Breast cancer is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. A strong association exists between survival and early detection through regular mammography. Impoverished women underuse this life-saving screening, resulting in a disproportionate cancer burden. The study purpose is to discover the process of rarely or never-screened women’s mammography-screening decisions. The sample consists of five rural, low-income, uninsured, and rarely or never-screened women. Grounded theory methodology is used to generate a new theoretical explanation of mammography-screening decision making. Findings include the central conceptual categories, intuitive dominance and intuitive certainty, which contribute toward an intuitive decision-making default. This intuitive thinking style weaves throughout two interrelated categories: (a) scarce, supportive, relational resources for learning and (b) dichotomous health care—seeking behaviors. Implications focus on a nontraditional client assessment whereby nurses can facilitate relational-based knowledge construction. Recommendations for future research include examination of the process of integrating intuition with reasoned thought for more fully informed decisions.
Ackerson, K., & Preston, S.D. ( 2009). A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 1130-1140.
2.
American Cancer Society. (2009). Cancer reference information-All about breast cancer: Overview. Available from http://www.cancer.org
3.
Bandura, A. ( 1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
4.
Barr, J.K., Giannotti, T.E., Van Hoof, T.J., Mongoven, J., & Curry, M. ( 2008). Understanding barriers to participation in mammography by women with disabilities. American Journal of Health Promotion , 22, 381-385.
5.
Belenky, M.F., Bond, L., & Weinstock, J. ( 1997). A tradition that has no name: Public homeplaces and the development of people, families, and communities. New York : Basic Books.
6.
Case, D.O., Andrews, J.E., Johnson, J.D., & Allard, S.L. ( 2005). Avoiding versus seeking: The relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93, 353-362.
7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2008). 2008-2009 National breast and cervical cancer early detection program fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/about.htm
8.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. ( 2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
9.
Cornwell, E.Y., & Waite, L.J. ( 2009). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 50, 31-48.
10.
Coronado, G.D., Thompson, B., & Chen, L. ( 2009). Socio-demographic correlates of cancer screening services among Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites in a rural setting, American Journal of Health Behavior, 33, 181-191.
11.
Coughlin, S.S., Leadbetter, S., Richards, T., & Sabatino, S.A. (2008). Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Social Science & Medicine , 66, 260-275.
12.
Dane, E., & Pratt, M.G. ( 2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision-making . Academy of Management Review, 32, 33-54.
13.
Gigerenzer, G. ( 2007). Gut feelings. New York: Viking.
14.
Goleman, D. ( 2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships . New York: Bantam Books.
15.
Jennings-Sanders, A. ( 2009). Measuring self-efficacy for mammography screening in older African American women. ABNF Journal, 20(2), 49-52.
16.
Katapodi, M.C., Dodd, M.J., Lee, K.A., & Facione, N.C. ( 2009). Underestimation of breast cancer risk: Influence on screening behavior. Oncology Nursing Forum, 36, 306-314.
17.
Katapodi, M.C., Lee, K.A., Facione, N.C., & Dodd, M.J. ( 2004). Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review . Preventive Medicine, 38, 388-402.
18.
Lee, H. J., & Winters, C. A. (Eds.). (2006). Rural nursing (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
19.
Litaker, D., & Tomolo, A. ( 2007). Association of contextual factors and breast cancer screening: Finding new targets to promote early detection. Journal of Women’s Health, 16, 36-45.
20.
McAlearney, A.S., Reeves, K.W., Tatum, C., & Paskett, E.D. ( 2007). Cost as a barrier to screening mammography among underserved women. Ethnicity and Health, 12, 189-203.
21.
Meissner, H.I., Breen, N., Taubman, M.L., Vernon, S.W., & Graubard, B.L. (2007). Which women aren’t getting mammograms and why? (United States). Cancer Causes Control, 18, 61-70.
22.
Merriam, S.B. ( 1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Merriam, S.B. ( 2002). Assessing and evaluating qualitative research. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 18-33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Merriam, S.B. ( 2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Naito, M., O’Callaghan, F.V., & Morrissey, S. ( 2009). Understanding women’s mammography intentions: A theory-based investigation. Women & Health, 49, 101-118.
26.
National Cancer Institute. (2007). What you need to know about breast cancer. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/wyntk/breast/page5
27.
National Cancer Institute. (2008). Cancer health disparities fact sheet: Questions and answers. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/cancerhealth-disparities
28.
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, & Department of Health and Human Services. (2007). Cancer trends progress report-2007 update. Available from http://progressreport.cancer.gov
29.
O’Neil, S.C., Bowling, J.M., Brewer, N.T., Lipkus, I.M., Skinner, C.S., Strigo, T.S., et al. (2008). Intentions to maintain adherence to mammography . Journal of Women’s Health, 17, 1133-1141.
30.
Park, A.N., Buist, D.S., Tiro, J.A., & Taplin, S.H. ( 2008). Mediating factors in the relationship between income and mammography use in low-income insured women. Journal of Women’s Health, 17, 1371-1378.
31.
Pasick, R.J., & Burke, N.J. ( 2008). A critical review of theory in breast cancer screening promotion across cultures. Annual Review of Public Health , 29, 351-368.
32.
Peek, M.E., Sayaa, J.V., & Markwardt, R. ( 2008). Fear, fatalism, and breast cancer screening in low-income African-American women: The role of clinicians and the health care system . Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23, 1847-1853.
33.
Ratzan, S.C., & Parker, R.M. ( 2000). Introduction. In C. R. Selden, M. Zom, S. C. Ratzan, & R. M. Parker (Eds.), National Library of Medicine current bibliographies of medicine: Health literacy (NLM Pub. No. CBM 2000-1). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
34.
Ruston, A. ( 2009). Isolation: A threat and means of spatial control: Living with risk in a deprived neighborhood. Health, Risk, and Society , 11, 257-268.
35.
Sauter, V.L. ( 1999). Intuitive decision-making. Communications of the ACM, 42(6), 109-115.
36.
Schueler, K.M., Chu, P.W., & Smith-Bindman, R. (2008). Factors associated with mammography utilization: A systematic quantitative review of the literature . Journal of Women’s Health, 17, 1477-1498.
37.
Simmons, J.P., & Nelson, L.D. ( 2006). Intuitive confidence: Choosing between intuitive and non-intuitive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology , 135, 409-428.
38.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D.G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311-322.
39.
Steele, S. ( 2003). A concept analysis of susceptibility: Application of the hybrid model. Nursing Forum, 38(2), 5-11.
40.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Sunstein, C.R. ( 2005). Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 531-573.
42.
Tang, T.S., Patterson, S.K., Roubidoux, M.A., & Duan, L. ( 2009). Women’s mammography experience and its impact to screening adherence. Psycho-Oncology, 18, 727-734.
43.
Volbrecht, R.M. ( 2002). Nursing ethics: Communities in dialogue. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
