BerkR. A. (2004). Regression analysis: A constructive critique. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BerkR. A. (2007). Statistical inference and meta-analysis (with discussion). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 247–297.
3.
BerkR. A.BrownL.BujaA.GeorgeE.PitkinE.ZhangK.ZhaoL. (2014). Misspecified mean function regression: Making good use of regression models that are wrong. Sociological Methods and Research, 43, 422–451.
4.
BerkR. A.FreedmanD. A. (2003). Statistical assumptions as empirical commitments. In BlombergT. G.CohenS. (Eds.), Punishment and social control (2nd ed., pp. 235–254). New York, NY: de Gruyter.
5.
BerkR. A.PitkinE.BrownL.BujaA.GeorgeE.ZhaoL. (2014). Covariance adjustments for the analysis of randomized field experiments. Evaluation Review, 37, 170–196.
6.
FreedmanD. A. (2008a). On regression adjustments to experimental data. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 40, 180–193.
7.
FreedmanD. A. (2008b). On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments. Annals of Applied Statistics, 2, 176–196.
8.
LehmannE. L. (1999). Elements of large-sample theory. New York, NY: Springer.
LinW. (2013). Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman’s critique. Annals of Applied Statistics, 7, 295–318.
12.
ReichardtC. S.GollobH. F. (1999). Justifying the use and increasing the power of a t test for a randomized experiment with a convenience sample. Psychological Methods, 4, 117–128.
