Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

At the center of the JOBS program of the Family Support Act is the placement of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients into work-related activities. Massachusetts' Em ployment and Training (ET) Choices Program, which predates JOBS, is a work incentive (WIN) demonstration based on the premise that AFDC recipients will choose work over welfare if presented with genuine opportunities for economic improvement. In this study, models of the Massachusetts AFDC-Basic caseload are developed to estimate what the caseload would have been in the absence of the ET Choices Program. The results indicate that ET Choices successfully reduced the basic caseload over its first 18 months of operation, but had little effect during the second half of the 3-year evaluation period.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnow, Burt S. 1988. Estimating the New Jersey AFDC caseload Contract No. HHS-100-86-0051. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

Ellwood, David T. 1986. Targeting would-be long-term recipients of AFDC Contract No. HHS-100-84-0059. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

Friedlander, Daniel , Gregory Hoerz , Janet Quint , and James Riccio. 1985. Arkansas: Final report on the WORK program in two counties New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.

Hamilton, Gayle. 1988. Interim report on the saturation work initiative model in San Diego New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.

Massachusetts Department of Public Welfare. 1989. Employment and training choices: A fact sheet Boston: Massachusetts Department of Public Welfare .

Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation. 1987. Training people to live without welfare Boston : Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation.

Mathematica Policy Research Incorporated. 1985. Technical report for the AFDC forecasting project Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, Office of Family Assistance .

Nightingale, Demetra , D. Lee Bawden , and Lynn Burbridge. 1987. Summary of Massachusetts ET Choices Evaluation Design Paper presented at the meetings for the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Bethesda, MD, October.

Plotnick, Robert D. , and Russell M. Lidman . 1987. Forecasting welfare caseloads: A tool to improve budgeting Public Budgeting & Finance Autumn: 70-81.

10.

U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. 1988. Background material and data on programs within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means, 1988 edition Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives .

11.

Webb, Randall , Anne Bergsman , Clara Hager , Douglas Murray , and Eric Simon. 1986. TRIM2 reference manual: The framework for microsimulation Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Analyzing the Effect of Massachusetts' ET Choices Program on the State's Afdc-Basic Caseload

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References