms and understood how this relationship may differ based on the menopausal stage.

Methods:

This is a secondary data analysis using cross-sectional data (visit 5) from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Network analysis was used to visualize the network structure and to identify key symptoms. Then, a network comparison test was conducted to compare the symptom network properties. Propensity score matching was used to match participants in terms of their covariates.

Results:

In midlife women in perimenopause, frequent mood change was the key symptom with the highest strength (1.59), closeness (1.27), and expected influence (1.62). In midlife women in postmenopause, anxiety was the key symptom with the highest closeness (0.95) and expected influence (1.48). The symptom networks were not significantly different between the 2 groups in terms of global strength (global strength = 0.01, P = .974), network structure (network structure = 0.10, P = .461), and specific centrality measure (centrality = −0.10, P = .083). While the symptom networks were not invariant, the key symptoms were different between the 2 groups.

Conclusion:

Our study findings indicate a potential need for different symptom management approaches for midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause. With this new knowledge, clinicians should offer targeted key symptom assessment and management.

Keywords

menopause midlife symptom women

With aging, midlife women enter into perimenopause and postmenopause.¹ Herein, the female reproductive life course is broadly classified into 3 main stages that include premenopause, perimenopause, and postmenopause.¹ Premenopause refers to a period of regular menstrual cycles with no change in cycle regularity or length.² Perimenopause is a period of time when a woman has irregular menstrual cycles or skips a menstrual cycle.^2,3 Postmenopause is a period of time when a woman has not had a menstrual cycle for more than 12 months in a row.^2,3 When comparing these 3 stages, midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause typically experience more complex symptoms than those in premenopause.⁴ This complex symptomatology is largely attributed to hormonal fluctuations, specifically an increase in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and a decrease in estrogen and progesterone levels which start during premenopause and persist through postmenopause.³ These hormonal changes can lead to a range of physical and psychological symptoms, significantly impacting the quality of life for women in these later stages.³ For example, women may experience a wide spectrum of physical symptoms, including hot flashes, night sweats, and weight gain, in addition to psychological symptoms such as mood swings, anxiety, and depression.^5,6 This combination presents a multifaceted challenge for women in perimenopause and postmenopause, particularly in contrast to those in premenopause, who do not experience the same degree of hormonal fluctuations.^5,6 Despite the prevalence of midlife women experiencing perimenopause and postmenopause, there exists a substantial gap in our understanding of the specific symptomatology linked to these distinct stages. Most existing research tends to focus either exclusively on 1 stage or combines both stages, often overlooking the potential differences in symptoms that may arise during each phase.^6,7 Understanding the differences in symptom profiles could be crucial for clinicians in developing effective management strategies that address the unique challenges faced by women in these distinct menopausal stages.

To date, much of the existing research has primarily focused on comparing the prevalence and intensity of symptoms across various menopausal stages.^8,9 For instance, a recent cross-sectional study indicated that postmenopausal women experience more severe urinary symptoms than their perimenopausal counterparts, while perimenopausal women report a higher frequency of somatic and psychological symptoms.⁹ A longitudinal study has focused on specific symptoms, such as depressive symptoms, and their variations throughout the menopausal transition without taking into account other symptoms.¹⁰ As a result, there has been a notable lack of investigation into the specific differences in symptomatology between perimenopause and postmenopause.¹¹ This gap in the literature regarding the distinct variations in symptom experiences constrains our understanding of the unique challenges that women encounter during each phase. Thus, there is a compelling need for more targeted studies that thoroughly examine these differences, thereby enhancing our knowledge and informing better support and interventions for women navigating these transitional periods.

Traditional statistical methodologies such as regression models have been widely used to examine the relationship between symptoms and menopausal stage in midlife women.^12,13 While they offer important findings, these methodologies may not suitable for examining the complex patterns of symptom interactions and understanding how this interconnected relationship may differ based on the menopausal stage.¹² To fill this gap, network analysis may address the shortcomings of more traditional methods. First, network analysis provides a strong methodological approach to investigate and understand the interconnected relationship among various menopausal symptoms.^14,15 A recent study utilizing network analysis highlighted the interconnectedness of symptoms, revealing significant positive associations among psychological symptoms such as depression, anxiety, forgetfulness, and frequent mood changes, as well as a notable positive relationship between forgetfulness and sexual disturbances.¹⁵ In other words, this approach facilitates the exploration of how different symptoms interact with one another, allowing for a deeper understanding of their collective impact on women’s health during the menopausal transition. By mapping these relationships visually, network analysis makes it possible to identify not only individual symptoms but also how they may influence each other, thereby revealing patterns that traditional statistical methods may overlook.^12,16 Second, it provides an expected influence index that identifies core symptoms within each symptom network, which might be critical for understanding the symptom differences based on menopausal stage.^12,14,17 Third, some properties of network models such as network structure can be further compared through the use of network comparison tests. Currently, there is only 1 study that used network analysis to compare the number and types of core symptoms and symptom clusters experienced by midlife menopausal women with and without metabolic syndrome.¹⁵ However, this study examined midlife women in menopause transition together and assumed their symptom experience to be similar for both groups.¹⁵

The purpose of this current exploratory study was to examine and compare the symptom network structure and core symptoms between midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause through the use of network analysis. Then, a network comparison test was conducted to compare the network properties of perimenopause and postmenopause symptom networks. Previous research has shown that covariates such as age, current perception of health, and body mass index are associated with symptoms among midlife women.^18,19

Methods

Design and Data Collection

This is a secondary data analysis using cross-sectional visit 5 data from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Among all available annual visits from baseline (1996-1997) to visit 10 (2006-2008), visit 5 (2001-2003) was selected to obtain a greater number of midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause.

Description of the Dataset

SWAN is a community-based study that examines the overall health of midlife women in multiple racial and ethnic groups across the United States. The aim of SWAN is to understand how the physical, biological, psychological, and social changes during midlife and menopausal transition affect the overall health in midlife women. At baseline, a total of 3302 participants met the SWAN study eligibility criteria and were enrolled into the study. The eligibility criteria at baseline were (1) women aged between 42 to 52 years, (2) having an intact uterus and at least 1 ovary, (3) have had a menstrual period in the past 3 months, (4) not taking any hormones, and (5) identify as one of each study site’s designated race/ethnic groups. These participants were followed-up annually, with the most recent visit in 2016. More details can be found elsewhere.²⁰

Participants

The inclusion criteria for the perimenopause group were (1) midlife women aged 40 to 65 years and (2) self-report to be in early or late perimenopause. A total of 1719 participants met the inclusion criteria for the perimenopause group. The inclusion criteria for the postmenopause group were (1) midlife women aged 40 to 65 years and (2) self-report to be in postmenopause. A total of 898 participants met the inclusion criteria for the postmenopause group. We excluded data with any missing values within variables of interest (eg, covariates for propensity score matching analysis), which was less than 5% of the total sample. In total, our study had 2617 participants who reported to be in either perimenopause or postmenopause.

Measures

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained mostly from self-report using the SWAN-designed questionnaire. Demographic characteristics included age, race and ethnicity, marital status, level of education, annual household income, employment status, and social support. Herein, social support was measured on a 5-point Likert scale using 4 items from the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Social Support Survey²¹ with Cronbach’s alpha of >0.70, and the total score has been categorized into 0 (no social support) to 2 (frequent social support).²² Clinical characteristics included overall perception of health and body mass index (BMI). Participants’ overall perception of health was measured using a single question from the MOS Short Form-36 that has a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85 as a part of the Medical Outcome Study with 5 response categories.^22,23 BMI was calculated using the height and weight that were measured during each visit using standardized study protocols.²⁴

Menopausal stage

Menopausal stage was collected based on participants’ self-reported menstrual bleeding patterns. Perimenopause was defined as having a menstrual period in the past 3 months with change in menstrual cycle regularity in the past 12 months or no menstrual period in the past 3 months with intermittent menstrual bleeding within the past 12 months. Postmenopause refers to having no menstrual period in the past 12 consecutive months.^2,3

Symptoms

The severity of each symptom was measured as 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe). First, symptoms with a prevalence less than 20%, such as cold sweat and urinary urgency, were excluded to increase the clinical significance of our study findings as recommended by previous researchers.²⁵ As a result, a total of 14 symptoms were selected based on the literature and symptoms studied in the SWAN study. The final set of included symptoms were frequent mood change, anxiety, depression, headache, forgetfulness, trouble sleeping, night sweats, hot flashes, decreased sexual desire, decreased sexual arousal, decreased sexual satisfaction, vaginal dryness, getting up from sleep to urinate, and stiffness.

Depression was measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression (CES-D) scale, which has shown to be a reliable and valid tool among midlife US adults^26,27 with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.90. Anxiety was measured using the menopause symptom questionnaire that asked the frequency of 4 anxiety symptoms experienced in the past 2 weeks (irritability, nervousness, feeling fearful, and heart pounding). Each anxiety symptom was coded from 0 (none) to 4 (daily), and the sum score for all anxiety symptoms was derived. Then the average was used as a composite score as recommended in previous literature, which has shown a good convergent validity with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale.^28,29 Other symptoms were measured from self-report using the SWAN-designed questionnaire that asked about the frequency of each symptom experienced in the past 2 weeks.

Data Analysis

Propensity score matching

Midlife perimenopausal women (n = 1719) were statistically matched with midlife postmenopausal women (n = 898) using propensity score matching in terms of their covariates with ratio of 1:1, which resulted in 898 women in each group. Propensity score matching was used to match participants with menopausal status as a dependent variable and covariates such as age, race/ethnicity, marital status, level of education, annual income, employment status, social support, overall perceived health, and BMI as independent variables. Using the R-package MatchIt, the propensity scores were calculated with logistic regression and matching was performed using the nearest neighbor matching algorithm. Then, the covariate balance was assessed before and after propensity score matching using χ² tests for categorical variables and independent t-tests for continuous variables to ensure that the propensity score matching had worked.

Network analysis

The symptom networks were constructed using the propensity score matched midlife perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. The following steps for network analysis were followed: (1) network assessment, (2) network accuracy and stability, and (3) network comparison. R statistical software version 3.6.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used to conduct the network analysis.

Network assessment

The q-graph in R-package was used to create partial correlations for both groups. To estimate the network, the graphical least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm with extended Bayesian information criteria (EBIC) was used with a recommended gamma (γ) value of 0.25. This method was selected to minimize the number of spurious edges and potential issues of over-fitting and unstable estimates.¹² LASSO has been recommended for its flexibility in terms of noncontinuous data and low likelihood of false positive edges and the selected EBIC helps enhance the accuracy and interpretability of the constructed networks.¹²

Within the constructed network, nodes represent symptoms and edges represent the relationship between the symptoms independent of other nodes.¹⁴ A blue edge represents a positive relationship and a red edge represents a negative relationship between the 2 nodes.¹⁴ In addition, the strength of the relationship is indicated by the width of each edge.¹⁴ A thick edge indicates a strong relationship and a thin edge indicates a weak relationship between the 2 nodes.¹⁴ To estimate the importance of each node within the network, 3 centrality measures of strength, betweenness, and closeness were estimated.¹² Strength measures how strongly a node is connected to other nodes based on the sum of weighted number and strength of all connections of this specific node in relation to other nodes.¹² Betweenness indicates the number of times that a node is in the shortest pathway between other nodes.¹² Closeness measures the average distance of a specific node to other nodes in the network.¹² Typically, nodes with high centrality values are considered to be core symptoms within each network, but only when there are positive relationships among the nodes.¹² When there is a combination of positive and negative relationships, these centrality indices do not adequately assess the nature and strength of a node within the network. In this case, expected influence index is often used to consider the presence of negative relationships among the nodes.¹⁷

Network accuracy and stability

After the network assessment, network accuracy and stability were examined using the R-package bootnet. We calculated a 95% confidence interval to estimate the accuracy of edge weights. As confidence interval requires prior knowledge on the sampling estimation, which is often difficult to have, we conducted the nonparametric bootstrapping method (1500 bootstrap iterations) to repeatedly estimate the model to obtain the required statistics. Then, we conducted a case-drop bootstrapping method to estimate the correlation stability coefficient (Cs-coefficient) to quantify the stability of centrality indices. While there is no specific cut-off value for Cs-coefficient, researchers recommend a minimum value of 0.25 and preferably over 0.50. Finally, we conducted bootstrapped difference test with α = .05 based on 1500 bootstrap iterations to test for statistical significance between 2 node strengths or edge weights.

Network comparison

The R-package NetworkComparisonTest (NCT) was used to compare the symptom network properties between midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause. The NCT is a permutation-based hypothesis test that allows for a direct comparison of 2 symptom networks through testing for differences in their network structure 1000 times repeatedly. It tests on 4 invariance hypotheses that include (1) global strength (S), (2) network structure, (3) one-to-one edge strength, and (4) specific centrality measure. The global strength invariance hypothesis assumes the overall connectivity to be identical across subpopulations. The network structure invariance hypothesis assumes the structure to be completely identical across subpopulations. The one-to-one edge strength invariance hypothesis assumes a specific edge to be identical across subpopulations. Last, the specific centrality measure assumes that the 2 networks are not different in strength centrality measure.³⁰

Results

Sample Characteristics

The mean (±SD) age of midlife women in perimenopause was 51.7 ± 2.1 years, while the mean age of midlife women in postmenopause was 52.7 ± 2.5 years. The difference between the mean age between midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause was still found to be significant (P < .001). However, the differences in other demographic and clinical characteristics were no longer statistically significant after propensity score matching. Refer to Table 1 for further details.

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics Before and After PSM.

Variable	Before PSM		P	After PSM		P
Variable	Perimenopause (n = 1719)	Postmenopause (n = 898)	P	Perimenopause (n = 898)	Postmenopause (n = 898)	P
Age, mean ± SD	50.14 ± 2.35	52.66 ± 2.54	<.001	51.70 ± 2.06	52.66 ± 2.54	<.001
Race/ethnicity, n (%)			.433			.998
African American	511 (29.7)	248 (27.6)		243 (27.1)	248 (27.6)
Chinese	70 (4.1)	42 (4.7)		41 (4.6)	42 (4.7)
Japanese	106 (6.2)	44 (4.9)		44 (4.9)	44 (4.9)
White	846 (49.2)	462 (51.4)		468 (52.1)	462 (51.4)
Hispanic	186 (10.8)	102 (11.4)		102 (11.4)	102 (11.4)
Marital status, n (%)			.032			.889
Single/never married	219 (12.7)	120 (13.4)		126 (14.0)	120 (13.4)
Currently married	1154 (67.1)	560 (62.4)		559 (62.2)	560 (62.4)
Separated	56 (3.3)	37 (4.1)		31 (3.5)	37 (4.1)
Widowed	46 (2.7)	41 (4.6)		36 (4.0)	41 (4.6)
Divorced	244 (14.2)	140 (15.6)		146 (16.3)	140 (15.6)
Education, n (%)			.133			.876
Less than high school	161 (9.4)	90 (10.0)		85 (9.5)	90 (10.0)
High school graduate	469 (27.3)	216 (24.1)		234 (26.1)	216 (24.1)
Some college	564 (32.8)	281 (31.3)		281 (31.3)	281 (31.3)
College graduate	271 (15.8)	150 (16.7)		147 (16.4)	150 (16.7)
Post graduate	254 (14.8)	161 (17.9)		151 (16.8)	161 (17.9)
Annual income, n (%)			<.001			.698
Less than $19 999	145 (8.4)	100 (11.1)		87 (9.7)	100 (11.1)
$20 000 to $49 999	366 (21.3)	248 (27.6)		240 (26.7)	248 (27.6)
$50 000 to $99 999	827 (48.1)	362 (40.3)		375 (41.8)	362 (40.3)
$100 000 or more	381 (22.2)	188 (20.9)		196 (21.8)	188 (20.9)
Currently employed, n (%)	1397 (81.3)	700 (78.0)	.043	711 (79.2)	700 (78.0)	.527
Social support, n (%)			.252			.853
None of the time	10 (0.6)	7 (0.8)		6 (0.7)	7 (0.8)
A little-some of the time	207 (12.0)	127 (14.1)		120 (13.4)	127 (14.1)
Most-all of the time	1502 (87.4)	764 (85.1)		772 (86.0)	764 (85.1)
Overall health, n (%)			.002			.271
Poor-fair	212 (12.3)	155 (17.3)		136 (15.1)	155 (17.3)
Good-very good	530 (30.8)	275 (30.6)		262 (29.2)	275 (30.6)
Excellent	977 (56.8)	468 (52.1)		500 (55.7)	468 (52.1)
Body mass index, mean ± SD, kg/m²	28.63 ± 6.83	28.94 ± 6.88	.27	28.90 ± 6.90	28.94 ± 6.88	.89

Abbreviations: PSM: propensity score matching; SD: standard deviation.

Network Assessment

Figure 1 visualizes the symptom network structure for midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause, respectively. In both networks, a strong relationship was found between anxiety-frequent mood change, night sweat-hot flash, depression-anxiety, decreased sexual satisfaction-decreased sexual arousal, and decreased sexual desire-decreased sexual arousal. In addition, a negative relationship was noted in both groups between vaginal dryness-forgetfulness and stiffness-night sweat. The strength of the relationship was stronger for most of the symptoms for midlife women in perimenopause. In the symptom network for midlife women in perimenopause, a negative relationship was found between stiffness-night sweat, vaginal dryness-forgetfulness, and hot flash-forgetfulness. On the other hand, for midlife women in postmenopause, a negative relationship was found between vaginal dryness-decreased sexual desire, frequent mood change-decreased sexual arousal, and decreased sexual desire-forgetfulness.

Figure 1.

Network visualization for perimenopause (left) and postmenopause (right); desires: decreased sexual desire, satisfy: decreased sexual satisfaction, aroused: decreased sexual arousal, cesds: depression, anxietys: anxiety, stiff: body stiffness, niteswe: night sweat, vagindr: vaginal dryness, forget: forgetfulness, moodchg: frequent mood change, hdache: headache, hotflas: hot flash, trblsle: trouble sleeping, getupur: get up to urinate. Blue line: positive relationship; red line: negative relationship; thick line: strong relationship; thin line: weak relationship.

Table 2 shows the values for 3 centrality indices (strength, betweenness, and closeness) and expected influence index. In midlife women in perimenopause (n = 898), frequent mood change was the core symptom with the highest expected influence (1.62). In midlife women in postmenopause (n = 898), anxiety was the core symptom with the highest expected influence (1.48). Refer to Figure 2 for the plotting of centrality indices.

Table 2.

Symptom Centrality Indices.

Perimenopause					Postmenopause
Symptom	Strength	Betweenness	Closeness	Expected influence	Symptom	Strength	Betweenness	Closeness	Expected influence
Frequent mood change	1.59	1.10	1.27	1.62	Anxiety	1.30	1.54	0.95	1.48
Anxiety	1.30	−0.40	1.11	1.35	Night sweat	1.34	1.82	0.64	1.19
Hot flash	1.02	−0.403	0.62	0.84	Decreased sexual arousal	1.28	0.28	0.38	0.98
Night sweat	1.10	1.51	0.88	0.81	Depression	0.72	0.14	0.85	0.96
Depression	0.51	1.71	0.96	0.60	Frequent mood change	0.92	0.56	0.81	0.84
Decreased sexual arousal	0.44	0.30	−0.83	0.53	Hot flash	0.31	−1.12	0.14	0.40
Trouble sleeping	0.12	0.10	0.94	0.23	Decreased sexual satisfaction	−0.14	−0.56	0.05	0.17
Decreased sexual satisfaction	−0.46	1.00	−0.64	−0.31	Trouble sleeping	−0.22	0.42	0.59	0.10
Headache	−0.44	−1.00	0.31	−0.35	Headache	−1.19	−1.12	−0.65	−0.78
Vaginal dryness	−0.58	−1.00	−0.05	−0.62	Decreased sexual desire	−0.09	−0.84	0.17	−0.79
Get up to urinate	−1.09	−1.00	−0.48	−0.91	Get up to urinate	−1.19	−1.12	−0.80	−0.97
Decreased sexual desire	−1.10	−1.00	−1.17	−0.98	Stiff	−1.22	−0.56	−1.97	−1.14
Stiff	−1.22	0.100	−1.32	−1.39	Vaginal dryness	−0.55	1.12	0.81	−1.14
Forgetfulness	−1.17	−1.00	−1.59	−1.43	Forgetfulness	−1.26	−0.56	−2.00	−1.31

Listed in terms of key symptoms (with the most central key symptom at the top and the least central at the bottom).

Figure 2.

Symptom centrality indices for perimenopause (left) and postmenopause (right).

Network Accuracy and Stability

For both symptom networks for midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause, strength showed a higher stability than betweenness and closeness with a Cs-coefficient of 0.751. For midlife women in perimenopause, the Cs-coefficient for betweenness was 0 and closeness was 0.283. For midlife women in postmenopause, the Cs-coefficient for betweenness was 0.128 and closeness was 0.439. However, given the low Cs-coefficient for betweenness in midlife women in perimenopause, the betweenness may not be a reliable centrality index.

Network Comparison

The 2 networks were similar in terms of the global strength, network structure, one-to-one edge, and specific centrality measure. The global strength (S = 0.01, P = .974) for midlife women in perimenopause was 3.73 and midlife women in postmenopause was 3.75. The difference in the network structure was 0.10 (P = .461) and the specific centrality measure was −0.10 (P = .083) between the 2 groups, both of which were not significant. As the global strength, network structure invariance, and specific centrality measure were similar between midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause, the edge invariance test was not further conducted (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Difference in global strength and maximum difference in edge strength.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the few studies to use network analysis to identify and compare the symptom networks and core symptoms between midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause. Although a recent study employed a similar approach, it focused on examining the differences in the depression network between the 2 stages without comparing overall or core symptoms.³¹ In our study, the symptom networks were similar in terms of the global strength, network structure, one-to-one edge, and specific centrality measure. However, the core symptoms within each symptom network were different between the 2 groups.

Upon examining the symptom network, there was a strong relationship between certain symptoms (eg, depression-anxiety) in both groups, though the strength of these relationships was stronger in midlife women in perimenopause. Depression and anxiety are common mental health symptoms among menopausal women,^15,29,32 which may explain the strong relationship found in both groups. For example, midlife women frequently receive diagnoses of anxiety, which is significantly associated with the onset of major depressive disorder in the subsequent year, thereby potentially contributing to the co-occurrence of depression and anxiety within this population.³³ In consequence, depression is likely to co-occur with anxiety, and research indicates that the diagnosis of depression-combined anxiety has the most significant negative impact on health-related quality of life for midlife women over time.³⁴ Considering the strong relationship between the 2 symptoms and their negative impact on health-related quality of life, it is imperative for clinicians to provide pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to alleviate symptoms of both depression and anxiety. Furthermore, researchers should prioritize the identification of factors that contribute to the co-occurrence of these disorders among midlife women, enabling the implementation of early and targeted interventions.

We found a negative relationship between vaginal dryness-forgetfulness and stiffness-night sweat in both groups. There is a strong evidence in the literature that midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause experience vaginal dryness, forgetfulness, stiffness, and night sweat.^35-38 Few studies have examined the relationships among the 4 symptoms of vaginal dryness, forgetfulness, stiffness, and night sweat.^35-38 For example, a recent study found that women experiencing night sweats are more vulnerable to prefrontal cortex deficits that may lead to poor attention, executive function, and forgetfulness.^35-38 Yet, no studies have examined the relationship between vaginal dryness-forgetfulness and stiffness-night sweat. Our study findings add to the body of evidence about the potential negative relationships among these symptoms, which warrants further research.

With the presence of both positive and negative relationships among the symptoms, we used the expected influence index to identify core symptoms in each network. Frequent mood change was the core symptom in midlife women in perimenopause, and anxiety was the core symptom in midlife women in postmenopause. When midlife women enter into early perimenopause, they often experience conflicting attitudes toward aging accompanied by changes in social roles and responsibilities, career changes, and children leaving home, characterized by both positive and negative feelings, alongside heightened sensitivity to hormonal fluctuations typical of the luteal phase of their menstrual cycles.^39-43 Perimenopause is a period of time of significant hormonal instability.⁴⁴ The first hormone to change during early-perimenopause is decreased anti-Mullerian hormone, followed by increased FSH and decreased inhibin B.^45,46 As these women experience hormonal and biological changes for the first time during the perimenopause, the first symptom experienced tends to evolve around their mood, which may support the finding of frequent mood change as the core symptom among perimenopausal women.^39,40

In contrast, midlife women in postmenopause experience markedly raised FSH and decreased level of estradiol, while inhibin B and anti-Mullerian hormonal levels are undetectable.⁴⁴ These midlife women experience a peak in their anxiety and even panic attacks especially during their postmenopausal period.⁴⁷ The different time and rate of hormonal changes during perimenopause and postmenopause may explain the different core symptoms for both groups. As midlife women experience multiple symptoms concurrently, clinicians are often faced with challenges to assess and manage their symptoms. Core symptoms are critical study findings that may serve as targets for future symptom management interventions.¹⁵ With this new knowledge, clinicians need to prioritize symptom assessment and management for the identified core symptoms in clinical settings.

We further compared the 2 symptom networks between midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause using the network comparison test. While the 2 symptom networks were similar, the global strength was higher in midlife women in postmenopause. The global strength invariance hypothesis assumes the overall connectivity to be identical across subpopulations.³⁰ However, the higher global strength in midlife women in postmenopause may indicate a more strongly connected and dense network of symptoms. This contrasts with previous research indicating that perimenopausal women are more prone to frequent and severe symptoms from hormonal fluctuations compared to postmenopausal women, who have typically adapted to these changes.^7,28,48 However, postmenopausal women face a higher risk of medical comorbidities, such as osteoporosis and metabolic syndrome, compared to perimenopausal women, which can lead to increased level of distress.^49,50 As postmenopausal women navigate this complex landscape of health challenges, they may require more targeted support and interventions to effectively manage their symptoms and improve their quality of life. Recognizing these differences in symptom networks in important for developing targeted interventions that address the specific needs of midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause.

Limitations

Our study has several limitations to consider. First, network comparison testing has been used mainly for Gaussian and binary data. All the ordinal symptom variables used for the current data analysis were treated as Gaussian, which has been used by previous researchers. However, the results should be interpreted with caution as it may include some bias in the estimation of group differences in symptoms during the permutation process. Second, this is an exploratory study that focuses on a network structure based on symptom severity. As symptom is conceptualized as multidimensional, future studies should identify and compare the symptom networks using other symptom dimensions such as occurrence and frequency. Third, all the symptoms were obtained retrospectively via self-report using the SWAN-designed questionnaire, which may be prone to recall bias. Fourth, different symptom measures were used to measure symptoms such as the CES-D, a composite score of 4 anxiety symptoms, and SWAN-designed questionnaires. There may be numerous associated symptoms within their corresponding symptom constructions, which can overlap with other symptoms. Fifth, the sample size for midlife women in perimenopause was reduced during propensity score matching (PSM) from 1719 to 898. While a comparable group was created through the use of PSM, the validity of our study findings may be affected. Sixth, our study did not consider those women with endocrine disorders such as polycystic ovary syndrome which can obscure the signs of perimenopause and thus our findings need to be interpreted with caution. Last, the covariates selected for PSM were based on data availability. As a result, important covariates that can influence menopausal symptoms in midlife women may not have been considered.

Conclusion

The current study used network analysis to find that there were some similar overlapping positive and negative relationships between symptoms in midlife women in perimenopause and postmenopause, with differences in strength. The core symptoms were different for both groups, which indicate a potential need for different symptom management approaches. However, the symptom networks were invariant in terms of global strength, network structure, specific centrality measure, and one-to-one edge invariance. With this new knowledge, clinicians should offer targeted key symptom assessment and management, as well as monitor any changes in symptoms for midlife women undergoing perimenopause and postmenopause.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author Contributions

The named authors confirm contribution to the study as follows: study conceptualization (SHM, QY, SD, CL), data curation (SHM), formal analysis (SHM), methodology (SHM, CL), investigation (SHM, CL), original manuscript development (SHM), and revision and approval of the final manuscript (SHM, QY, SD, CL).

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Data Deposition

Not applicable.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethics Approval

This article was a secondary analysis of a de-identified data set. Primary data collection from human participants was not performed by any of the authors.

ORCID iD

Se Hee Min

References

Taechakraichana

Jaisamrarn

Panyakhamlerd

Chaikittisilpa

Limpaphayom

KK.

Climacteric: concept, consequence and care. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002;85(Suppl 1):S1-S15.

Butler

Santoro

The reproductive endocrinology of the menopausal transition. Steroids. 2011;76(7):627-635. doi:10.1016/j.steroids.2011.02.026

El Khoudary

Greendale

Crawford

, et al The menopause transition and women’s health at midlife: a progress report from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause. 2019;26(10):1213-1227. doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000001424

Berecki-Gisolf

Begum

Dobson

AJ.

Symptoms reported by women in midlife: menopausal transition or aging?

Menopause. 2009;16(5):1021-1029. doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e3181a8c49f

Dalal

Agarwal

Postmenopausal syndrome. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015;57(Suppl 2):S222-S232. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.161483

Santoro

Roeca

Peters

Neal-Perry

The menopause transition: signs, symptoms, and management options. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(1):1-15. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa764

Williams

Kalilani

DiBenedetti

, et al Frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms among peri- and postmenopausal women in the United States. Climacteric. 2008;11(1):32-43. doi:10.1080/13697130701744696

Vanwesenbeeck

Vennix

van de Wiel

“Menopausal symptoms”: associations with menopausal status and psychosocial factors. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;22(3):149-158. doi:10.3109/01674820109049967

Bab Eghbal

Sharami

Kabodmehri

Kazemi Aski

Eslami-Kenarsari

Rafiei Sorouri

. Evaluation of menopausal symptoms of perimenopausal and postmenopausal stages in comparison with the premenopausal group. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. Published online July 2, 2024. Accessed January 8, 2025. https://www.jogcr.com/article_714166.html

10.

Bromberger

Schott

Kravitz

, et al Longitudinal change in reproductive hormones and depressive symptoms across the menopausal transition: results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(6):598-607. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.55

11.

Obermeyer

Reher

Saliba

Symptoms, menopause status, and country differences: a comparative analysis from DAMES. Menopause. 2007;14(4):788-797. doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e318046eb4a

12.

Hevey

Network analysis: a brief overview and tutorial. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018;6(1):301-328. doi:10.1080/21642850.2018.1521283

13.

Mulhall

Andel

Anstey

KJ.

Variation in symptoms of depression and anxiety in midlife women by menopausal status. Maturitas. 2018;108:7-12. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.11.005

14.

Papachristou

Barnaghi

Cooper

, et al Network analysis of the multidimensional symptom experience of oncology. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2258. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36973-1

15.

Min

Yang

Docherty

Symptom clusters and key symptoms among midlife perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with and without metabolic syndrome. Nurs Res. 2022;71(4):E28-E38. doi:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000591

16.

Park

You

, et al Depressive symptom network associated with comorbid anxiety in late-life depression. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:856. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00856

17.

Robinaugh

Millner

McNally

RJ.

Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. J Abnorm Psychol. 2016;125(6):747-757. doi:10.1037/abn0000181

18.

Brown

Gallicchio

Flaws

Tracy

JK.

Relations among menopausal symptoms, sleep disturbance and depressive symptoms in midlife. Maturitas. 2009;62(2):184-189. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.11.019

19.

Cray

Woods

Herting

Mitchell

ES.

Symptom clusters during the late reproductive stage through the early postmenopause: observations from the Seattle Midlife Women’s Health Study. Menopause. 2012;19(8):864-869. doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31824790a6

20.

Torréns

Sutton-Tyrrell

Zhao

, et al Relative androgen excess during the menopausal transition predicts incident metabolic syndrome in mid-life women: Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Menopause. 2009;16(2):257-264. doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e318185e249

21.

Dao-Tran

Lam

Balasooriya

Comans

The Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS): a psychometric systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2023;79(12):4521-4541. doi:10.1111/jan.15786

22.

Bromberger

Matthews

Schott

, et al Depressive symptoms during the menopausal transition: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). J Affect Disord. 2007;103(1-3):267-272. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.01.034

23.

Brazier

Harper

Jones

, et al Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305(6846):160-164. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160

24.

Hall

Okun

Sowers

, et al Sleep is associated with the metabolic syndrome in a multi-ethnic cohort of midlife women: the SWAN sleep study. Sleep. 2012;35(6):783-790. doi:10.5665/sleep.1874

25.

Albusoul

Berger

Gay

Janson

Lee

KA.

Symptom clusters change over time in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(5):880-886. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.332

26.

Cosco

Prina

Stubbs

. Reliability and validity of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale in a population-based cohort of middle-aged U.S. adults. J Nurs Meas. 2017;25(3):476-485. doi:10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.476

27.

Jones

Minarik

Gilliss

Lee

KA.

Depressive symptoms associated with physical health problems in midlife women: a longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. 2020;263:301-309. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.166

28.

Bromberger

Kravitz

Chang

, et al Does risk for anxiety increase during the menopausal transition? Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause. 2013;20(5):488-495. doi:10.1097/GME.0b013e3182730599

29.

Kravitz

Schott

Joffe

Cyranowski

Bromberger

JT.

Do anxiety symptoms predict major depressive disorder in midlife women? The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) Mental Health Study (MHS). Psychol Med. 2014;44(12):2593-2602. doi:10.1017/S0033291714000075

30.

van Borkulo

. A tutorial on R package NetworkComparisonTest (NCT). In: Symptom Network Models in Depression Research: From Methodological Exploration to Clinical Application. 2018: Appendix E. Accessed March 28, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317493228_A_tutorial_on_R_package_NetworkComparisonTest_NCT

31.

Martin-Key

Funnell

Benacek

Spadaro

Bahn

Using network analysis to understand the association between menopause and depressive symptoms. npj Womens Health. 2024;2(1):41. doi:10.1038/s44294-024-00045-9

32.

Alblooshi

Taylor

Gill

Does menopause elevate the risk for developing depression and anxiety? Results from a systematic review. Australas Psychiatry. 2023;31(2):165-173. doi:10.1177/10398562231165439

33.

Kravitz

Schott

Joffe

Cyranowski

Bromberger

JT.

34.

Joffe

Chang

Dhaliwal

, et al Lifetime history of depression and anxiety disorders as a predictor of quality of life in midlife women in the absence of current illness episodes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(5):484-492. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1578

35.

Augoulea

Moros

Lykeridou

Kaparos

Lyberi

Panoulis

Psychosomatic and vasomotor symptom changes during transition to menopause. Prz Menopauzalny. 2019;18(2):110-115. doi:10.5114/pm.2019.86835

36.

Avis

Crawford

Green

Vasomotor symptoms across the menopause transition: differences among women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018;45(4):629-640. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2018.07.005

37.

Kim

Jung

Prevention of cognitive impairment in the midlife women. J Menopausal Med. 2015;21(1):19-23. doi:10.6118/jmm.2015.21.1.19

38.

Ruan

Cui

Jin

Mueck

AO.

Prevalence of climacteric symptoms comparing perimenopausal and postmenopausal Chinese women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2017;38(3):161-169. doi:10.1080/0167482X.2016.1244181

39.

Gava

Orsili

Alvisi

Mancini

Seracchioli

Meriggiola

MC.

Cognition, Mood and sleep in menopausal transition: the role of menopause hormone therapy. Medicina. 2019;55(10):668. doi:10.3390/medicina55100668

40.

Jurgenson

Jones

Haynes

Green

Thompson

SC.

Exploring Australian Aboriginal women’s experiences of menopause: a descriptive study. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14(1):47. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-14-47

41.

Harper

Phillips

Biswakarma

, et al An online survey of perimenopausal women to determine their attitudes and knowledge of the menopause. Womens Health. 2022;18:17455057221106890. doi:10.1177/17455057221106890

42.

Tariq

Phillips

Biswakarma

Talaulikar

Harper

JC.

Women’s knowledge and attitudes to the menopause: a comparison of women over 40 who were in the perimenopause, post menopause and those not in the peri or post menopause. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23:460. doi:10.1186/s12905-023-02424-x

43.

Thomas

Mitchell

Woods

NF.

The challenges of midlife women: themes from the Seattle midlife Women’s health study. Womens Midlife Health. 2018;4(1):8. doi:10.1186/s40695-018-0039-9

44.

Burger

Hale

Robertson

Dennerstein

A review of hormonal changes during the menopausal transition: focus on findings from the Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(6):559-565. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmm020

45.

Burger

Dudley

Robertson

Dennerstein

Hormonal changes in the menopause transition. Recent Prog Horm Res. 2002;57:257-275. doi:10.1210/rp.57.1.257

46.

Freeman

EW.

Hormone changes associated with the menopausal transition. Minerva Ginecol. 2009;61(6):483-489.

47.

Smoller

Pollack

Wassertheil-Smoller

, et al Prevalence and correlates of panic attacks in postmenopausal women: results from an ancillary study to the women’s health initiative. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(17):2041-2050. doi:10.1001/archinte.163.17.2041

48.

Badawy

Spector

Desai

The risk of depression in the menopausal stages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2024;357:126-133. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.041

49.

Jouyandeh

Nayebzadeh

Qorbani

Asadi

Metabolic syndrome and menopause. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2013;12(1):1. doi:10.1186/2251-6581-12-1

50.

Eastell

O’Neill

Hofbauer

, et al Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16069. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.69

Comparison of Symptoms Between Midlife Women in Perimenopause and Postmenopause Using Network Comparison Test

Abstract

Introduction:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Methods

Design and Data Collection

Description of the Dataset

Participants

Measures

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Menopausal stage

Symptoms

Data Analysis

Propensity score matching

Network analysis

Network assessment

Network accuracy and stability

Network comparison

Results

Sample Characteristics

Network Assessment

Network Accuracy and Stability

Network Comparison

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Author Contributions

Data Availability

Data Deposition

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

Ethics Approval

ORCID iD

References