Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

With the continuous advancement of digital technology, traditional manufacturing and service industries are facing dynamic changes with diversified demand and business models. Digital transformation (DT) and dynamic business modeling have become increasingly necessary for companies to evaluate and prioritize better opportunities to improve strategic planning and productivity. This study demonstrates that the system dynamics modeling process, based on the principles of sustainable system development, can fully reflect the comprehensiveness of systems thinking and avoid the drawbacks of linear thinking failing to integrate various departments. The proposed model enables the comprehensive integration of technology, production, marketing, management, and capital, thereby identifying and testing opportunities for successful DT with minimal costs and budgetary constraints. A real-world case study demonstrates the value of simulation-based dynamic business modeling with scientific data analysis for evaluating DT strategies.

Keywords

digital transformation strategy system dynamics systems thinking sustainable system development dynamic business modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acemoglu

Autor

Hazell

Restrepo

(2022). Artificial intelligence and jobs: Evidence from online vacancies. Journal of Labor Economics, 40(S1), S293–S340. https://doi.org/10.1086/718327

Alshenqeeti

(2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English Linguistics Research, 3(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v3n1p39

Brynjolfsson

Jin

McElheran

(2021). The power of prediction: Predictive analytics, workplace complements, and business performance. Business Economics, 56(4), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-021-00224-5

Chun

Kim

J.-W.

Morck

Yeung

(2008). Creative destruction and firm-specific performance heterogeneity. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.06.005

Commander

Harrison

Menezes-Filho

(2011). ICT and productivity in developing countries: New firm-level evidence from Brazil and India. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00080

Correani

De Massis

Frattini

Petruzzelli

A. M.

Natalicchio

(2020). Implementing a digital strategy: Learning from the experience of three digital transformation projects. California Management Review, 62(4), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620934864

Creswell

J. W.

Clark

V. L. P.

(2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

DeStefano

Kneller

Timmis

(2018). Broadband infrastructure, ICT use and firm performance: Evidence for UK firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 155(4), 110–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.08.020

Eisenhardt

K. M.

(1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557

10.

Forrester

J. W.

(1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10(2-3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100211

11.

Goldmann

H. M.

(1980). How to win customers (revised edition). Macmillan Education.

12.

Gurbaxani

Dunkle

(2019). Gearing up for successful digital transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00017

13.

Haddud

Khare

(2020). Digitalizing supply chains: Potential benefits and impact on lean operations. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(4), 731–765. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-03-2019-0026

14.

Leech

N. L.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

(2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality and Quantity, 43(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

15.

Müller

Fay

Vom Brocke

(2018). The effect of big data and analytics on firm performance: An econometric analysis considering industry characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(2), 488–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1451955

16.

Rashid

Warraich

M. A.

Sabir

S. S.

Waseem

(2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18(1), Article 160940691986242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424

17.

Senge

P. M.

Sterman

J. D.

(1992). Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90011-w

18.

Sterman

J. D.

(2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill Education.

19.

Wei

Wang

Liu

(2023). The impact of digital transformation on the total factor productivity of heavily polluting enterprises. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33553-w

20.

Venkatesh

Brown

S. A.

Sullivan

Y. W.

(2016). Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(7), 435–494. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00433

21.

Verhoef

P. C.

Broekhuizen

Bart

Bhattacharya

Dong

J. Q.

Fabian

Haenlein

(2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122(1), 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

22.

Vial

(2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

23.

Warner

K. S. R.

Wäger

(2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001

24.

Warren

(2010). Strategy dynamics essentials. Strategy Dynamics Ltd.

25.

Weiss

R. S.

(1995). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Simon & Schuster.

26.

Yan

M. R.

(2022). Transforming manufacturing: Case studies in selected AOP member countries. Methodology and framework of analysis. Asian Productivity Organization.

27.

Yan

M.-R.

Chien

K.-M.

Hong

L.-Y.

Yang

T.-N.

(2018). Evaluating the collaborative ecosystem for an innovation-driven economy: A systems analysis and case study of science parks. Sustainability (Basel), 10(3), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030887

28.

Yan

M.-R.

Yan

H. Y.

Chen

Y. R.

Zhang

Yan

Zhao

(2025). Integrated green supply chain system development with digital transformation. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2025.2492217

29.

Yang

Wei

Zhou

Chen

(2025). The global industrial robot trade network: Evolution and China’s rising international competitiveness. Systems, 13(5), 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050361

30.

Yang

T.-K.

Yan

M.-R.

(2019). Exploring the enablers of strategic orientation for technology-driven business innovation ecosystems. Sustainability (Basel), 11(20), 5779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205779

31.

Yin

R. K.

(1999). Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Services Research, 34(Pt 2), 1209–1224.

32.

Yin

R. K.

(2015). Case studies. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral science (pp. 194–201). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.10507-0

Evaluation of Digital Transformation Strategies Through Dynamic Business Modeling and Scenario Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References