The interview is a staple of many qualitative approaches. Although textbooks offer extensive guidance to researchers about conducting interviews, less guidance is available about problematic interviewee behaviors, such as flattery or statements indicative of social desirability response bias. In this study, a secondary analysis of 22 phenomenological interview transcripts, we sought to examine problematic interviewee behaviors. More than 300 pages of typed text were subjected to line-by-line scrutiny, yielding only six potential instances of the phenomenon. Each could be interpreted several ways. What appeared to be flattery could also be perceived as simple gratitude or appreciation. We concluded that problematic behavior was rare in this data set.
Beauvois, M. (2002, Spring). The experience of graduate students in a department of modern foreign languages. Paper presented at Faculty Colloquium, Department of Modern Foreign Languages, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
2.
Berreman, G. D. (1962). Behind many masks: Ethnography and impression management in a Himalayan village (Monograph 4). New York: Society for Applied Anthropology.
3.
Cooley, C. H. (1922). Human nature and the social order. New York:Charles Scribner’s Sons.
4.
Cutcliffe, J. R. (2002). Ethics committees, vulnerable groups and paternalism: The case for considering the benefits of participating in qualitative research interviews. In J. Dooher & R. Byrt (Eds.), Empowerment and participation: Power, influence and control in health care (pp. 204-219). London: Quay Books.
5.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.).(2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Dingwall, R. (1997). Accounts, interviews, and observations. In G. Miller & R. Dingwall (Eds.), Context and method in qualitative research (pp. 51-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. New York: Seabury.
9.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
10.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
11.
Hutchinson, S., & Wilson, S. K. (1992). Validity threats in scheduled semistructured research interviews. Nursing Research, 41, 117-119.
12.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Lawler, J. (1993). Behind the screens: Nursing, somology, and the problem of the body. Redwood City, CA: Benjamin-Cummings.
14.
Locker, D. (1981). Symptoms and illness: The cognitive organization of disorder. London: Tavistock.
15.
Lipson, J., & Meleis, A. (1989). Methodological issues in research with immigrants. Medical Anthropology, 12, 103-115.
16.
Lipson, J., & Meleis, A. (1999). Research with immigrants and refugees. In A. Hinshaw, S. Feetham, & J. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of clinical nursing research (pp. 87-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Mazeland, H., & ten Have, P. (1996). Essential tensions in (semi-) open research interviews. In I. Maso & F. Wester (Eds.), The deliberate dialogue: Qualitative perspectives on the interview (pp. 87-113). Brussels, Belgium: VUB University Press. Retrieved January 9, 2004, from www.pscw.uva.nl/emca/ET.htm
18.
Muff, J. (1988). Women’s issues in nursing: Socialization, sexism and stereotyping. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
19.
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.
21.
Rapley, T. J. (2001). The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analyzing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1, 303-323.
22.
Shattell, M. M. (2002a). “Eventually it’ll be over:” The dialectic between confinement and freedom in the phenomenal world of the hospitalized patient. In S. P. Thomas & H. R. Pollio (Eds.), Listening to patients: A phenomenological approach to nursing research and practice (pp. 214-236). New York: Springer.
23.
Shattell, M. M. (2002b). “Make them your friend”: A phenomenological study of patients’ experience soliciting nursing care in the hospital setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
24.
Shiner, M., & Newburn, T. (1997). Definitely, may be not? The normalization of recreational drug use amongst young people. Sociology, 31, 511-529.
25.
Thomas, S. P., & Pollio, H. R. (2002). Listening to patients: A phenomenological approach to nursing research and practice. New York: Springer.
