Comprehensive participatory planning and evaluation (CPPE), a model used in community engagement research, has not been applied to patient engagement in research. We describe our methodology and interim results using CPPE in a project focused on improving research engagement of rural and distant patients and stakeholders. Specifically, we describe our development of a causal map and the subsequent use of the map to guide patient and stakeholder-driven evaluation.
AverillJ. B. (2016). An ethnographic meta-synthesis of three Southwestern Rural Studies. Public Health Nursing, 33(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12229
3.
BagleyH. J.ShortH.HarmanN. L.HickeyH. R.GambleC. L.WoolfallK.YoungB.WilliamsonP. R. (2016). A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials—A work in progress. Research Involvement and Engagement, 2(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0029-8
4.
BolinJ. N.BellamyG. R.FerdinandA. O.VuongA. M.KashB. A.SchulzeA.HelduserJ. W. (2015). Rural Healthy People 2020: New decade, same challenges. The Journal of Rural Health, 31(3), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12116
CrockerJ. C.BostockJ.LocockL. (2017). Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: A UK-based qualitative interview study. Health Expectations, 20(3), 519–528.
7.
De VosP. G.MaydoG.SosaI.del R. FerrerL.RodriguezA.BonetM.LefevreP.Van der StuyftP. (2011). Comprehensive participatory planning and evaluation (CPPE). Social Medicine in Practice, 6(2), 106–117.
8.
DouthitN.KivS.DwolatzkyT.BiswasS. (2015). Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health,129(6), 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.001
9.
EderM. M.Carter-EdwardsL.HurdT. C.RumalaB. B.WallersteinN. (2013). A logic model for community engagement within the Clinical and Translational Science Awards consortium: Can we measure what we model?Academic Medicine, 88(10), 1430–1436. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829b54ae
10.
FaulknerM.AlikhaaniJ.BrownL.CruzH.DavidsonD.GregoireK.BerdanL.RorickT.JonesW. S.PletcherM. J. (2018). Exploring meaningful patient engagement in ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A patient-centric trial assessing benefits and long-term effectiveness). Medical Care, 56(10Suppl 1), S11–S15. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000949
11.
ForsytheL.HeckertA.MargolisM. K.SchrandtS.FrankL. (2018). Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: Early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Quality of Life Research, 27(1), 17–31.
12.
GagliotiA. H.WalstonD.GuzmanC. E. V.DeraN. T.OrtizC.WrightL. C.RobertsT.ParkerS.YoungV. (2019). A practical approach to establishing a practice-based research network stakeholder engagement infrastructure. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 32(5), 695–704.
13.
GessertC.WaringS.Bailey-DavisL.ConwayP.RobertsM.VanWormerJ. (2015). Rural definition of health: A systematic literature review. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 378. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1658-9
14.
HillJ. L.OliveN. C.WatersC. N.EstabrooksP. A.YouW.ZoellnerJ. M. (2015). Lack of healthy food options on children’s menus of restaurants in the health-disparate Dan River Region of Virginia and North Carolina, 2013. Preventing Chronic Disease, 12, 140400.
15.
IsraelB. A.SchulzA. J.ParkerE. A.BeckerA. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1), 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
16.
KimminauK. S.JerniganC.LeMasterJ.AaronsonL. S.ChristopherM.AhmedS.BoivinA.DeFinoM.GreenleeR.SalvalaggioG.HendricksD.HerbertC.MabachiN. M.MacaulayA.WestfallJ. M.WaitmanL. R. (2018). Patient vs. community engagement: Emerging issues. Medical Care, 56(Suppl. 10), S53–S57. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000772
MarlettN.ShklarovS.MarshallD.SantanaM. J.WasylakT. (2015). Building new roles and relationships in research: A model of patient engagement research. Quality of Life Research, 24(5), 1057–1067.
21.
MattessichP.JohnsonK. M. (2018). Collaboration: What makes it work. Fieldstone Alliance.
MinklerM.WallersteinN. (Eds.). (2011). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. John Wiley & Sons.
24.
MyersC. R. (2019) Using telehealth to remediate rural mental health and healthcare disparities. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 40(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2018.1499157
NdiranguM.PerkinsH.YadrickK.WestJ. R.BogleM. L.Avis-WilliamsA.SantellR.ConnellC. L. (2007). Conducting needs assessment using the comprehensive participatory planning and evaluation model to develop nutrition and physical activity interventions in a rural community in the Mississippi Delta. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 1(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.0.0005
27.
NormanN.CowartS.FelzienM.HaynesC.HernandezM.RodriquezM. P.SanchezN.SanchezS.WinkelmanK.WinkelmanS.Van VorstR.ZittlemanL.WestfallJ. M. (2013). Testing to prevent colon cancer: How rural community members took on a community-based intervention. The Annals of Family Medicine, 11(6), 568–570. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1586
28.
OenG.StormarkK. M. (2013). Participatory action research in the implementing process of evidence-based intervention to prevent childhood obesity: Project design of the “Healthy Future” study. Journal of Obesity, 2013, 437206–437206. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/437206
29.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). (n.d.) Patient-centered outcomes research institute glossary. https://www.pcori.org/glossary
PengW.YuanS.HoltzB. E. (2016). Exploring the challenges and opportunities of health mobile apps for individuals with type 2 diabetes living in rural communities. Telemedicine and e-Health, 22(9), 733–738. http://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0180
32.
SheridanS.ShrandtS.ForsytheL.HilliardT. S.PaezK. A., & Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement (2013 inaugural panel). (2013). The PCORI engagement rubric: Promising practices for partnering in research. Annals of Family Medicine, 15(2), 165–170.
33.
ShippeeN. D.Domecq GarcesJ. P.Prutsky LopezG. J.WangZ.ElraiyahT. A.NabhanM.BritoJ. P.BoehmerK.HasanR.FirwanaB.ErwinP. J.MontoriV. M.MuradM. H. (2015). Patient and service user engagement in research: A systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expectations, 18(5), 1151–1166. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12090
34.
SieckC. J.HefnerJ. L.McAlerneyA. S. (2017). Finding the patient voice in research activities: Perspectives of patient advisors and researchers. Society for Participatory Medicine, 9, e6.
35.
SinghG. K.DausG. P.AllenderM.RameyC. T.MartinE. K.PerryC.De Los ReyesA. A.VedamuthuI. P. (2017). Social determinants of health in the United States: Addressing major health inequality trends for the nation, 1935-2016. International Journal of MCH and AIDS, 6(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.21106/ijma.236
36.
ThomsonJ. L.McCabe-SellersB. J.StricklandE.LoveraD.NussH. J.YadrickK.DukeS.BogleM. L. (2010). Development and evaluation of WillTry. An instrucment for measuring children’s willingness to try fruits and vegetables. Appetite, 54, 465–472.
37.
WilkinsC. H. (2018). Effective engagement requires trust and being trustworthy. Medical Care, 56(10Suppl. 1), S6.
38.
ZankoA.HillJ. L.EstabrooksP. A.NiewolnyK. L.ZoellnerJ. (2014) Evaluating community gardens in a health disparate region: A qualitative case study approach. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 9(2), 137–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/19320248.2014.898171
39.
ZoellnerJ.ConnellC.SantellR.FungweT.StricklandE.Avis-WilliamsA.YadrickK.LoftonK.RowserM.PowersA.LucasG.BogleM. (2007). Fit for life steps: Results of a community walking intervention in the Rural Mississippi Delta. Progress in Community Health Partnerships:Research, Education, and Action, 1(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.0.0009
40.
ZoellnerJ.MotleyM.WilkinsonM. E.JackmanB.BarlowM. L.HillJ. L. (2012a). Engaging the Dan River region to reduce obesity: Application of the Comprehensive Participatory Planning and Evaluation process. Family & Community Health, 35(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e3182385cd9
41.
ZoellnerJ.ZankoA.PriceB.BonnerJ.HillJ. L. (2012b). Exploring community gardens in a health disparate population: Findings from a mixed methods pilot study. Progress in community health partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 6(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2012.0014