A better understanding of the relationships between symptom recognition, nursing response, and preferred thinking style is needed to improve nursing education practices. Final semester nursing students (N = 29) completed a high fidelity patient simulation (HFPS) scenario; recognized symptoms (i.e., dyspnea) and responses (i.e., apply oxygen) were recorded, and compared with students’ preferred thinking style using the Rational-Experiential Inventory–40. Relationships between concepts were explored. Significant relationships were noted between preference for Rational thinking styles and symptom recognition (p < .05). Preferred thinking style was not related to numbers of therapeutic responses. Thirty percent of students delayed application of oxygen until directed to do so by members of the health care team. Students having a stronger preference for rational thinking demonstrate greater accuracy in cue recognition. More nursing research is needed to explore the cognitive processing during simulation .
AitkenL. M.MarshallA.ElliottR.McKinleyS. (2011). Comparison of “think aloud” and observation as data collection methods in the study of decision making regarding sedation in intensive care patients. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48, 318-325.
2.
BaileyP. H.ColellaT.MosseyS. (2004). COPD-intuition or template: Nurses’ stories of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13, 756-764.
3.
BalslevT.JarodzkaK. H.HolmqvistW.MuijtjensA. M. M.EikaB.van MerrienboerJ.ScherpbierA. (2012). Visual expertise in paediatric neurology. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 16, 161-166.
4.
BeischelK. P. (2013). Variables affecting learning in a simulation experience: A mixed methods study. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35, 226-247.
5.
BennerP. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.
6.
BennerP.SutphenM.LeonardV.DayL. (2009). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BennerP.TannerC.CheslaC. (2009). Expertise in nursing practice caring, clinical judgment and ethics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
8.
BremnerM. N.AduddellK. F.AmasonJ. S. (2008). Evidence-based practices related to the human patient simulator and first year baccalaureate nursing students’ anxiety. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 12(1). Retrieved from http://ojni.org/12_1/bremner.html.
9.
BurbachB. E. (2013). Preferred thinking style, cue recognition, processing and response by baccalaureate nursing students during high fidelity patient simulation (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Dissertation Abstracts International. (AAI3578504)
10.
CatoM.LasaterK.PeeplesA. I. (2009). Student nurses’ self-assessment of their simulation experiences. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30, 105-108.
11.
CheungR. Y. M.AuT. K. (2011). Nursing students’ anxiety and clinical performance. Journal of Nursing Education, 50, 286-289.
12.
ClossS. J.CashK.BarrB.BriggsM. (2005). Cues for the identification of pain in nursing home residents. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42, 3-12.
13.
DalyW. M. (2001). The development of an alternative method in the assessment of critical thinking as an outcome of nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36, 120-130.
14.
DunckerK. (1926). A qualitative (experimental and theoretical) study of productive thinking (solving comprehensible problems). Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 33, 642-708.
15.
EndacottR.ScholesJ.BuykxP.CooperS.KinsmanL.McConnell-HenryT. (2010). Final-year nursing students’ ability to assess, detect and act on clinical cues of deterioration in a simulated environment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66, 2722-2731.
16.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 5, 178-186.
17.
FladelandD. M. Y. (1995). Nursing program success, personality and learning style (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from CINAHL AN. (1998072062).
FossumM.AlexanderG. L.GoranssonK. E.EhnforsM.EhrenbergA. (2011). Registered nurses’ thinking strategies on malnutrition and pressure ulcers in nursing homes: A scenario-based think-aloud study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 2425-2435.
20.
GarrettB.MacPheeM.JacksonC. (2010). High fidelity patient simulation: Considerations for effective learning. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31, 309-313.
21.
GazarianP. K.HennemanE. A.ChandlerG. E. (2010). Nurse decision making in the prearrest period. Journal of Nursing Administration, 38, 341-348.
22.
GordonM.MurphyC. P.CandeeD.HiltunenE. (1994). Clinical judgment: An integrated model. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(4), 55-70.
23.
GrayM.SmithL. N. (1999). The professional socialization of diploma of higher education in nursing students (Project 2000): A longitudinal qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 639-647.
24.
GrobeS. J.DrewJ. A.FonteynM. E. (1991). A descriptive analysis of experienced nurses’ clinical reasoning during a planning task. Research in Nursing and Health, 14, 305-314.
25.
GuhdeJ. (2010). Using online exercises and patient simulation to improve students’ decision-making. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31, 387-389.
26.
HuckabayL. M. (2009). Clinical reasoned judgment and the nursing process. Nursing Forum, 44, 72-78.
27.
JeffriesP. R. (2007). Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
28.
KaplanG. G.ConnorA.FerrantiE. P.HolmesL.SpencerL. (2012). Use of an emergency preparedness disaster simulation with undergraduate nursing students. Public Health Nursing, 29, 44-51.
29.
KuoC.TurtonM.ChengS.Lee-HsiehJ. (2011). Using clinical caring journaling: Nursing student and instructor experiences. Journal of Nursing Research, 19, 141-148.
30.
LasaterK. L. (2007). Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. Journal of Nursing Education, 46, 496-503.
31.
LiY.ChenP.TsaiS. (2008). A comparison of the learning styles among different nursing programs in Taiwan: Implications for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 28, 70-76.
32.
MarianiB.CantrellM. A.MeakimC.PrietoP.DreifuerstK. T. (2013). Structured debriefing and students’ clinical judgment abilities in simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(5), e147-e155.
33.
McCormackB. (1993). Intuition: Concept analysis and application to curriculum development. I. Concept analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 1, 339-344.
34.
McCutcheonH. H. I.PincombeJ. (2001). Intuition: An important tool in the practice of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35, 342-348.
35.
McKayK. A. C.BuenJ. E.BohanK. J.MayeJ. P. (2010). Determining the relationship of acute stress, anxiety, and salivary a-Amylase level with performance of student nurse anesthetists during human-based anesthesia simulator training. AANA Journal, 78, 301-309.
36.
MegalM. E.BlackJ.ClarkL.CarstensP.JenkinsL. D.PromesJ. . . . GoodmanT. (2012). Effect of high-fidelity simulation on pediatric nursing students’ anxiety. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8, e419-e428.
37.
MerrimanC. D.StaytL. C.RickettsB. (2014). Comparing the effectiveness of clinical simulation versus didactic methods to teach undergraduate adult nursing students to recognize and assess the deteriorating patient. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10, e119-e127.
38.
NehringW. M.LashleyF. R. (2009). High-fidelity patient simulation in nursing education. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
39.
NielsenB.HarderN. (2013). Causes of student anxiety during simulation: What the literature says. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(11), e507-e512.
OhrlingK.HallbergI. R. (2001). The meaning of preceptorship: Nurses’ lived experience of being a preceptor. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33, 530-540.
42.
PaciniR.EpsteinS. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972-987.
43.
PorockD.OliverD. P. (2007). Recognizing dying by staff in long-term care. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, 95, 270-278.
44.
PottierP.HardouinJ. B.HodgesB. D.PistoriusM. A.ConnaultJ.DurantC. . . . PlanchonB. (2010). Exploring how students think: A new method combining think-aloud and concept mapping protocols. Medical Education, 44, 926-935.
45.
PretzJ. E.FolseV. N. (2011). Nursing experience and preference for intuition in decision making. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 2878-2889.
46.
PurlingA.KingL. (2012). A literature review: Graduate nurses’ preparedness for recognizing and responding to the deteriorating patient. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 3451-3465.
47.
RewL.BarrowE. M. (2007). Intuition in nursing, a generation of studying the phenomenon. Advances in Nursing Science, 30, E15-E25.
48.
RossA. J.AndersonJ. E.KodateN.ThomasL.ThompsonK.ThomasB. . . . JayeP. (2013). Simulation training for improving quality of care for older people: An independent evaluation of an innovative programme for inter-professional education. BMJ Quality and Safety, 22, 495-505.
49.
Ruth-SahdL. A. (2011). Student nurse dyads create a community of learning: Proposing a holistic clinical education theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67, 2445-2454.
50.
Ruth-SahdL. A.HendyH. M. (2005). Predictors of novice nurses’ use of intuition to guide patient care decisions. Journal of Nursing Education, 44, 450-458.
51.
SamuelsJ. G.LeveilleD. M. (2010). Senior nursing students’ clinical judgments in pain management. Nurse Educator, 35, 220-224.
52.
SladekR. M.BondM. J.PhillipsP. A. (2008). Why don’t doctors wash their hands? A correlational study of thinking styles and hand hygiene. American Journal of Infection Control, 36, 399-406.
53.
SladekR. M.BondM. J.PhillipsP. A. (2010). Age and gender differences in preferences for rational and experiential thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 907-911.
54.
SmithA. (2009). Exploring the legitimacy of intuition as a form of nursing knowledge. Nursing Standard, 23, 35-40.
55.
StroupC. (2014). Simulation usage in nursing fundamentals: Integrative literature review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10(3), e155-e164.
56.
TannerC. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45, 204-211.
57.
WestfallU. E.TannerC. A.PutzierD.PadrickK. P. (1986). Activating clinical inferences: A component of diagnostic reasoning in nursing. Research in Nursing & Health, 9, 269-277.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
