This article first reviews the sections of the National Energy Act as it applies to electricity
rate innovations. It then focuses on one particular rate structure ("lifeline" rates) and
identifies three research designs commonly used to evaluate its effects. Finally, it discusses
the analytic and interpretive assumptions inherent in these studies and suggests how these
assumptions will have to be altered before social scientists can contribute effectively to
policy research in this area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achen, C. (1982) Interpreting and Using Regression. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Acton, J., B. Mitchell, and R. Sohlberg (1980) "Estimating residential electricity demand under declining block tariffs; an econometric study using micro-data." Applied Economics12: 145-161.
3.
Austin, T. and J. Stutz (1983) "Embedded cost of service studies issues in the wake of PURPA." Public Utilities Fortnightly November 10.
4.
Berg, S. (1981) "PURPA and benefit-cost analysis for innovative rates." Public Utilities Fortnightly October 8.
5.
———and J. Herden (1976) "Electricity price structures: efficiency, equity, and the composition of demand." Land Economics52, 2: 169-178.
6.
Berk, R., C. Lacivita, K. Sredl, and T. Cooley (1981) Water Shortage. Cam-bridge, MA: Abt Books.
7.
Berman, M., M. Hammer, and D. Tihansky (1972) The Impact of Electricity Price Increases on Income Groups: Western United States and Canada. # R-1050-NSF. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
8.
Burgess, G. and M. Paglin (1981) "Lifeline electricity rates as an income transfer device." Land Economics57, 1: 41-47.
9.
Canan, P. and M. Hennessy (1981) "In defense of lifeline rates: an empirical analysis ." Public Utilities Fortnightly October 5.
10.
Cook, T. and D. Campbell (1979) Quasi-Experimentation. Chicago : Rand McNally.
11.
Crawford, W. (1978) "An electric utility perspective on rate design revision." Public Utilities Fortnightly September 14.
12.
Cronbach, L. (1982) Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
13.
Cullen, B., J. Johnson, and I. Sommers (1983) "Implications of electric utility rate legislation for low income households in Oakland and Livingston counties, Michigan" Social Sci. J.20, 2: 87-91.
14.
Dahl, A. (1978) "California's lifeline policy." Public Utilities Fortnightly August 31.
15.
Decision Research Corporation (1980) A Survey of Households m APCO and VEPCO Utility Regions in the State of Virginia . Lexington, MA.
16.
Denver Research Institute (1982) A Lifeline Rate Structure for Electricity in Colorado: An Analysis of Issues and Approaches. Colorado: University of Denver.
17.
Dickson, P., R. Lusch, and W. Wilkie (1983) "Consumer acquisition priorities for home appliances: a replication and re-evaluation." J. of Consumer Research9: 432-435.
18.
Dimopoulos, D. (1981) "Pricing schemes for regulated enterprises and their welfare implications in the case of electricity." Bell J.12, 1: 185-200.
19.
Duncan, O. (1975) Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic Press.
20.
Electrical World (1976) "Lifeline rates get a failing grade." Electrical World August 15.
21.
Ferber, R. and W. Hirsch (1978) "Social experimentation and economic policy: a survey." J. of Economic LiteratureXVI4: 1179-1414.
22.
Frank, R. (1977) "Lifeline proposals and economic efficiency requirements ." Public Utilities Fortnightly May 26.
23.
Garbacz, C. (1982) "Lifeline electricity rates as an income transfer device: comment." Land Economics58, 2: 228-234.
24.
Grandjean, B. and P. Taylor (1979) "Public policy and renter's electric bills." Social Sci. Q.60, 3: 437-444.
25.
Hanushek, E. and J. Jackson (1977) Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.
26.
House, E. (1980) Evaluating With Validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Howe, J. (1976) "Lifeline rates: benefits for whom?" Public Utilities Fortnightly January 29.
28.
Jefferson, W. (1976) "New developments in utility rate design." Electric Perspectives June: 16-21.
29.
Journey, D. (1981) "PURPA rate studies: much ado about technical analysis " Public Utilities Fortnightly July.
30.
MacCormac, E. (1982) "Lifeline: equitable or inequitable?" Environmental Rev.4, 14: 46-51.
31.
McCloskey, D. (1983) "The rhetoric of economics." J. of Economic Literature21: 482-517.
32.
McGrath, J. (1982) "Dilemmatics," in McGrath et al. Judgment Calls in Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
33.
Nissel, H. (1979) "Federal rate design standards and energy conservation ." Public Utilities Fortnightly May 24.
34.
Olsen, E. and W. Leininger (1980) "Evaluating PURPA rate design standards." Public Utilities Fortnightly September 11.
35.
Parhizgari, A. and P. Davis (1978) "The residential demand for electricity: a variant parameters approach." Applied Economics10: 331-340.
36.
Petersen, H. (1982) "Gainers and losers with lifeline electricity rates ." Public Utilities Fortnightly November 25.
37.
Robinson, F. (1983) "The regulator's mission: the most good or the least harm?" Public Utilities Fortnightly May 26.
38.
Roll, J. and E. Lande (1980) "Lifeline rates: impact and significance." Public Utilities Fortnightly July 31.
39.
Roth, W. (1976) "Micro-data measurement of residential rate restructuring ." Public Utilities Fortnightly January 16.
40.
Sechrest, L. and W. Yeaton (1982) "Magnitude of experimental effects in social science research." Evaluation Rev.6, 5.
41.
Stevens, R. (1981) "Spurnng economic development through innovative rate structures." Electric Perspectives (Fall): 1-5.
42.
Taylor, L. (1975) "The demand for electricity: a survey." Bell J.6, 1: 74-110.
43.
Temple, Barker, AND SLOAN, INC. (1980) An Evaluation of Lifeline Electricity Rates. Lexington, MA.
44.
Webb, E., O. Campbell, R. Schwartz, L. Sechrest, and J. Grove (1981). Nonreactive Measure in the Social Sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
45.
Wilson, J. and R. Uhler (1976) "Inverted electric utilities rate structures: an empirical analysis," in H. Trebing (ed.) New Dimensions in Public Utility Pricing. Lansing: Michigan State University, Graduate School of Business Administration.