Microenterprise programs aim to foster self-employment among the poor, those on welfare, and the unemployed. The only experimental test of their impact is the Unemployment Insurance Self-Employment Demonstration (UISED). UISED did shorten unemployment spells, but most other impacts were small and the most disadvantaged did not choose to participate. Although UISED provides some weak evidence that long-term income support, long-term work-search waivers, and on-call advice may increase total employment (but perhaps not self-employment) more than capital infusions and up-front classes, UISED does not reveal the best design for microenterprise programs or whether such programs are good social investments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balkin, S.1989. Self-employment and low-income people. New York: Praeger.
2.
[.arrowhorizex][.arrowhorizex][.arrowhorizex]. 1992. Entrepreneurial activities of homeless men. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare19 (4): 129-150.
3.
Banerjee, M. M.1998. Micro-enterprise development: A response to poverty. Journal of Community Practice5 (1/2): 63-83.
4.
Bates, T.1995. Why do minority business development programs generate so little minority business development?Economic Development Quarterly9 (1): 3-14.
5.
[.arrowhorizex][.arrowhorizex][.arrowhorizex]. 1997. Race, self-employment, and upward mobility: An illusive American Dream. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
Bates, T., and L. J. Servon. 1998. Microenterprise as an exit route from poverty: Recommendations for programs and policy makers. Journal of Urban Affairs20 (4): 419-441.
7.
Bendick, M., and M. L. Egan. 1987. Transfer payment diversion for small business development: British and French experience. Industrial and Labor Relations Review40 (4): 528-542.
8.
Benus, J. M., T. P. Johnson, M. Wood, N. Grover, and T. Shen. 1995. Self-employment programs: A new reemployment strategy, final report on the UI self-employment demonstration (Unemployment Insurance Occasional Paper 95-4). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
9.
Benus, J. M., M. Wood, and N. Grover. 1994. A comparative analysis of the Washington and Massachusetts UI self-employment demonstrations (Unemployment Insurance Occasional Paper 94-3). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
10.
Berger, A. N., and G. F. Udell. 1998. The economics of small-business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance22:613-673.
11.
Clark, P., and T. Huston. 1993. Assisting the smallest businesses: Assessing microenterprise development as a strategy for boosting poor communities. An interim report. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
12.
Dennis, W. J.1998. Business regulation as an impediment to the transition from welfare to self-employment. Journal of Labor Research19 (2): 263-276.
13.
Drury, D., S. Walsh, and M. Strong. 1994. Evaluation of the EDWAA job creation demonstration (Research and Evaluation Report Series 94-G). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
14.
Dunn, E.1997. Diversification in the household economic portfolio. Paper prepared for the AIMS project, USAID/G/EG/MD, Management Systems International, Washington, DC.
15.
Edgcomb, E., J. Klein, and P. Clark. 1996. The practice of microenterprise in the U.S.: Strategies, costs, and effectiveness. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
16.
Else, J. F., and S. Raheim. 1992. AFDC clients as entrepreneurs: Self-employment offers an important option. Public Welfare50 (4): 36-41.
17.
Evans, D. S., and B. Jovanovic. 1989. An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy97 (4): 808-827.
18.
FIELD. 1998. An introduction to FIELD: Mission, goals, and policies. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
19.
Friedman, R. E., B. Grossman, and P. Sahay. 1995. Building assets: Self employment for welfare recipients. Overview of the findings from the Self Employment Investment Demonstration (SEID).Washington, DC: Corporation for Enterprise Development.
20.
Gittinger, J. P.1982. Economic analysis of agricultural projects (2d ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
Hausman, J. A., and D. A. Wise. 1985. Technical problems in social experimentation: Cost versus ease of analysis. In Social Experimentation, edited by J. A. Hausman and D. A. Wise, 187-219. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Heckman, J. J., and J. A. Smith. 1995. Assessing the case for social experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives9 (2): 85-110.
23.
Himes, C., with L. J. Servon. 1998. Measuring client success: An evaluation of Acción's impact on microenterprises in the United States (U.S. Issues Series No. 2). Boston: Acción International.
24.
Holtz-Eakin, D., D. Joulfaian, and H. S. Rosen. 1994. Sticking it out: Entrepreneurial survival and liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy102 (1): 53-75.
25.
Kramer, M. S., and S. H. Shapiro. 1984. Scientific challenges in the application of randomized trials. Journal of the American Medical Association252 (19): 2739-2745.
26.
Lipton, M., and M. Ravallion. 1995. Poverty and policy. In Handbook of development economics (Vol. IIIB), edited by Jere Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan, 2553-2657. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27.
Manski, C. F.1990. Where we are in the evaluation of federal social welfare programs. Focus12 (4): 1-5.
28.
McCloskey, D. N.1998. The rhetoric of economics (2d ed.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
29.
McCloskey, D. N., and S. T. Ziliak. 1996. The standard error of regressions. Journal of Economic Literature34:97-114.
30.
Meyerhoff, D.1997. Federal funding opportunities for microenterprise programs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship2 (2): 99-109.
31.
Morduch, J.1998. Does microfinance really help the poor? New evidence from flagship programs in Bangladesh. Manuscript, Princeton University.
32.
Mosley, P., and D. Hulme. 1998. Microenterprise finance: Is there a conflict between growth and poverty alleviation?World Development26 (5): 783-790.
33.
Raheim, S.1997. Problems and prospects of self-employment as an economic independence option for welfare recipients. Social Work42 (1): 44-53.
34.
Raheim, S., and C. F. Alter. 1998. Self-employment as a social and economic development intervention for recipients of AFDC. Journal of Community Practice5 (1/2): 41-61.
35.
RESULTS International. 1996. The microcredit summit declaration and plan of action. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship1 (2): 131-176.
36.
Schreiner, M.1999. Self-employment, microenterprise, and the poorest Americans. Social Service Review73 (4).
37.
Servon, L. J.1997. Microenterprise programs in U.S. inner cities: Economic development or social welfare?Economic Development Quarterly11 (2): 166-180.
38.
[.arrowhorizex][.arrowhorizex][.arrowhorizex]. 1998. Credit and social capital: The community development potential of U.S. microenterprise programs. Housing Policy Debate9 (1): 115-149.
39.
Severens, C. A., and A. K. Kays. 1997. 1996 directory of U.S. microenterprise programs. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
40.
Sherraden, M.1991. Assets and the poor: A new American welfare policy.Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
41.
Sherraden, M. S., C. K. Sanders, and M. Sherraden. 1998. From the eyes of the entrepreneurs: Microenterprise as an anti-poverty strategy (Report to the Self-Employment Learning Project). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
42.
Smith, D.1998. Explaining gender differences in earnings among the self-employed. Manuscript, Pepperdine University.
43.
Soloman, L. D.1992. Microenterprise: Human reconstruction in America's inner cities. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy15 (1): 191-221.
44.
Spalter-Roth, R., E. Soto, and L. Zandniapour. 1994. Micro-enterprise and women: The viability of self-employment as a strategy for alleviating poverty. Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.
45.
Spalter-Roth, R. M., H. I. Hartmann, and L. B. Shaw. 1993. Exploring the characteristics of self-employment and part-time work among women. Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.
46.
Taub, R. P.1998. Making the adaptation across cultures and societies: A report on an attempt to clone the Grameen Bank in Southern Arkansas. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship3 (1): 53-69.
47.
U.S. Newswire. 1999. Clinton remarks at microenterprise event, 5 February.
48.
Vroman, W.1997. Self-employment assistance: Revised report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
49.
Williams, D. R.1998. Consequences of self-employment for women and men in the United States: Preliminary results. Manuscript, Kent State University.
