BerkR.BarnesG.AhlmanL.KurtzE.. 2010. “When Second Best is Good Enough: A Comparison between a True Experiment and a Regression Discontinuity Quasi-experiment.”Journal of Experimental Criminology6:159–90.
2.
BragaA. A.WeisburdD. L.. In press. “Must We Settle for Less Rigorous Evaluations in Large Area-based Crime Prevention Programs? Lessons from a Campbell Review of Focused Deterrence.”Unpublished manuscript.
3.
BragaA. A.WelshB. C.PapachristosA. V.SchnellC.GrossmanL.. 2013. “The Growth of Randomized Experiments in Policing: The Vital Few and the Salience of Mentoring.”Journal of Experimental Criminology. doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9183-2
4.
FarringtonD. P.GottfredsonD.ShermanL. W.WelshB. C.. 2006. “The Maryland Scientific Methods Scale.” In Evidence-based Crime Prevention. Rev. ed., edited by ShermanL. W.FarringtonD. P.WelshB. C.MacKenzieD. L., 13–21. New York: Routledge.
5.
FarringtonD. P.WelshB. C.. 2006. “A Half Century of Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice.”Crime and Justice34:55–132.
6.
LinW.2013. “Agnostic Notes on Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Reexamining Freedman’s Critique.”Annals of Applied Statistics7:295–318.
7.
MazerolleL.AntrobusE.BennettS.TylerT.. 2013. “Shaping Citizen Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: A Randomized Field Trial of Procedural Justice.”Criminology51:33–64.
8.
NaginD.WeisburdD.. 2013. “Evidence and Public Policy: The Example of Evaluation Research in Policing.”Criminology and Public Policy12:651–79.
9.
RosenbaumP.RubinD.. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.”Biometrika70:41–55.
10.
RosenbaumP.RubinD.. 1985. “Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods that Incorporate the Propensity Score.”American Statistician39:33–38.
11.
ShadishW. R.ClarkM. H.SteinerP. M.. 2008. “Can Nonrandomized Experiments Yield Accurate Answers? A Randomized Experiment Comparing Random to Nonrandom Assignment.”Journal of the American Statistical Association103:1334–43.
ShermanL.GottfredsonD.MacKenzieD. L.EckJ.ReuterP.BushwayS., eds. 1997. Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
14.
WeisburdD.2003. “Ethical Practice and Evaluation of Interventions in Crime and Justice: The Moral Imperative for Randomized Trials.”Evaluation Review27:336–54.
15.
WeisburdD.GillC.. 2013. “Block Randomized Trials at Places: Rethinking the Limitations of Small N Experiments.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology. doi:10.1007/s10940-013-9196-z
16.
WeisburdD.LumC.PetrosinoA.. 2001. “Does Research Design Affect Study Outcomes in Criminal Justice?”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science578:50–70.
17.
WelshB. C.PeelM.FarringtonD. P.ElffersH.BragaA. A.. 2011. “Research Design Influence on Study Outcomes in Crime and Justice: A Partial Replication with Public Area Surveillance.”Journal of Experimental Criminology7:183–98.