Reducing tobacco use, especially cigarette smoking, is a public health priority. The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST) was initiated in 1991 to prevent and reduce tobacco use primarily through policy-based approaches to alter the social-political environment. This article describes the conceptual design, research framework, evaluation components, and analytic strategies that are guiding the evaluation of this demonstration research endeavor. The ASSIST evaluation is a unique analysis of the complex relationships between the social context, public health activity at the state level, tobacco use, and individual behavior. The measures of tobacco control activity developed for this evaluation may be useful in ongoing national cancer control surveillance efforts, and the lessons learned will enhance the development of tobacco control programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aguinaga, S., M. Macdonald, M. Traynor, M. Begay, and S. Glantz. 1995. Undermining popular government: Tobacco industry political expenditures in California. 1993-1994. UCSF IHPS Monograph Series.
2.
Alciati, M. H., M. Frosh, S. B. Green, R. C. Brownson, P. H. Fisher, R. Hobart, A. Roman, R. C. Sciandra, and D. M. Shelton. 1998. State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: Measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system. Tobacco Control7 (4): 345-353.
3.
Blackburn, H., R. Luepker, F. G. Kline, N. Bracht, R. Carlaw, D. Jacobs, M. Mittlemark, L. Stauffer, and H. L. Taylor. 1984. The Minnesota Heart Health Program: A research and demonstration project in cardiovascular disease prevention. In Behavioral health: A handbook of health enhancement and disease prevention, edited by J. D. Matarazzo, J. A. Herd, N. E. Miller, and S. M. Weiss, 1171-1178. New York: John Wiley.
4.
Bracht, N., ed. 1990. Health promotion at the community level. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Burns, D. M., L. Garfinkel, and J. M. Samet. 1997. Introduction, summary, and conclusion. In Changes in cigarette-related disease and their implication for prevention and control. Smoking and tobacco control monographs-8. NIH Publication No. 97-4213. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1995. Trends in smoking initiation among adolescents and young adults—United States, 1980-1989. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report44 (28): 521-523.
7.
Cohen, J., and P. Cohen. 1991. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
COMMIT Research Group. 1991. Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): Summary of design and intervention. Journal of the National Cancer Institute83 (22): 1620-1628.
9.
COMMIT Research Group. 1995a. Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year community intervention. American Journal of Public Health85:183-192.
10.
COMMIT Research Group. 1995b. Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): II. Changes in adult cigarette smoking prevalence. American Journal of Public Health85:193-200.
11.
Diez-Roux, A. V.1998. Bring context back into epidemiology: Variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. American Journal of Public Health88:216-222.
12.
Drake, C.1993. Effects of misspecification of the propensity score on estimators of treatment effects. Biometrics49:1231-1236.
13.
Farquhar, J. W., S. P. Fortmann, N. Maccoby, P. D. Wood, W. L. Haskell, C. B. Taylor, J. A. Flora, D. S. Solomon, T. Rogers, E. Adler, P. Breitrose, and L. Weiner. 1984. The Stanford Five City Project: An overview. In Behavioral health: A handbook of health enhancement and disease prevention, edited by J. D. Matarazzo, J. A. Herd, N. E. Miller, and S. M. Weiss, 1154-1165. New York: John Wiley.
14.
Gail, M. H., S. D. Mark, R. J. Carroll, S. B. Green, and D. Pee. 1996. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials. Statistics in Medicine15:1069-1092.
15.
Goldstein, A. O., and N. S. Bearman. 1996. State tobacco lobbyists and organizations in the United States: Crossed lines. American Journal of Public Health86:1137-1142.
16.
Graubard, B. I., and Korn, E. L.1996. Modeling the sampling design in the analysis of health surveys. Statistical Methods in Medical Research5:236-281.
17.
Green, L. W., and A. L. McAlister. 1984. Macro-interventions to support health behavior: Some theoretical perspectives and practical reflections. Health Education Quarterly11:322-339.
18.
Greenwald, P., J. W. Cullen, and J. W. McKenna. 1987. Cancer prevention and control: From research through applications. Journal of the National Cancer Institute79:389-400.
19.
Greenwald, P., and E. J. Sondik. 1986. Cancer control objectives for the nation: 1985-2000. National Cancer Institute Monograph. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
20.
Hall, N. G., J. C. Hershey, L. G. Kessler, and R. C. Stoots. 1992. A model for making project funding decisions at the National Cancer Institute. Operations Research40 (6): 1040-1052.
21.
Hansen, R. H.1985 July. The Current Population Survey: Design and methodology. Technical Paper No. 40. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.
22.
Himmerlman, A. T., M. G. Luxenberg, and C. C. Schmitz. 1995. Consortium activities diagnostic survey (CADS): A tool to understand the ways that groups work together. Minneapolis: Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota.
23.
Kessler, L. G., M. Carlyn, R. Windsor, and L. Biesiadecki. 1996 April. Evaluation of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study. In Health Survey Research Methods Conference Proceedings, edited by R. Warnecke, 215-20. DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 96-1013. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
24.
Lando, H. A., T. F. Pechacek, P. L. Pirie, D. M. Murray, M. B. Mittlemark, E. Lichtenstein, F. Northwehr, and C. Gray. 1995. Changes in adult cigarette smoking in the Minnesota Health Program. American Journal of Public Health5 (2): 201-208.
25.
Manley, M. S., W. Lynn, R. P. Epps, T. Glynn, and D. Shopland. 1998. The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study for cancer prevention: An overview. Tobacco Control6 (suppl 2): S5-S11.
26.
Manley, M. W., J. P. Pierce, E. A. Gilpin, B. Rosbrook, C. Berry, and L.-P. Wan. 1998. Impact of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study on cigarette consumption. Tobacco Control6 (suppl 2): S12-S16.
27.
McKinlay, J. B.1993. The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy. Social Science and Medicine36:109-117.
28.
McKinlay, J. B.1996. More appropriate evaluation methods for community-level health interventions: Introduction to the special issue. Evaluation Review20 (3): 237-243.
29.
National Cancer Institute. 1991. Strategies to control tobacco use in the United States: A blueprint for public health action in the 1990's. Smoking and tobacco control monographs-1. NIH Publication No. 92-3316. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
30.
National Cancer Institute. 1995. Community-based interventions for smokers: The COMMIT field experiences. Smoking and tobacco control monographs-6. NIH Publication No. 95-4028. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
31.
National Cancer Institute, State Cancer Legislative Database (SCLD). (n.d.). [Note: SCLD Updates is published quarterly and is available on http://dccps.nci.nih.gov/SCLD]
32.
Office on Smoking and Health. 1982. The health consequences of smoking, a report of the surgeon general. DHHS Publication No. 82-50179. Washington, DC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
33.
Pfeffermann, D., C. J. Skinner, D. J. Holmes, H. Goldstein, and J. Rasbash. 1998. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology60:23-40, Part 1.
34.
Pierce, J. P., N. Evans, A. J. Farkas, S. W. Cavin, C. Berry, M. Krammer, S. Kealey, B. Rosbrook, and W. Choi. 1994. Tobacco use in California. An evaluation of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989-1993. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego.
35.
Pomrehn, P., R. Sciandra, R. Shipley, W. Lynn, and H. Lando. 1990-91. Enhancing resources for smoking cessation through community interventions: COMMIT as a prototype. International Quarterly of Community Health Education11 (3): 259-269.
36.
Sallis, J., and N. Owen. “Ecological models.”1997. In Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice. 2nd edition, edited by K. Glantz, F. M. Lewis, and B. K. Rimer. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Samuels, B., and S. Glantz. 1991. Tobacco control activities and tobacco industry's response in California communities. 1990-1991. UCSF IHPS Monograph Series.
38.
Samuels, M.1986. Use of analysis of covariance in clinical trials: A clarification. Letter to the editor. Controlled Clinical Trials7:325-329.
39.
SAS Institute, Inc.1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. 4th edition, volume 2, p. 1400-1400. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
40.
Schwartz, J. L.1987. Review and evaluation of smoking control methods: The United States and Canada, 1978-1985. NIH Publication No. 87-2940. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.
41.
Shopland, D. R.1993. Smoking control in the 1990's: A National cancer institute model for change. American Journal of Public Health83 (9): 1208-1211.
42.
Shopland, D. R., A. M. Hartman, J. T. Gibson, M. D. Mueller, L. G. Kessler, and W. R. Lynn. 1996. Cigarette smoking among U.S. adults by state and region: Estimates from the Current Population Survey. Journal of the National Cancer Institute88:748-758.
43.
Stotts, R. C., L. G. Kessler, J. C. Hershey, N. G. Hall, and J. G. Gruman. 1994. Awarding contracts at the national institutes of health: A sensitivity analysis of the critical parameters. International Transactions in Operational Research: A Journal of the International Federation of Operational Research Societies1 (2): 117-124.
44.
Thompson, B., E. F. Hunkeler, L. Biener, C. T. Orleans, and E. J. Perzez-Stable. 1991. Interdependence and synergy among smoking control activities. In Strategies to control tobacco use in the United States: A blueprint for public health action in the 1990's. Smoking and tobacco control monographs-1. NIH Publication No. 92-3316. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
45.
The Tobacco Institute. 1993. Burden on tobacco: Historical compilation 1992. New York: The Tobacco Institute.
46.
Van de Ven, A., and D. Ferry. 1980. Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: John Wiley.
47.
Von Bertalanffy, L.1968. General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.
48.
Wallach, L., and L. Dorfman. 1996. Media advocacy: A strategy for advancing policy and promoting health. Health Education Quarterly23 (3): 293-317.
49.
Wun, L.-M., and L. Kessler. 1995. On the power of assessing the effectiveness of the American Stop Smoking Intervention. Paper presented at the 1995 Joint Statistical Meetings, Orlando, FL.
