AlonsoS.CabrerizoF.Herrera-ViedmaE.HerreraF. (2010). hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics, 82, 391-400.
2.
AlonsoS.CabrerizoF. J.Herrera-ViedmaE.HerreraF. (2009). h-index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273-289.
3.
BornmannL.Hans-DieterD. (2007). What do we know about the h index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1381-1385.
4.
CostasR.BordonsM. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 193-203.
5.
EggheL. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69, 131-152.
HirschJ. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569-16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102
JinB. (2006). h-index: An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus, 1(1), 8-9.
11.
JinB. (2007a). The AR-index: Complementing the h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 3(1), 6.
12.
JinB. (2007b). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52, 855-863.
13.
RousseauR. (2006). New developments related to the Hirsch index. Science Focus, 1(4), 23-25.
14.
SaleemT. (2011). The Hirsch index—A play on numbers or a true appraisal of academic output?International Archives of Medicine, 4, 25. doi:10.1186/1755-7682-4-25
15.
ThorA.BornmannL. (n. d.) Web application to calculate the single publication h index (and further metrics) based on Google Scholar. Retrieved from http://labs.dbs.uni-leipzig.de/gsh/
16.
WendlM. C. (2007). H-index: However ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403.
17.
ZhangC. T. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PloS One, 4(5), e5429. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005429