Be an NIH Reviewer: Contribute to Multidisciplinary Research

Abstract

One of the best ways to contribute to multidisciplinary research and to improve your own knowledge of the review process at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is to serve as a peer reviewer for research, traineeship, and small business innovation research proposals. Proactive targeted outreach to Scientific Review Officers (SROs) at NIH will increase your chances to become a reviewer. Reviewers with nursing expertise are especially welcome as multidisciplinary research is becoming more prevalent. Steps to identify a likely study section, contact the correct SRO, and review responsibly are described in this article, written by an experienced NIH review officer.

Keywords

peer review NIH multidisciplinary research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hoffmann

T. C.

Glasziou

P. P.

Boutron

Milne

Perera

Moher

. . . Michie

(2014). Better reporting of interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. British Medical Journal, 348, Article g1687. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687

National Institutes of Health. (2012). Budget and period of support information: Reviewer guidance. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/guidelines_general/budget_information.pdf

National Institutes of Health. (2015a). Electronic Research Administration (eRA). Retrieved from https://era.nih.gov/services_for_applicants/apply/personal_profile.cfm

National Institutes of Health. (2015b). Funding: Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT). Retrieved from https://report.nih.gov/budget_and_spending/index.aspx

National Institutes of Health. (2015c). Integrity and confidentiality in NIH peer review. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/confidentiality_peer_review.htm

National Institutes of Health. (2015d). Managing conflict of interest in NIH peer review of grants and contracts. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/peer_coi.htm

National Institutes of Health. (2016a). Extramural Nexus: Grant renewal success rates: Then and now. Retrieved from https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2016/05/26/grant-renewal-success-rates-then-and-now/

National Institutes of Health. (2016b). Grants & funding. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/review_templates.htm

National Institutes of Health. (2016c). Guidelines for the review of the human subjects section. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/guidelines_general/Guidelines_for_the_Review_of_the_Human_Subjects.pdf

10.

National Institutes of Health. (2016d). NIH reviewer orientation. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/guidelines_general/reviewer_orientation.pdf

11.

National Institutes of Health. (2016e). Rigor and reproducibility. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/reproducibility/index.htm

12.

National Institutes of Health. (n.d.-a). Biosketch format pages, instructions and samples. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/forms/biosketch.htm

13.

National Institutes of Health. (n.d.-b). Early Career Reviewer (ECR) program. Retrieved from http://public.csr.nih.gov/ReviewerResources/BecomeAReviewer/ECR/Pages/default.aspx

14.

National Institutes of Health. (n.d.-c). Find a study section. Retrieved from http://public.csr.nih.gov/StudySections/Pages/default.aspx

15.

National Institutes of Health. (n.d.-d). How scientists are selected to be chartered reviewers. Retrieved from https://public.csr.nih.gov/ReviewerResources/BecomeAReviewer/Pages/How-Scientists-Are-Selected.aspx

16.

National Institutes of Health. (n.d.-e). Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT). Retrieved from https://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm

17.

Peer review. (2017). In Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/peer_review

18.

Von Elm

Altman

D. G.

Egger

Pocock

S. J.

Gotzsche

P. C.

Vandenbroucke

J. P.

& The STROBE Initiative. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. British Medical Journal, 335, 806-808.