Bangert-Drowns, R.L.1988. The effects of school-based substance abuse education—A meta-analysisJournal of Drug Education18:243-65
2.
. Botvin, G.J., E. Baker, L. Dusenberry, E.M. Botvin, and T. Diaz.1995. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a White middle class populationJournal of the American Medical Association273 (11): 1106-12
3.
. Brown, J. H., ed. 1996. Advances in confluent education, Vol. 1: Integrating consciousness for human change. Greenwich, CT: JAI .
4.
Brown, J.H., and M. D'Emidio-Caston.1995. On becoming at risk through drug education: How symbolic policies and their practices affect studentsEvaluation Review19 (4) 451-92
5.
. Brown, J.H., M. D'Emidio-Caston, and J. Horowitz.1996. Drug education: What works, what doesn't. Panel Members: Presented at a Congressional Forum, sponsored by the Drug Policy Foundation, May, Washington, DC
6.
Brown, J.H., M. D'Emidio-Caston, and J. Pollard.1997. Students and substances: Social power in drug educationEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (EEPA) 19(1): 65-82
7.
. Brown, J.H., and J.E. Horowitz.1993. Deviance & deviants: Why adolescent substance use prevention programs do not workEvaluation Review17(5): 529-55
8.
. Bruvold, W.H.1990. A meta analysis of the California school-based risk reduction programJournal of Drug Education20 (2): 139-52
9.
. Clayton, R.R., A.M. Catarello, and B.M. Johnstone.1996. The effectiveness of drug abuse resistance education (Project D.A.R.E.): 5-year follow up resultsJournal of Preventive Medicine25 (3): 1-12
10.
. D'Emidio-Caston, M. , and J. Brown.1998. The other side of the story: Student narratives on the California Drug, Alcohol, and Tobacco Education ProgramsEvaluation Review22 (1): 93-115
11.
. Dukes, R.L., Ullman, J.B., and Stein, J.A. (1996). Three year follow-up of drug abuse resistance education (D.A.R.E. Evaluation Review, 20 (1): 49-66
12.
. Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politicsChicago: University of Illinois Press.
13.
Ennett, S.T., N.S. Tobler, C.L. Ringwalt, and R.L. Flewelling .1994. How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project D.A.R.E. outcome evaluationsAmerican Journal of Public Health84 (9): 1394-1401
14.
. Glass, S.1997. Don't you D.A.R.E: America's top drug prevention program doesn't work. But you'd better not say soThe New Republic , March 3, 18
15.
. German, D.M.1996Do school-based social skills training programs prevent alcohol use among young people?Addiction Research4 (2): 191-210
16.
. —. 1998. The irrelevance of evidence in the development of school-based drug prevention policy, 1986-1996Evaluation Review22 (1): 116-144
17.
. Hansen, W.B., and J.W. Graham.1991. Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: One-year results of the Adolescent Alcohol Prevention TrialPreventive Medicine20:414-30.
18.
Hawkins, J.D., D.M. Lishner, J.M. Jenson, and R.F. Catalano.1987. Delinquents and drugs: What the evidence suggests about prevention and treatment programming In Youth at high risk for substance abuse, edited by B. S. Brown and A. R. Mills, 81-131. (DHHS Publication no. ADM 87-1537; reprinted 1990 as ADM 90-1537). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19.
20.
Johnston, L.D., P.M. O'Malley, and J.G. Bachman.1995. National survey results on drug use from the monitoring the future study, 1975-1994Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
21.
Klitzner, M.D.1987. Part 2: An assessment of the research on school-based prevention programs (Report to Congress and the White House on the nature and effectiveness of federal, state, and local drug prevention/education programsWashington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22.
Kuhn, T.1962. The structure of scientific revolutionsChicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Moscowitz, J.M.1993. Why reports of outcome evaluations are often biased or uninterpretable: Examples from evaluations of drug abuse prevention programsEvaluation and Program Planning16:1-9
24.
. Raven, B.H.1965. Social influence and power In Current studies in social psychology, edited by I. D. Steiner and M. Fishbein, 371-82. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
25.
—. 1993. The bases of power: Origins and recent developmentsJournal of Social Issues49(4): 227-51
26.
. Resnick, M.D., P.S. Bearman, R.W. Blum, K.E. Bauman, K.M. Harris, J. Jones, J. Tabor, T. Beunring, R.E. Sieving, M. Shew, M. Ireland, L.H. Bearinger, and J.R. Udry.1997. Protecting adolescents from harmJournal of the American Medical Association278(10): 823-32
27.
. Robinson, W.S.1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individualsAmerican Sociological Review15:351-7
28.
. Schaps, E., R. DiBartolo, J. Moskowitz, C.S. Palley, and S. Churgin.1981. A review of 127 drug abuse prevention program evaluationsJournal of Drug Issues11:17-43
29.
. Skager, R., and J.H. Brown.Forthcoming. Toward a reformation of drug education In Drug policy: Psychological, philosophical and legal issues , edited by J. Fish.
30.
Tierney, J.P., J. Baldwin-Grossman, and N.L. Resch.1995. Making a difference: An impact study of big brothers/big sistersPhiladelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
31.
Tobler, N.S.1986. Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison groupJournal of Drug Issues16:537-67
32.
. —. 1992. Drug prevention programs can work: Research findingsJournal of Addictive Diseases11 (3): 1-26
33.
. U.S. General Accounting Office.1991. Drug abuse prevention: Federal efforts to identify exemplary programs need stronger designWashington, DC: Author.
34.
—. 1997. Substance abuse and violence prevention: Multiple programs raise questions of efficiency and effectiveness (Testimony provided on June 24). GAO/T HEHS-97-166Washington, DC: Author.
35.
Van Biema, D.1996. Just say life skills: A new antidrug program outstrips D.A.R.ETime, November11, 70.