Analysis of several data sets suggests that when "don't know" is used as an option in an
evaluation of others, the number of omitted items may correlate negatively with the summated
evaluation. When present, this variation of social desirability or nonrandom tendency toward
item nonresponse has the potential to bias results. Measures are suggested to both detect and
control for this tendency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, A.B., A. Basilevsky, and P.J. Hum.1983. Missing data. In Handbook of survey research, edited by P. H. Rossi , J. D. Wright, and A. B. Anderson, 415-94. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Bell, R.1984. Item nonresponse in telephone surveys: An analysis of who fails to report income. Social Science Quarterly65(1): 207-15.
3.
Colsher, P.L., and R.B. Wallace.1989. Data quality and age: Health and psychobehavioral correlates of item nonresponse and inconsistent responses. Journal of Gerontology44(2): 45-52.
4.
Converse, J.M., and S. Presser.1986. Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
Dickinson, J.R., and E. Kirzner.1985. Questionnaire item omission as a function of within-group position. Journal of Business Research13(1): 71-75.
6.
Didow, N.M., W.D. Perreault, and N.C. Williamson .1983. A cross-sectional optimal scaling analysis of the Index of Consumer Sentiment. Journal of Consumer Research10:339-47.
7.
Durand, R.M., H.J. Guffey, and J.M. Planchon.1983. An examination of the random versus nonrandom nature of item omissions. Journal of Marketing Research20:305-13.
8.
Hermann, D., and F. Streng.1986. Das Dunkenfeld der Befragung; Unit-nonresponse und item-nonresponse bei einer schriftlichen Befragung von Richtern und Staatsanwalten [The uncertain field of interviewing: Unit-nonresponse and item-nonresponse in a written questionnaire of judges and prosecutors]. Kolner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie38(2): 337-51.
9.
Johanson, G.A., and C.J. Gips.1989. Secondary school hiring practices: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, Massachusetts.
10.
Johanson, G.A., C.J. Gips, and C.E. Rich.1992. "If you can't say something nice": Alternatives for dealing with survey item nonresponse. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association , San Francisco, California.
11.
Kalton, G.1983. Compensating for missing survey data. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
12.
Little, R.J.A., and D.B. Rubin.1987. Statistical analysis with missing data . New York: Wiley.
13.
Martin, R.1989. The lead teacher project: K-6 mathematics and science elementary teacher enhancement. NSF grant number 91-47392.
14.
Omura, G.S.1983. Correlates of item nonresponse. Journal of the Market Research Society25(4): 321-30.
15.
Poe, G.S., I. Seeman, J. McLaughlin, E. Mehl, and M. Dieth.1988. "Don't know" boxes in factual questions in a mail questionnaire: Effects on level and quality of response. Public Opinion Quarterly52:212-22.
16.
Singer, E., M.R. Frankel, R. Martin, and M.B. Glassman.1983. The effect of interviewer characteristics and expectations on response. Public Opinion Quarterly47(1): 68-83.
17.
Stumpf, S.A.1978. A note on handling missing data. Journal of Management4(1): 65-73.
18.
Sudman, S., and N.M. Bradburn.1974. Response effects in surveys. Chicago: Aldine.
19.
Ying, Y.1989. Nonresponse on the center for epidemiological studies-depression scale in Chinese Americans. International Journal of Social Psychiatry35(2): 156-63.
