This article describes an evaluation of the implementation of a community diversion program for nonviolent offenders in Virginia. The evaluation used a unique application of logit analysis to focus on the extent to which the program was serving the intended population, in this case, offenders who would have otherwise been incarcerated. Results indicate that at least 46% of the divertees would have been incarcerated if the program had not been available. Usefulness of a statistical technique for evaluating implementation and providing concrete results to policymakers is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abt Associates (1981) American Prisons and Jails. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice
2.
AustinJ. A.KrisbergB. (1982) “The unmet promise of alternatives to incarceration.”Crime & Delinquency26: 374–409
3.
BlumsteinA.CohenJ.MartinS.TonryM. (1983) Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
4.
GalawayB. (1977) “Restitution as an integrative punishment,” pp. 331–347 in BarnettR.HagelJ. (eds.) Assessing the Criminal: Restitution, Retribution, and the Legal Process. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger
5.
GarberS.KlepperS.NaginD. (1983) “The role of extralegal factors in determining criminal case disposition,” pp. 129–183 in BlumsteinA. (eds.) Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
6.
HaynesP.LarsenC. R. (1984) “Financial consequences of incarceration and alternatives: Burglary.”Crime & Delinquency30: 529–550
7.
HyltonJ. H. (1982) “Rhetoric and reality: a critical appraisal of community correctional programs.”Crime & Delinquency26: 341–373
8.
KressJ. M. (1980) Prescription for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger
9.
MillerD. (1980) “Alternatives to incarceration: from total institutions to total systems.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
10.
SchoenK. F. (1978) “The Community Corrections Act.”Crime & Delinquency22: 461
11.
SheppardB. (1980) “Some definitions of diversion.”Home Office Research Bull. 9: 10
12.
SudmanS. (1976) Applied Sampling. New York: Academic Press