Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Butler, K.
1984 . Reapportionment, the courts, and the voting rights act . University of Colorado Law Review
56 :1 -97 .
2.
Clark, W.
, and
P. Morrison.
1991 . Demographic paradoxes in the Los Angeles voting rights case . Evaluation Review
15 :712 -26 .
3.
Daily Appellate Report. 1990. Yolanda Garza et al. v. County of Los Angeles et al. 90 Daily Journal DAR 6141.
4.
Grofman, B.
1987 . Models of voting . Research in Micropolitics
2 :31 -61 .
5.
—. 1991 . Statistics without substance: Acritique of Freedman et al. and Clark and Morrison . Evaluation Review
15 :746 -69 .
6.
Irwin, L.
, and
A. Lichtman.
1976 . Across the great divide: Inferring individual level behavior from aggregate data . Political Methodology
3 :411 -39 .
7.
Klein, S.
,
J. Sacks
, and
D. Freedman.
1991 . Ecological regression versus the secret ballot . Jurimetrics
31 :393 -413 .
8.
Langbein, L.
, and
A. Lichtman.
1978 . Ecological inference . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
9.
Lichtman, A.
1974 . Correlation, regression and the ecological fallacy: A critique . Interdisciplinary History
4 :417 -33 .
10.
—. 1991 . Passing the test: Ecological regression analysis in the Los Angeles County case and beyond . Evaluation Review
15 :770 -99 .
11.
Loewen, J.
, and
B. Grofman.
1989 . Recent developments in methods used in vote dilution litigation . Urban Lawyer
21 :589 -604 .