Ethical Case Study of the Researcher–Participant Relationship in End-of-Life Research

Abstract

Nurse-researchers studying interventions for patients at the end-of-life may become close with participants due to the nature of interactions within the research protocol. In such studies, participants may request further interactions that would constitute clinical care beyond the scope of the protocol. Nurse-researchers may feel a conflict of values between their obligation to the research goals and their inclinations and obligations as nurses to care for their patients. Nurse-researchers in this situation aspire to honor the bonds developed through close contact and ensure participants receive standard of care while maintaining standards of research ethics. Analysis of a case and review of applicable concepts in research ethics, including ethical relationships, therapeutic misconception, equipoise, and population vulnerability, are used to develop recommendations regarding the decision parameters for similar cases.

Keywords

oncology end-of-life intervention research research ethics equipoise therapeutic misconception population vulnerability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

S. J.

(2010). “As long as it helps somebody”: Why vulnerable people participate in research. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 16, 173-178. doi:10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.4.47783

Appelbaum

Anatchkova

Albert

Dunn

L. B.

Lidz

(2012). Therapeutic misconception in research subjects: Development and validation of a measure. Clinical Trials, 9, 748-761.

Appelbaum

Lidz

Grisso

(2004). Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: Frequency and risk factors. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 26(2), 1-8. doi:10.2307/3564231

Appelbaum

Roth

Lidz

Benson

Winslade

(1987). False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Center Report, 17(2), 20-24.

Ashton

(2014). Researcher or nurse? Difficulties of undertaking semi-structured interviews on sensitive topics. Nurse Researcher, 22(1), 27-31.

Baer

R. A.

Huss

D. B.

(2008). Mindfulness-and acceptance-based therapy. In Lebow

J. L.

(Ed.), Twenty-first century psychotherapies: Contemporary approaches to theory and practice (pp. 123-166). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Beale

Wilkes

(2001). Nurse researcher: Always a researcher, sometimes a nurse. Collegian, 8(4), 33-39. doi:10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60032-3

Beauchamp

T. L.

Childress

J. F.

(2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bornemann

Herbert

B. M.

Mehling

W. E.

Singer

(2014). Differential changes in self-reported aspects of interoceptive awareness through 3 months of contemplative training. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1504. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01504

10.

Brody

Miller

F. G.

(2003). The clinician-investigator: Unavoidable but manageable tension. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 13, 329-346. doi:10.1353/ken.2004.0003

11.

Connors

A. F.

(1995). A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 1591-1598. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530200027032

12.

Daubenmier

Sze

Kerr

C. E.

Kemeny

M. E.

Mehling

(2013). Follow your breath: Respiratory interoceptive accuracy in experienced meditators. Psychophysiology, 50, 777-789. doi:10.1111/psyp.12057

13.

Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human participants of research. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html

14.

Department of Veterans Affairs. (2008). Should veterans with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder be considered a vulnerable population for the purpose of applying guidelines for the protection of human subjects in research? Retrieved from http://www.research.va.gov/resources/policies/guidance/ptsd.pdf

15.

Dickson-Swift

(2006). Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 853-871. doi:10.1177/1049732306287526

16.

Eide

Kahn

(2008). Ethical issues in the qualitative researcher–participant relationship. Nursing Ethics, 15, 199-207. doi:10.1177/0969733007086018

17.

Emanuel

E. J.

Wendler

Grady

(2000). What makes clinical research ethical? The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 2701-2711. doi:10.1001/jama.283.20.2701

18.

Frank

A. W.

(2005). What is dialogical research, and why should we do it? Qualitative Health Research, 15, 964-974. doi:10.1177/1049732305279078

19.

Frankena

(1973). Ethics (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

20.

Freedman

(1987). Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 317, 141-145.

21.

Garland

E. L.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2013). Mindfulness broadens awareness and builds meaning at the attention-emotion interface. In Ciarrochi

Kashdan

T. B.

(Eds.), Mindfulness, acceptance, and positive psychology: The seven foundations of well-being (pp. 30-67). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.

22.

Goldberg

D. S.

(2011). Eschewing definitions of the therapeutic misconception: A family resemblance analysis. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 36, 296-320. doi:10.1093/jmp/jhr014

23.

Grady

Edgerly

(2009). Science, technology, and innovation: Nursing responsibilities in clinical research. Nursing Clinics of North America, 44, 471-481. doi:10.1016/j.cnur.2009.07.011

24.

Henderson

Davis

King

Easter

Zimmer

Rothschild

. . . Churchill

(2004). Uncertain benefit: Investigators’ views and communications in early phase gene transfer trials. Molecular Therapy, 10, 225-231.

25.

Hewitt

(2007). Ethical components of researcher researched relationships in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1149-1159. doi:10.1177/1049732307308305

26.

Hickman

S. E.

Cartwright

J. C.

Nelson

C. A.

Knafl

(2012). Compassion and vigilance: Investigators’ strategies to manage ethical concerns in palliative and end-of-life research. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 15, 880-889. doi:10.1089/jpm.2011.0515

27.

Holder

A. R.

(1982). Do researchers and subjects have a fiduciary relationship? IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 4(1), 6. doi:10.2307/3563844

28.

Horng

Emanuel

E. J.

Wilfond

Rackoff

Martz

Grady

(2002). Description of benefits and risks in consent forms for phase I clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 347, 2134-2140.

29.

Joffe

Weeks

(2002). Views of American oncologists about the purposes of clinical trials. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94, 1847-1853.

30.

Josselson

(2007). The ethical attitude in narrative research: Principles and practicalities. In Jean Clandinin

(Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 537-566). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

31.

Kabat-Zinn

Hanh

T. N.

(1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York, NY: Bantam Dell.

32.

Katz

(1972). Experimentation with human beings. New York, NY: Russell Sage.

33.

Katz

(1973). The regulation of human research: Reflections and proposals. Clinical Research, 21, 785-791.

34.

Keng

S.-L.

(2014). Laboratory investigation of mindfulness and reappraisal as emotion regulation strategies (Doctoral thesis). Available from ProQuest database. (AAI3588238)

35.

Kim

S. Y.

Schrock

Wilson

R. M.

Frank

S. A.

Holloway

R. G.

Kieburtz

De Vries

R. G.

(2009). An approach to evaluating therapeutic misconception. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 31(5), 7-14.

36.

Kipnis

(2001). Vulnerability in research subjects: A bioethical taxonomy. In Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants (Vol. II, pp. G-1-G-13). Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Retrieved from https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/559361/nbac_human_part_vol2.pdf

37.

Levine

(1978). The nature and definition of informed consent in various research settings. In Appendix, Vol. I, The Belmont Report (DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78-0013, pp. 3-7-3-82). Retrieved from http://videocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_appendix_belmont_report_vol_1.pdf

38.

Levine

(1993). Ethics of clinical trials. Do they help the patient? Cancer, 72, (9 Suppl.), 2805-2810.

39.

Lomas

Cartwright

Edginton

Ridge

(2014). A qualitative analysis of experiential challenges associated with meditation practice. Mindfulness, 6, 848-860. doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0329-8

40.

Marshall

P. A.

(1995). The SUPPORT study: Who’s talking? Hastings Center Report, 25(6), S9-S11. doi:10.2307/3527849

41.

Matutina

R. E.

(2010). The concept analysis of therapeutic misconception. Nurse Researcher, 17(4), 83-90.

42.

Miller

F. G.

Brody

(2003). A critique of clinical equipoise: Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Hastings Center Report, 33(3), 19-28.

43.

Miller

F. G.

Brody

(2007). Clinical equipoise and the incoherence of research ethics. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 32, 151-165. doi:10.1080/03605310701255750

44.

Miller

F. G.

Joffe

(2011). Equipoise and the dilemma of randomized clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 364, 476-480. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb1011301

45.

Morreim

E. H.

(2005). The clinical investigator as fiduciary: Discarding a misguided idea. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 33, 586-598.

46.

Olsen

(2000). Equipoise: An appropriate standard for ethical review of nursing research? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 267-273.

47.

Shapiro

S. L.

Carlson

L. E.

(2009). Mindfulness-based psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

48.

Tee

S. R.

Lathlean

J. A.

(2004). The ethics of conducting a co-operative inquiry with vulnerable people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47, 536-543.

49.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1991), §46 CFR 46. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html

50.

Yassour-Borochowitz

(2004). Reflections on the researcher–participant relationship and the ethics of dialogue. Ethics & Behavior, 14, 175-186. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1402_5