Coping with a loved one’s critical illness as a surrogate decision-maker (SDM) elicits intense psychological distress. Emotion regulation (ER) may mitigate psychological distress. However, ER tendencies and their effects on psychological distress vary by racial and gender identity, which can inform the tailoring of ER-focused interventions. For this study, we examined between-group differences and the moderating effects of race and gender on ER (reappraisal and suppression) and psychological distress. We recruited 274 SDMs from a Midwestern academic medical center. Men reported a greater tendency to use suppression than women, and SDMs identifying as non-White reported a greater tendency to use reappraisal and suppression. Reappraisal resulted in greater psychological distress for non-White men and less psychological distress for White women. Incorporating tailored ER skill building into supportive interventions may improve the short- and long-term psychological well-being of SDMs, which may improve their ability to make value-concordant decisions and fulfill other informal caregiving responsibilities.
Abdul HalainA.TangL. Y.ChongM. C.IbrahimN. A.AbdullahK. L. (2022). Psychological distress among the family members of intensive care unit (ICU) patients: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 31(5–6), 497–507.
2.
Ayuso-MurilloD.Colomer-SánchezA.Santiago-MagdalenaC. R.Lendínez-MesaA.Benítez De GraciaE.López-PeláezA.Herrera-PecoI. (2020). Effect of anxiety on empathy: An observational study among nurses. Healthcare, 8(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fhealthcare8020140
3.
BehrouianM.RamezaniT.DehghanM.SabahiA.Ebrahimnejad ZarandiB. (2021). The effect of the emotion regulation training on the resilience of caregivers of patients with schizophrenia: A parallel randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychology, 9(1), 1–8.
4.
BibasL.Peretz-LarochelleM.AdhikariN. K.GoldfarbM. J.LukA.EnglesakisM.DetskyM. E.LawlerP. R. (2019). Association of surrogate decision-making interventions for critically ill adults with patient, family, and resource use outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open, 2(7), e197229. https://doi.org/10.1001%2Fjamanetworkopen.2019.7229
5.
CaiA.LouY.LongQ.YuanJ. (2016). The sex differences in regulating unpleasant emotion by expressive suppression: Extraversion matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1011. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2016.01011
6.
CheungR. Y.ParkI. J. (2010). Anger suppression, interdependent self-construal, and depression among Asian American and European American college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(4), 517–525.
7.
CutuliD. (2014). Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies role in the emotion regulation: An overview on their modulatory effects and neural correlates. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00175
FordB. Q.TroyA. S. (2019). Reappraisal reconsidered: A closer look at the costs of an acclaimed emotion-regulation strategy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 195–203.
10.
GoubetK. E.ChrysikouE. G. (2019). Emotion regulation flexibility: Gender differences in context sensitivity and repertoire. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00935
11.
GrossJ. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224–237.
12.
GrossJ. J. (2015a). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26.
13.
GrossJ. J. (2015b). The extended process model of emotion regulation: Elaborations, applications, and future directions. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 130–137.
14.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.
15.
GuhnA.MerkelL.HübnerL.DziobekI.SterzerP.KöhlerS. (2020). Understanding versus feeling the emotions of others: How persistent and recurrent depression affect empathy. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 130, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.06.023
16.
HagaS. M.KraftP.CorbyE.-K. (2009). Emotion regulation: Antecedents and well-being outcomes of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression in cross-cultural samples. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(3), 271–291.
17.
HartleyC. A.PhelpsE. A. (2012). Anxiety and decision-making. Biological Psychiatry, 72(2), 113–118.
18.
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
19.
HayesA. F.CaiL. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722.
20.
HickmanR. L.Jr.PignatielloG. A.TahirS. (2018). Evaluation of the Decisional Fatigue Scale Among Surrogate Decision Makers of the Critically Ill. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 40(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945917723828
21.
JiangX.MorenoJ.NgZ. (2022). Examining the interplay of emotion regulation strategies, social stress, and gender in predicting life satisfaction of emerging adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111255
22.
JohnsonS. E.MitchellM. A.BeanM. G.RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2010). Gender moderates the self-regulatory consequences of suppressing emotional reactions to sexism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(2), 215–226.
23.
JohnsonS. K.BautistaC. A.HongS. Y.WeissfeldL.WhiteD. B. (2011). An empirical study of surrogates’ preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 183(7), 915–921.
24.
JuangL. P.MoffittU.KimS. Y.LeeR. M.SotoJ. A.HurleyE.WeisskirchR. S.BlozisS. A.CastilloL. G.HuynhQ.-L. (2016). Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression: Links to racial-ethnic discrimination and adjustment among Latino/a and Asian-heritage college students. Journal of Adolescence, 53(1), 21–33.
25.
KobylińskaD.KusevP. (2019). Flexible emotion regulation: How situational demands and individual differences influence the effectiveness of regulatory strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 72. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2019.00072
26.
KonA. A.DavidsonJ. E.MorrisonW.DanisM.WhiteD. B. (2016). Shared decision-making in intensive care units. Executive summary of the American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 193(12). https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201602-0269ED
27.
KrutsingerD. C.CourtrightK. R.EstabrooksP. A. (2021). Historic abuses, present disparities, and systemic racism: Threats to surrogate decision-making for critical care research enrollment. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 18(7), 1118–1120.
28.
McGowanS. K.SarigiannisK. A.FoxS. C.GottliebM. A.ChenE. (2022). Racial disparities in ICU outcomes: A systematic review. Critical Care Medicine, 50(1), 1–20.
29.
MukherjeeD.LeeS.KazinkaR.SatterthwaiteT. D.KableJ. W. (2020). Multiple facets of value-based decision making in major depressive disorder. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–12.
30.
NetzerG.SullivanD. R. (2014). Recognizing, naming, and measuring a family intensive care unit syndrome. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 11(3), 435–441.
31.
NikolinS.TanY. Y.SchwaabA.MoffaA.LooC. K.MartinD. (2021). An investigation of working memory deficits in depression using the n-back task: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 284, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.084
32.
Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2012). Emotion regulation and psychopathology: The role of gender. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8(1), 161–187.
33.
OhbeH.GotoT.MiyamotoY.YasunagaH. (2020). Risk of cardiovascular events after spouse’s ICU admission. Circulation, 142(17), 1691–1693.
34.
O’TooleM. S.MenninD. S.ApplebaumA.WeberB.RoseH.FrescoD. M.ZachariaeR. (2020). A randomized controlled trial of emotion regulation therapy for psychologically distressed caregivers of cancer patients. JNCI Cancer Spectrum, 4(1), pkz074. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkz074
35.
O’TooleM. S.MenninD. S.ApplebaumA. J.FrescoD. M.ZachariaeR. (2021). Moderators and mediators of emotion regulation therapy for psychologically distressed caregivers of cancer patients: Secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial. Acta Oncologica, 60(8), 992–999.
36.
ParkK. U.EichenhornM.DiGiovineB.RitzJ.JordanJ.RubinfeldI. (2018). Different harm and mortality in critically ill medical vs surgical patients: Retrospective analysis of variation in adverse events in different intensive care units. The Permanente Journal, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/16-189
37.
PerchtoldC. M.PapousekI.FinkA.WeberH.RomingerC.WeissE. M. (2019). Gender differences in generating cognitive reappraisals for threatening situations: Reappraisal capacity shields against depressive symptoms in men, but not women. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 553. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2019.00553
38.
PerezC. R.SotoJ. A. (2011). Cognitive reappraisal in the context of oppression: Implications for psychological functioning. Emotion, 11(3), 675–680.
39.
PignatielloG.HickmanR. L.Jr.HetlandB. (2018). End-of-life decision support in the ICU: Where are we now?Western Journal of Nursing Research, 40(1), 84–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945916676542
40.
PignatielloG. A.TownsendA. L.HickmanR. L.Jr. (2021). Structural validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale among family members of critically ill patients. American Journal of Critical Care, 30(3), 212–220.
41.
PreeceD. A.BecerraR.RobinsonK.GrossJ. J. (2019). The emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric properties in general community samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(3), 348–356.
42.
RawalG.YadavS.KumarR. (2017). Post-intensive care syndrome: An overview. Journal of Translational Internal Medicine, 5(2), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtim-2016-0016
43.
RobertsN. A.LevensonR. W.GrossJ. J. (2008). Cardiovascular costs of emotion suppression cross ethnic lines. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 70(1), 82–87.
44.
RottweilerA.-L.TaxerJ. L.NettU. E. (2018). Context matters in the effectiveness of emotion regulation strategies. AERA Open, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2332858418778849
45.
SaeidY.SalareeM. M.EbadiA.MoradianS. T. (2020). Family intensive care unit syndrome: An integrative review. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 25(5), 361–368.
46.
ShalowitzD. I.Garrett-MayerE.WendlerD. (2006). The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: A systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(5), 493–497. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.5.493
47.
SillarsA. A.NicolaidesC.KaranA.WrightR.RobbinsM. L.DavisE. L. (2020). Gender differences in the associations of reappraisal and humor styles. Humor, 33(2), 317–340.
48.
SörmanK.GarkeM. Å.IsacssonN. H.JangardS.BjurebergJ.HellnerC.SinhaR.Jayaram-LindströmN. (2022). Measures of emotion regulation: Convergence and psychometric properties of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale and emotion regulation questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 201–217.
49.
SotoJ. A.ArmentaB. E.PerezC. R.ZamboangaB. L.Umaña-TaylorA. J.LeeR. M.SchwartzS. J.ParkI. J.HuynhQ.-L.WhitbourneS. K. (2012). Strength in numbers? Cognitive reappraisal tendencies and psychological functioning among Latinos in the context of oppression. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18(4), 384–394.
50.
SotoJ. A.PerezC. R.KimY.-H.LeeE. A.MinnickM. R. (2011). Is expressive suppression always associated with poorer psychological functioning? A cross-cultural comparison between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion, 11(6), 1450–1455.
51.
SouthwardM. W.HeiyJ. E.CheavensJ. S. (2019). Emotions as context: Do the naturalistic effects of emotion regulation strategies depend on the regulated emotion?Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 38(6), 451–474.
52.
SpillerS. A.FitzsimonsG. J.LynchJ. G.Jr.McClellandG. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 277–288.
53.
TooheyM. J.MuralidharanA.MedoffD.LuckstedA.DixonL. (2016). Caregiver positive and negative appraisals: Effects of the national alliance on mental illness family-to-family intervention. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 204(2), 156–159.
54.
TroyA. S.FordB. Q.McRaeK.ZaroliaP.MaussI. B. (2017). Change the things you can: Emotion regulation is more beneficial for people from lower than from higher socioeconomic status. Emotion, 17(1), 141–154.
55.
UusbergA.TaxerJ. L.YihJ.UusbergH.GrossJ. J. (2019). Reappraising reappraisal. Emotion Review, 11(4), 267–282.
56.
VytalK. E.CornwellB. R.LetkiewiczA. M.ArkinN. E.GrillonC. (2013). The complex interaction between anxiety and cognition: Insight from spatial and verbal working memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 93. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00093
57.
WebbT. L.MilesE.SheeranP. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 775–808.
58.
WeissN. H.ThomasE. D.SchickM. R.ReyesM. E.ContractorA. A. (2022). Racial and ethnic differences in emotion regulation: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 78(5), 785–808.
WhiteD. B. (2011). Rethinking interventions to improve surrogate decision making in intensive care units. American Journal of Critical Care, 20(3), 252–257.
61.
WhiteD. B.AngusD. C.ShieldsA.-M.BuddadhumarukP.PidroC.PanerC.ChaitinE.ChangC.-C. H.PikeF.WeissfeldL. (2018). A randomized trial of a family-support intervention in intensive care units. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(25), 2365–2375.
62.
WilsonT. K.GentzlerA. L. (2021). Emotion regulation and coping with racial stressors among African Americans across the lifespan. Developmental Review, 61, 100967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100967
63.
ZigmondA. S.SnaithR. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
