BEPS Project and International Tax Reform: The 2021 Agreements on Taxing Multinational Companies

Abstract

The globalization of commercial exchanges and capital movements reveal new ways of obtaining value in economic activities, and the differences in the tax burden of companies, depending on where they reside, have become threats for countries to exercise the right to tax business profits generated in its jurisdiction. This problem, together with tax competition between countries, causes a transfer of tax bases towards countries with lower tax rates and tax havens. The lack of agreement in the international community on how to find a solution to the problems has caused several countries to choose to establish special taxes for certain activities of multinational companies in their jurisdictions, resulting in inefficient taxes. This paper analyzes the agreement reached in October 2021 in the G20 and in the OECD in which measures are adopted within the BEPS project to prevent the erosion of tax bases in market jurisdictions promoted by multinational companies. After studying different aspects, we found fundamental reasons for not having an optimistic view on the effective solution to the problems above: unrealistic forecasts on the amount of the new estimated tax bases for Pillar 1 and the high administration and compliance costs. In conclusion, it is not foreseeable that the tax bases derived from the provision of digital services will suffer a territorial redistribution. We do not expect that a minimum tax rate of 15% in corporate tax will be carried out effectively or that the benefits that are transferred to tax havens will be significantly reduced.

Keywords

digital economy BEPS project corporate tax multinational companies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ali

S. M.

Klemm

(2013). A Partial Race to the Bottom: Corporate Tax Developments in Emerging and Developing Economies. International Tax and Public Finance, 20(4), 596–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-013-9286-8

Allevato

(2018). The Commission’s State Aid Decisions on Advance Tax Rulings: Criticisms and Potential Impact on the Future of Direct Taxation Within the European Union. In Combating Tax Avoidance in the European Union: Harmonization and Cooperation in Direct Taxation, edited by Almudi

J. M.

Ferreras Gutiérrez

J. A.

Hernández González-Barreda

, Vol. 2. Wolters KluwerLegal Business World. https://www.legalbusinessworld.com/single-post/2019/04/04/Multinational-enterprisesand-design-of-a-tax-aligned-global-supply-chain. — (2019). Multinational enterprises and design of a tax-aligned global supply chain.

Allevato

De Vito

(2021). Gravar La Economía Digital: ¿es un Impuesto Sobre Los Servicios Digitales La Solución Adecuada? Cuadernos de Información Económica (FUNCAS), 280, 23–32.

Altshuler

Goodspeed

T. J.

(2015). Follow the Leader? Evidence on European and US Tax Competition. Public Finance Review, 43(4), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142114527781

Álvarez-Martínez

M. T

Barrios

D’Andria

Gesualdo

Pontikakis

Pycroft

(2018). The economic consequences of corporate tax rates reductions in the EU: Evidence using a computable general equilibrium model. The World Economy, 42(3), 818–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12703

Antràs

(2021). De-globalisation? Global value chains in the post-COVID-19 age. 2021 ECB Forum: “Central Banks in a Shifting World.” Conference Proceedings, March 26, 2021.

Asen

(2020). What European OECD Countries are Doing About Digital Services Taxes? https://taxfoundation.org/digital-tax-europe-2020/(14 de octubre de 2020

Bethmann

Jacob

Müller

M. A.

(2018). Tax Loss Carrybacks: Investment Stimulus Versus Misallocation. The Accounting Review, 93(4), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51956

Cobham

Faccio

FitzGerald

(2019). Global Inequalities in Taxing Rights: An Early Evaluation of the OECD Tax Reform Proposals. New York, NY: Mimeo. https://pop-umbrella.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/8087f93a-32a7-4512-85b9-9afa3306e255_Globalinequalitiesintaxingrights-CobhamFaccioFitzGeraldOct19PRELIMINARY.pdf

10.

Cobham

Faccio

García-Bernardo

Janský

Kadet

Picciotto

(2021). A practical proposal to end corporate tax abuse: METR, a minimum effective tax rate for multinationals. Global Policy, 13(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13029

11.

Collin

(2013). Task Force on Taxation of the Digital Economy. Disponible en: https://www.hldataprotection.com/files/2013/06/Taxation_Digital_Economy.pdf

12.

Cooper

(1986). Financial Innovations: New Markets Instruments. Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

13.

Cooper

Nguyen

Q. T.

(2020). Multinational enterprises and corporate tax planning: A review of literature and suggestions for a future research agenda. International Business Review, 29(3), 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101692

14.

Cullen

J. B.

Gordon

R. H.

(2007). Taxes and entrepreneurial risk-taking: Theory and evidence. US Journal of Public Economics, 9(7), 1479–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.12.001

15.

Dahlby

(2011). Global Value Chains, Foreign Direct Investment, and Taxation. In Sydor

(Ed.), Global Value Chains - Impacts and Implications. Trade Policy Research 2011. Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada.

16.

De Simone

Klassen

Seidman

J. K.

(2017). Unprofitable affiliates and income shifting behaviour. The Accounting Review, 92(3), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51555

17.

Devereux

M. P.

(2021). Los Impuestos y La Digitalización: La Reforma Fiscal Internacional de 2021. IEB Report 3/2021.

18.

Devereux

M. P.

Bares

Clifford

Freedman

Güçeri

McCarthy

Simmler

Vella

(2020). The OECD Global Anti-Base Erosion Proposal. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.

19.

Devereux

M. P.

Fuest

Lockwood

(2015). The taxation of foreign profits: A unified view. Journal of Public Economics, 125, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.005

20.

Devereux

M. P.

Vella

(2017). Implications of Digitalization for International Corporate Tax Reform. In Gupta

Keen

Shah

Verdier

(Eds.), Digital Revolutions in Public Finance, (91–112). FMI.

21.

de Wilde

Maarten

. (2022). Why Pillar Two Top-Up Taxation Requires Tax Treaty Modification. Kluwer International Tax Blog. http://kluwertaxblog.com/2022/01/12/why-pillar-two-top-up-taxation-requires-tax-treaty-modification/

22.

Di Tanno

Marchetti

(Eds.) (2019). La tassazione dell’economia digitale. In http://www.fondazionebrunovisentini.eu/

23.

Dyreng

S. D.

Hanlon

Maydew

E. L.

(2019). When Does Tax Avoidance Result in Tax Uncertainty? American Accounting Association, 94(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52198

24.

Escribano

. (2018). A Preliminary Assessment of the EU Proposal on Significant Digital Presence: A Brave Attempt That Requires and Deserves Further Analysis. In Almudí

J. M.

Ferreras Gutiérrez

J. A.

Hernández

. Combating Tax Avoidance in the EU Harmonization and Cooperation in Direct Taxation, pp. (559–600).

25.

European Commission . (2018a). Proposal for a Council Directive on the common system of a digital services tax on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services, 148 final 2018/0073 (CNS). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018PC0148&from=ES pp. 148.

26.

European Commission . (2018b). Proposal for a Council Directive laying down rules relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence, COM(2018) 147 final 2018/0072 (CNS), March 2018. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:3d33c84c-327b-11e8-b5fe-01aa75ed71a1.0017.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

27.

Felix

R. A.

Hines

J. R.

(2009). Corporate Taxes and Union Wages in the United States. NBER. Working paper No 15263.

28.

Fitz Gerald

Dayle

(2018). The Effects of International Tax Competition on National Income Distribution. In José

(Ed.) International Policy Rules and Inequality. Columbia University Press. ISBN: 9780231549141.

29.

Freedman

(2018). Restoring Trust in the ‘Fairness’ of Corporate Taxation: Increased Transparency and the Need for Institutional Reform. Goslinga

From S.

, et al. (Eds.). Tax and Trust Institutions, Interactions and Instruments. Eleven International Publishing. Reproduced here with the kind permission of the publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3396775

30.

Fuest

Parenti

Toubal

(2019). International Corporate taxation: What Reforms? What Impact? Les Notes Du Conseil d’Analyse Economique, 54(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3917/ncae.054.0001

31.

Fuest

Peichl

Siegloch

(2017). Do higher corporate taxes reduce wages? Micro Evidence from Germany. American Economic Review, 108(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130570

32.

Fuest

Peichl

Siegloch

(2018). Do higher corporate taxes reduce wages? Micro Evidence from Germany. American Economic Review, 108(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130570

33.

Fullerton

Metcalf

G. E.

(2002). Tax incidence. In Handbook of Public Economics (4, pp. 1787–1872). Elsevier.

34.

Giles

Abboud

Agyemang

(2021). Global Tax Deal Backers Battle to Win Over Holdout Countries, 29. Financial Times.

35.

González

Mascareñas

(1999). La Globalización De Los Mercados Financieros. Noticias de la Unión Europea, 172: 15–35.

36.

Harberger

A. C.

(1962). The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax. Journal of Political, 70(3), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1086/258636

37.

Heckemeyer

Nicolay

Spengel

(2021). What Will the OECD BEPS Indicators Indicate? ZEW - Center for European Economic Research. SSRN. Discussion Paper No. 21-005, Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3783644 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn. 3783644

38.

Huebscher

Sattler

Wagner

(2021). Does Austerity Cause Polarization? SSRN. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3541546 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3541546

39.

Kennedy

J. F.

(1961). Special Message to the Congress on Taxation. http://millercenter.org

40.

Klausing

Saez

Zucman

(2021). Ending Corporate Tax avoidance and Tax Competition: A Plan to Collect the Tax Deficit of Multinationals. UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research. Paper No. 20-12 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3655850

41.

Kofler

G. W.

Mayr

Schlager

(2017). Taxation of the Digital Economy: “Quick Fixes” or Long-Term Solution? European Taxation, 57, 523–532.

42.

Krugman

(2018). Wat's the Matter With Europe? New York, NY: New York Times.

43.

Liberini

Lassmann

Russo

(2021). Los Efectos De Los Impuestos “Google” Sobre Servicios Digitales Sobre Las Plataformas Digitales Multinacionales. IEB Report, 2021: 27–30.

44.

López Laborda

Onrubia

(2020). Retos A Los Que se Enfrenta La Fiscalidad De Las Multinacionales: Las Propuestas De La OCDE. Información Comercial Española (ICE), 917, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.32796/ice.2020.917.7136

45.

McCoy

Rahman

Somer

(2018). Polarisation and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576

46.

McKenzie

Ferede

(2017). The Incidence of the Corporate Income Tax on Wages: Evidence from Canadian Provinces. SPP Technical Paper University. The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, 10(7).

47.

Miller

(1986). Financial Innovation: The Last Twenty Years and the Next. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21(4), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330693

48.

Naitram

S. M.

Weinzierl

M. C.

(2021). The Incidence of the Corporate Income Tax is Irrelevant for Its (Benefit-Based) Justification. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 29547.

49.

Naughton

(2007). The Chinese Economy. Transitions and Growth. Cambridge, MA:

The MIT Press.

50.

Navarro Ibarrola

(2021). Consideraciones De Política Fiscal Sobre La Propuesta GLOBE De Tributación Mínima PILAR 2. Crónica Tributaria, 179, 63–91. https://doi.org/10.47092/ct.21.2.3

51.

OECD . (2013a). BEPS Action Plan. OECD Publishing.

52.

OECD . (2013b). Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. OECD Publishing.

53.

OECD . (2015a). Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project: 2015 Final Reports, Executive Summaries. OECD Publishing.

54.

OECD . (2015b). Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, action 1-2015 Final Report. OECD Publishing.

55.

OECD . (2016). Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/multilateral-convention-to-implement-tax-treaty-related-measures-to-prevent-BEPS.pdf

56.

OECD . (2018b). Tax challenges arising from digitalisation –Interim report 2018. Inclusive framework on BEPS. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264293083-enhttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264293083-en.pdf?expires=164 4876330&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=C23F5BBCC4E6B56E855AFC7D250A0DCD

57.

OECD . (2018a). OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS. Progress Report July 2017-June 2018. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/inclusive-framework-on-beps-progress-report-july-2017-june-2018.pdf

58.

OECD . (2019a). Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy–Policy Note. OECD Publishing.

59.

OECD . (2019b). Programme of Work to Develop a Consensus Solution to the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy, OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS. OECD. www.oecd.org/tax/beps/programme-of-work-to-develop-a-consensus-solution-to-the-tax-challenges-arising-from-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy.htm

60.

OECD . (2019c). Global Anti-Base Erosion Proposal (“GloBE”) Pillar Two. Public Consultation Document. OECD Publishing.

61.

OECD . (2020a). Global Anti-Base Erosion Proposal (Pillar Two – Addressing the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy) Pillar Two Blueprint. OECD Publishing.

62.

OECD . (2020b). Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation–Economic Impact Assessment. OECD Publishing Paris. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/0e3cc2d4-en.pdf?expires=1602779471&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=1A02F0538BFF4E900F0E5D103736B6BD

63.

OECD . (2021). Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two). OCDE. Tomado de https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/tax-challenges-arising-from-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy-global-anti-base-erosion-model-rules-pillar-two.htm

64.

OECD . (2022a). OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations 2022. OECD Publishing.

65.

OECD . (2022b). Pillar One–Amount A: Draft Model Rules for Nexus and Revenue Sourcing (Public Consultation Document.

66.

Ogawa

(2021). Still Under-Taxing the Digital MNE? Assessing the Tax Principles of Pillar One in the BEPS Project. University of Tokyo. http://www.cirje.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research/03research02dp.html

67.

Olbert

Spengel

(2019). Taxation in the Digital Economy–Recent Policy Developments and the Question of Value Creation. Zew. Discussion paper Nº 19-010.

68.

Olney

(2013). A race to the bottom? Employment protection and foreign direct Investment. Journal of International Economics, 91(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.08.003

69.

Piketty

(2016). Capital in the XXI Century. Belknap Press, Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289

70.

Prescott-Haar

Day

(2020). The Pillar One Blueprint–the Potential Future of International Taxation and Transfer Pricing. MNE Tax – Multinational Group Tax & Transfer Pricing News.

71.

PwC . (2021). Global Top 100 Companies by Market Capitalization. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/audit-assurance/publications/global-top-100-companies.html

72.

Richter

(2022). Granting Market Countries the Right to Tax Profit Without Physical Nexus. CESifo. Working Papers 9556/2022. https://www.cesifo.org/en/publikationen/2022/working-paper/granting-market-countries-right-tax-profit-without-physical-nexus

73.

Rodrik

(2012). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. W Norton & Co Inc. ISBN 978-0393341287.

74.

Rodrik

(2017). Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for A Sane World Economy. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-84-234-2998-1.

75.

Rosembuj

. (2019). La Fiscalidad Digital. El Pilar 1 y 2 De La, OCDE. http://elfisco.com/1751-2

76.

Rosembuj

. (2021). Tax Complexity and the Return of the State. elfisco.com. http://elfisco.com/articulos/tax-complexity-and-the-return-of-the-state-a-tribute-to-pierre-bourdieu

77.

Ruding

(1992). Conclusions and Recommendations of the Committee of Independent Experts on Company Taxation. European Commission. ISBN 92- 826-3990-8.

78.

Saez

Zucman

(2021). El Triunfo De La Injusticia. Cómo Los Ricos Eluden Impuestos Y Cómo Hacerles Pagar. Taurus.

79.

Serrano Antón

(2019). Conceptos Básicos De La Fiscalidad Internacional. En “Tratado De Fiscalidad Internacional”, 5575. Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. ISBN 978-9978-19-922-0.

80.

Sorbe

Johansson

Å.

(2017). International Tax Planning, Competition, and Market Structure. OECD Economics Department, Working Papers, 1358. OECD Publishing Paris.

81.

Stiglitz

J. E.

(2000). Capital market liberalization, economic growth, and instability. World Development, 28(6), 1075–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-750x(00)00006-1

82.

Stiglitz

J. E.

(2017). Globalization and Its Discontents. Anti-Globalization in the Era of Trump. W. W. Norton and Company. ISBN 9780393355161.

83.

Tax Justice . (2020). Review of BEPS Action 13: The Need for Public Country-By-Country Reporting. Meeting to Discuss the Public Consultation on the Review of Country-by-Country Reporting. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/presentation-2020-review-of-country-by-country-reporting-public-consultation-meeting-may-2020.pdf

84.

Torslov

T. R.

Wier

L. S.

Zucman

(2020). Externalities in International Tax Enforcement: Theory and Evidence. National Bureau of Economic Research, (26899). https://doi.org/10.3386/w26899

85.

UN . (2020). Tax Treatment of Payments for Digital Services. United Nations Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters, 20th session, United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/financing/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.financing/files/2020-08/TAX%20TREATY%20PROVISION%20ON%20PAYMENTS%20FOR%20DIGITAL%20SERVICES.pdf

86.

Wagh

(2016). The taxation of digital transactions in India: The new equalization levy. Bulletin of International Taxation, 70, 543.