This article presents an innovative methodology for evaluating strategic planning goals in a public agency. Computer-coded content analysis was used to evaluate attitudes expressed in about 28,000 on-line news media stories about the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service and its strategic goal of conservation leadership. Three dimensions of conservation leadership were distinguished and evaluated separately: stewardship and ethics, use of collaborative planning and decision making, and use of science-based management. Analysis of on-line news media text is a way to quickly and efficiently assess the views of a wide range of stakeholders captured in the news media.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ader, C. R.1995. A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72 (2): 300-311.
2.
Anderson, A.1993. Source-media relations: The production of the environmental agenda. In The mass media and environmental issues, edited by A. Hansen, 51-68. New York: Leicester University Press.
3.
Atwater, T.
, M. B. Salwen, and R. B. Anderson. 1985. Media agenda-setting with environmental issues. Journalism Quarterly62:395-397.
4.
Conservation Fund
. 1990. Conservation leadership project: Final report. Arlington, VA: Conservation Fund.
5.
Cornett, Z. J.1995. Birch seeds, leadership, and a relationship with the land. Journal of Forestry93 (9): 6-11.
6.
Fan, D. P.1988. Predictions of public opinion from the mass media: Computer content analysis and mathematical modeling. New York: Greenwood.
7.
Fan, D. P.
, and D. N. Bengston. 1997. Public debates shaping forestry's future: An analysis. Final report prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Office of Com munication. St. Paul, MN: InfoTrend and North Central Research Station.
8.
Fan, D. P.
, and L. Norem. 1992. The media and the fate of the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law17:39-70.
9.
Fan, D. P.
, and A. R. Tims1989. The impact of the news media on public opinion: American presidential election, 1987-1988. International Journal of Public Opinion Research1 (2): 151-163.
10.
Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team (FEMAT)
. 1993. Forest ecosystem management: An ecological, economic, and social assessment. Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
11.
Fortner, R. W.
, V. J. Mayer, C. C. Brothers, and F. R. Lichtoppler. 1991. Knowledge about the Great Lakes environment: A comparison of publics. Journal of Great Lakes Research17 (3): 394-402.
12.
Frederick/Schneiders
. 1994. Results from a nationwide survey on forest management. Washington, DC: Frederick/Schneiders.
13.
Gamson, W. A.
, and A. Modigliani. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructivist approach. American Journal of Sociology95 (1): 1-37.
14.
Gongla-Coppinger, L.
, ed. 1995. Directory of on-line services, 1995 edition. Dayton, OH: LEXIS-NEXIS.
15.
Gordon, J. C.
, and J. K. Berry. 1993. Environmental leadership: Who and why. In Environmental leadership: Developing effective skills and styles, edited by J. K. Berry and J. C. Gordon, 3-12. Washington, DC: Island Press.
16.
Hammond, B.1994. Forest Service Values Poll questions: Results and analysis. Report prepared for U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Tampa, FL: Kaset International.
17.
Hansen, A.1993. Greenpeace and press coverage of environmental issues. In The mass media and environmental issues, edited by A. Hansen, 150-178. New York: Leicester University Press.
18.
Hauss, D.1993. Measuring the impact of public relations. Public Relations Journal49 (Feb.): 14-21.
19.
Lewis, B. J.
, and P. V. Ellefson. 1993. Staff mediated information flows to forest policy committees in state legislatures: An assessment and evaluation. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, 601-1993. St. Paul: University of Minnesota.
20.
Lindenmann, W. K.1983. Content analysis. Public Relations Journal39 (July): 24-26.
21.
Orenstein, R. M.1996. Fulltext sources on-line, Vol. 8, Issue 2. Needham Heights, MA: Bibliodata.
22.
Ostman, R. E.
, and J. L. Parker. 1987. A public's environmental information sources and evaluations of mass media. Journal of Environmental Education18 (2): 9-17.
23.
Rockwell, H. W. Jr.1991. Leadership (commentary). Journal of Forestry89 (2): 3-3.
24.
Roper Starch Worldwide
. 1994. From anxiety toward action: A status report on conservation in 1994, The Times Mirror Magazines National Environmental Forum Survey. New York: Roper Starch Worldwide.
25.
Shindler, B.
, B. Steel, and P. List. 1996. Public judgments of adaptive management: A response from forest communities. Journal of Forestry94 (6): 4-12.
26.
Smith, D.
, and L. Clark. 1994. Hot views on hot topics: National survey gauges public views on forests, wildfire, and management. American Forests100 (11-12): 3-3.
27.
Smith, R. D.1997. Letting America speak. Audacity: The Magazine of Business History5 (2): 50-61.
28.
Snow, D.1992. Inside the environmental movement: Meeting the leadership challenge.Washington, DC: Island Press.
29.
Steel, B.
, B. Shindler, and M. Brunson. In press. Social acceptability of ecosystem management in the Pacific Northwest. In Ecosystems management: A social science perspective, edited by D. L. Soden, B. L. Lamb, and J. R. Tennert. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
30.
Thomas, J. W.1992. On being professional: The responsibilities of a worthy vocation. Journal of Forestry90 (2): 12-16.
31.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service
. 1993. Mission, vision, and guiding principles. Poster, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
32.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service
. 1994a. The Forest Service ethics and course to the future. FS-567. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service
. 1994b. A strategic communication plan: Conservation leadership for the 21st century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
34.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service
. 1997. Report of the Forest Service, fiscal year 1996: Collaborative stewardship. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35.
Weber, R. P.1990. Basic content analysis2d ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Wilson, K. M.1995. Mass media as sources of global warming knowledge. Mass Comm Review22 (1/2): 75-89.
