This study reports the development and psychometric testing of the Kidney Transplant Self-Management Scale (KT-SMS). The instrument development phase included the following: (a) conceptual definition, item generation, and framework; (b) face validity assessment; and (c) content validity assessment. The psychometric testing phase included the following: (a) construct validity testing; (b) internal consistency reliability testing; (c) convergent validity testing; and (d) predictive power of the KT-SMS using a cross-sectional sample of kidney transplant recipients (N = 153). Factor analysis results supported the 16-item KT-SMS as multidimensional with five domains (medication adherence, cardiovascular risk reduction, protecting kidney, ownership, and skin cancer prevention). Internal consistency reliability for the total scale and five subscales was adequate. Convergent validity was supported as the intercorrelations of the KT-SMS total score with the five subscales were significant. The KT-SMS total score and five subscales were significantly correlated with self-efficacy for managing chronic disease, patient activation, and health-related quality of life.
BanduraA. (2010). Self-efficacy. In The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2.
Been-DahmenJ. M. J.GrijpmaJ. W.IstaE.DwarswaardJ.MaasdamL.WeimarW.StaaA. V.MasseyE. K. (2018). Self-management challenges and support needs among kidney transplant recipients: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(10), 2393–2405. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13730
3.
Chisholm-BurnsM. A.EricksonS. R.SpiveyC. A.GruessnerR. W.KaplanB. (2011). Concurrent validity of kidney transplant questionnaire in US renal transplant recipients. Patient Preference and Adherence, 5, 517–522. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S24261
4.
ChungS. Y.HackerE. D.RawlS.EllisR.BakasT.JonesJ.WelchJ. (2019). Using Facebook in recruiting kidney transplant recipients for a REDCap study. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(12), 1790–1812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919832600
5.
CoemansM.SusalC.DohlerB.AnglicheauD.GiralM.BestardO.LegendreC.EmondsM.-P.KuypersD.MolenberghsG.VerbekeG.NaesensM. (2018). Analyses of the short- and long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation in Europe between 1986 and 2015. Kidney International, 94(5), 964–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.05.018
6.
DeVellisR. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). SAGE Publications.
7.
EvangelistaL. S.LeeJ. A.MooreA. A.MotieM.GhasemzadehH.SarrafzadehM.MangioneC. M. (2015). Examining the effects of remote monitoring systems on activation, self-care, and quality of life in older patients with chronic heart failure. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 30(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000110
8.
FowlesJ. B.TerryP.XiM.HibbardJ.BloomC. T.HarveyL. (2009). Measuring self-management of patients’ and employees’ health: Further validation of the patient activation measure (PAM) based on its relation to employee characteristics. Patient Education and Counseling, 77(1), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.018
9.
GoodworthM. C.SteplemanL.HibbardJ.JohnsL.WrightD.HughesM. D.WilliamsM. J. (2016). Variables associated with patient activation in persons with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314522085
10.
HelanteraI.RaihaJ.FinneP.LempinenM. (2018). Early failure of kidney transplants in the current era—A national cohort study. Transplant International, 31(8), 880–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13115
11.
HibbardJ. H.MahoneyE. R.StockardJ.TuslerM. (2005). Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Services Research, 40(6 Pt. 1), 1918–1930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x
12.
HibbardJ. H.StockardJ.MahoneyE. R.TuslerM. (2004). Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research, 39(4 Pt. 1), 1005–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x
13.
JacobsonA. F.SumodiV.AlbertN. M.ButlerR. S.DeJohnL.WalkerD.DionK.TaiH. L.RossD. M. (2018). Patient activation, knowledge, and health literacy association with self-management behaviors in persons with heart failure. Heart and Lung, 47(5), 447–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.05.021
14.
JohnsonM. L.ZimmermanL.WelchJ. L.HertzogM.PozehlB.PlumbT. (2016). Patient activation with knowledge, self-management and confidence in chronic kidney disease. Journal of Renal Care, 42(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12142
15.
KasiskeB. L.ZeierM. G.ChapmanJ. R.CraigJ. C.EkbergH.GarveyC. A.GreenM. D.JhaV.JosephsonM. A.KiberdB. A.KriesH. A.McDonaldR. A.NewmannJ. M.ObradorG. T.VincentiF. G.CheungM.EarleyA.RamanG.AbarigaS.. . . BalkE. M. (2010). KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients: A summary. Kidney International, 77(4), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2009.377
16.
LaupacisA.PusN.MuirheadN.WongC.FergusonB.KeownP. (1993). Disease-specific questionnaire for patients with a renal transplant. Nephron, 64(2), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1159/000187318
McGillicuddyJ.ChandlerJ.SoxL.MuellerM.NemethL.BaligaP.TreiberF. (2019). “Smartphone medication adherence saves kidneys” for kidney transplantation recipients: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 8(6), e13351. https://doi.org/10.2196/13351
19.
PatrickD. L.BurkeL. B.GwaltneyC. J.LeidyN. K.MartinM. L.MolsenE.RingL. (2011). Content validity—Establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2—Assessing respondent understanding. Value in Health, 14(8), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013
20.
PettM. A.LackeyN. R.SullivanJ. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. SAGE.
21.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
22.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T.OwenS. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
23.
RanahanM.Von VisgerJ.KaylerL. K. (2020). Describing barriers and facilitators for medication adherence and self-management among kidney transplant recipients using the information-motivation-behavioral skills model. Clinical Transplantation, 34(6), e13862. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13862
RitterP. L.LorigK. (2014). The English and Spanish self-efficacy to manage chronic disease scale measures were validated using multiple studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(11), 1265–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.009
26.
SanghaO.StuckiG.LiangM. H.FosselA. H.KatzJ. N. (2003). The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 49(2), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10993
27.
Schmid-MohlerG.Schafer-KellerP.FreiA.FehrT.SpirigR. (2014). A mixed-method study to explore patients’ perspective of self-management tasks in the early phase after kidney transplant. Progress in Transplantation, 24(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.7182/pit2014728
28.
TabachnickB.FidellL. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
29.
TayyebiA.RaiesifarA.Najafi MehriS.EbadiA.EinolahiB.PashandiS. (2012). Measuring health related quality of life (HRQoL) in renal transplant patients: Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of kidney transplant questionnaire (KTQ-25) in Persian. Nephro-Urology Monthly, 4(4), 617–621. https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.1382
30.
ThongprayoonC.HansrivijitP.LeeaphornN.AcharyaP.Torres-OrtizA.KaewputW.KovvuruK.KanduriS. R.BathiniT.CheungpasitpornW. (2020). Recent advances and clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(4), 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041193
31.
UrstadK. H.WahlA. K.AndersenM. H.OyenO.FagermoenM. S. (2012). Renal recipients’ educational experiences in the early post-operative phase—A qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 26(4), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00972.x
32.
WengL. C.DaiY. T.HuangH. L.ChiangY. J. (2010). Self-efficacy, self-care behaviours and quality of life of kidney transplant recipients. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(4), 828–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05243.x
33.
WillisG. B. (2004). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. SAGE Publications.
34.
YoungL.KupzykK.BarnasonS. (2017). The impact of self-management knowledge and support on the relationships among self-efficacy, patient activation, and self-management in rural patients with heart failure. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 32(4), E1–E8. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000390
