Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Little attention in the literature on stakeholder shared decision making in program evaluations has been given to involving stakeholders in developing the process of decision making. If stakeholders are not fully involved in developing this process, decisions may be biased and lead to invalid evaluation findings. In this article, the authors present a theoretical model suggesting how stakeholder involvement in establishing the process of decision making in school-conducted needs assessments affects the validity of the selected needs, with validity defined as teacher agreement with the selection of needs. Using LISREL VII, the model was tested using teacher survey data. The findings show that teachers were not heavily involved in developing decision- making processes. However, they agreed with the selected needs, and their involvement in de veloping the decision-making processes accounted for a substantial portion of their agreement.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brandon, P.R. , M.A. Lindberg , and Z. Wang. 1993. Involving program beneficiaries in the early stages of evaluation: Issues of consequential validity and influence . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15:420-8.

Brandon, P.R. , B.J. Newton , and J.W. Harman. 1993. Enhancing validity through beneficiaries' equitable involvement in identifying and prioritizing homeless children's educational problems. Evaluation and Program Planning 16:287-93.

Bridges, E.M. 1967. A model for shared decision making in the school principalship . Educational Administration Quarterly 3:49-61.

Boomsma, A. 1987. The robustness of maximum likelihood estimation in structural equation models. In Structural modeling by example , edited by P. Cuttance and R. Ecob ,160-88. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Conley, S.C. 1991. Review of research on teacher participation in school decision making. Review of Research in Education 17:225-66.

Conley, S.C. , T. Schmidle , and J.B. Shedd. 1988. Teacher participation in the management of school systems. Teachers College Record 90:259-80.

Cousins, J.B. , and L.M. Earl. 1982. The case for participatory evaluation . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14:397-418.

Duke, D.L. , B.K. Showers , and M. Imber. 1981. Studying shared decision making in schools . In Organizational behavior in schools and school districts , edited by S. B. Bacharach , 313-51. New York: Praeger.

Estler, S.E. 1988. Decision making. In Handbook of research on educational administration, edited by N. Boyan , 305-20. New York: Longman .

10.

Firestone, W.A. 1977. Participation and influence in the planning of educational change. Journal of Applied and Behavioral Science 13:167-87.

11.

Greene, J.C. 1988a. Communication of results and utilization in participatory program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning 11:341-51.

12.

—. 1988b. Stakeholder participation and utilization in program evaluation. Evaluation Review 2:91-116.

13.

Hawaii Department of Education. 1989. Special needs schools: Administrators' handbook. Honolulu : Hawaii Department of Education.

14.

Hart, A.W. 1990. Impacts of the school social unit on teacher authority during work redesign. American Educational Reseanch Journal 27:503-32.

15.

Heck, R.H. 1992. Principals' instructional leadership and school achievement: Implications for policy development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14:21-34.

16.

House, E.R. 1980. Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

17.

—. 1991. Evaluation and social justice: Where are we? In Evaluation and education: At quarter century. Ninetieth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part II, edited by M. W. McLaughlin and D. C. Phillips , 233-47. Chicago : National Society for the Study of Education.

18.

—. 1993. Professional evaluaicon. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

19.

Hull, R.H. 1991. Organizations Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

20.

Jöreskog, K.G. , and D. Sorbom. 1989. LISREL VII user's guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.

21.

Malen, B. , R.T. Ogawa , and J. Kranz. 1990. What do we know about school-based management? A case study of the literature—A call for research. In Choice and control in American education, vol. 2, edited by W. H. Clune and J. F. Witte , 289-342. Bristol, PA: Falmar.

22.

McTaggart, R. 1991. When democratic evaluation doesn't seem democratic. Evaluation Practice 12:9-21.

23.

Smylie, M.A. 1992. Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14:53-67.

24.

Wheaton, B. , B. Muthen, D. Alwin , and G. Summers. 1977. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In Sociological methodology, edited D. R. Heise , 84-136. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

25.

White, P. 1992. Teacher empowerment under "ideal" school-site autonomy . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14:69-82.

Teacher Involvement in School-Conducted Needs Assessments

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References