Federal evaluations in education contributed in numerous and important ways to changes
in law, regulation, and management. Information about implementation contributed
most often, but information about outcomes, cost, and federal administration also made
contributions. The findings of the present study are surprising in light ofprevious research
that concluded evaluations do not often contribute to decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bauman, P. (1976) "The formulation and evolution of the health maintenance organization policy, 1970-1973." Social Sci. and Medicine10 (March/April): 129-142.
2.
Boruch, R. F. and D. S. Cordray [eds.] (1980) An Appraisal Educational Program Evaluations: Federal, State and Local Agencies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (ED 192 446).
3.
Caplan, N., A. Morrison, and R. Stambaugh (1975) The Use of Social Science Knowledge in Policy Decisions at the National Level. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
4.
Cohen, D.K. and M.S. Garet (1975) "Reforming educational policy with applied social research." Harvard Educ. Rev.45 (February): 17-41.
5.
Cook, T.D. and W.E. Pollard (1977) "Guidelines: How to recognize and avoid some common problems of mis-utilization of evaluation findings." Evaluation4: 161-164.
6.
Cronbach, L., S.R. Ambron, S.M. Dornbusch, R.D. Hess, R.C. Hornik, D.C. Philips, D.F. Walker, and S.S. Weiner (1980) Toward Reform of Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Danielson, M.N., Hershey, and Banes (1977) One Nation, So Many Governments: A Ford Foundation Report. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
8.
Downs, A. (1967) Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
9.
Dunn, W.N., I.I. Mitroff and S.J. Deutsch (1981) "The obsolescence of evaluation research." Evaluation and Program Planning4, 3/4: 207-218.
10.
Florio, D.,M.M. Behrman, and D.L. Goltz (1979) "What do policymakers think of educational evaluation?—Or do they?" Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis1: 61-88.
11.
Fox. H.W. (1977) "Evaluation research and Congressional oversight: A case study of a general phenomenon." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science , Denver, CO, February.
12.
Guba, E.G. and Y.S. Lincoln (1981) Effective Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Hill, P. (1980) "Evaluating education programs for federal policy makers: Lessons from the NIE Compensatory Education Study," in J. Pincus et al., Educational Evaluation in the Public Policy Setting. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp. (R-2502-RC).
14.
Knorr, K.D. (1977) "Policymakers' use of social science knowledge: Symbolic or instrumental?" in C. H. Weiss (ed.) Using Social Science Research in Public Policy Making . Lexington, MA: Lexington Books .
15.
Leviton, L.C. and R.F. Boruch (1982) "Usefulness of evaluations: The NIE Compensatory Education Study." In press, J. of Policy Analysis and Management .
16.
Leviton, L.C. and R.F. Boruch (1980) "Illustrative case studies," in R. F. Boruch and D. S. Cordray (eds.) An Appraisal of Educational Program Evaluations: Federal, State, and Local Levels. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (ED 192 446).
17.
Leviton, L.C. and E.F.X. Hughes (1981) "A review and synthesis of research on the utilization of evaluations." Evaluation Review5 (August): 525-548.
18.
Lindblom, C.E. (1968) The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
19.
Menges, C.C. (1978) Knowledge and Action: The Use of Social Science Evaluation in Decisions on Equal Educational Opportunity, 1970-1973. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
20.
Millsap, M.A. (1978) "The uses of evaluation in federal regulation writing: A case study." Presented at Evaluation Research Society Convention, Washington, DC.
21.
Mitchell, D.E. (1980) "Social science impact on legislative decisionmaking. Process and substance." Presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Convention, Boston , April.
22.
Nathan, R.P. (1979) "Federal grants-in-aid: How are they working in 1978? Presented for Conference on "The city in stress." Sponsored by the Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers Univ. March 9.
23.
Patton, M.Q., P.S. Grimes, K.M. Guthrie, N.J. Brennan, B.D. French, and D.A. Blyth (1977) "In search of impact: An analysis of the utilization of federal health evaluation research," in C. H. Weiss (ed.) Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
24.
Pelz, D.C. (1978) "Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy," in J. M. Yinger and S. J. Cutler (eds.) Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View. New York: Macmillan.
25.
Pressman, J.L. and A. Wildavsky (1973) Implementation. Berkeley, CA : Univ. of California Press.
26.
Rich, R.F. (1979) "Problem-solving and evaluation research: Unemployment Insurance policy," in R. F. Rich (ed.) Translating Evaluation into Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Rich, R.F. (1977) "Uses of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action versus knowledge for understanding," in C. H. Weiss (ed.) Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
28.
Rivlin, A. M. and P. M. Timpane [eds.] (1975) Planned Variation in Education . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
29.
Saxe, L. and D. Koretz (1982) "Editors' notes." Making Evaluation Research Useful to Congress. New Directions for Program Evaluation1982 (June): 1-8.
30.
Suchman, E.A. (1967) Evaluative Research. New York : Russell Sage.
31.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1975) Follow Through: Lessons Learned from Its Evaluation and the Need to Improve Its Administration. (MWD-75-34). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office, October 7.
32.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Education and Labor (1979) Education Amendments of 1980 (96th Congress, 1st Session, Report No. 96-520. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office.
33.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Education and Labor (1978) Report: The Education Amendments of 1978, H.R. 15. (95th Congress, Second Session, Report No. 95-1137. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, May 11.
34.
U.S. Office of Education, Office of Evaluation and Dissemination (1980) Annual Evaluation Report, Fiscal Year 1979.
35.
U.S. Office of Education, Office of Evaluation and Dissemination (1979) Annual Evaluation Report, Fiscal Year 1978.
36.
U.S. Senate, Committee on Appropriations ( 1979) Report on the Departments of Labor and Health, Education and Welfare, and Related Agencies Appropriation Bill, 1980. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
37.
Weiss, C.H. (1981) "Measuring the use of evaluation," in J. A. Ciarlo (ed.) Utilizing Evaluation: Concepts and Measurement Techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
Weiss, C.H. (1978) "Improving the linkage between social research and public policy," in L. E. Lynn (ed.) Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
39.
Weiss, C.H. (1977) "Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social research." Policy Analysis3 (Fall): 531-545.
Weiss, C.H. and M.J. Bucuvalas (1977) "The challenge of social research to decision-making ," in C. H. Weiss (ed.) Using Social Science Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
42.
Weiss, J.A. and C.H. Weiss (1981) "Social scientists and decision makers look at the usefulness of mental health research." American Psychologist36 (August): 837-847.
43.
Zweig, F.M. (1979) "The evaluation worldview of Congressional staff ,"in F. M. Zweig (ed.) Evaluation in Legislation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
