This article describes the methodology used in the 2007 U.S. National Roadside Survey to estimate the prevalence of alcohol- and drug-impaired driving and alcohol- and drug-involved driving. This study involved randomly stopping drivers at 300 locations across the 48 continental U.S. states at sites selected through a stratified random sampling procedure. Data were collected during a 2-hr Friday daytime session at 60 locations and during 2-hr nighttime weekend periods at 240 locations. Both self-report and biological measures were taken. Biological measures included breath alcohol measurements from 9,413 respondents, oral fluid samples from 7,719 respondents, and blood samples from 3,276 respondents.
American Psychiatric Association. 1994. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
2.
BaborT. F.de la FuenteJ. R.SaundersJ.GrantM.1992. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Health Care.
Geneva: World Health Organization.
3.
BlombergR. D.PeckR. C.MoskowitzH.BurnsM.FiorentinoD.2009. “The Long Beach/Fort Lauderdale Relative Risk Study.”Journal of Safety Research, 40, 285–92.
4.
BlombergRichard D.PeckRaymond C.MoskowitzHerbertBurnsMarcellineFiorentinoDary2005. Crash Risk of Alcohol Involved Driving: A Case-Control Study.
Stamford, CT: Dunlap & Associates.
5.
BorkensteinR. F.CrowtherR. F.ShumateR. P.ZielW. B.ZylmanR.1974. “The Role of the Drinking Driver in Traffic Accidents.”Blutalkohol, 11, 1–132.
6.
ChristophersenA. S.1986. “Tetrahydrocannabinol Stability in Whole Blood: Plastic Versus Glass Containers.”Journal of Analytic Toxicology, 10, 129–31.
7.
ChungT.ColbyS. M.BarnettN. P.MontiP. M.2002. “Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Factor Structure in an Adolescent Emergency Department Sample.”Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26, 223–31.
8.
ChurchA. H.1993. “Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis.”Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 62–79.
9.
ConleyT. B.2001. “Construct Validity of the MAST and AUDIT with Multiple Offender Drunk Drivers.”Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20, 287–95.
10.
CottlerL. B.GrantB. F.BlaineJ.MavreasV.PullC.HasinD.ComptonW. M.Rubio-StipecM.MagerD.1997. “Concordance of DSM-IV Alcohol and Drug use Disorder Criteria and Diagnoses as Measured by AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN.”Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 47, 195–205.
11.
DrummerO. H.GerostamoulosJ.BaatzirisH.ChuM.CaplehornJ.RobertsonM. D.SwannP.2004. “The Involvement of Drugs in Drivers of Motor Vehicle Skilled in Australian Motor Vehicle Crashes.”Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 239–48.
12.
DussaultC.BraultM.BouchardJ.LemireA. M.. 2002. “The Contribution of Alcohol and Other Drugs Among Fatally Injured Drivers in Quebec: Some Preliminary Results.” In Proceedings of Alcohol, Drugs & Traffic Safety - T 2002: 16th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs & Traffic Safety, August 4-9, 2002, edited by MayhewD. R.DussaultC.Montreal, Canada: International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety (ICADTS)
13.
Furr-HoldenC. DebraRobertB. VoasJohnLaceyEduardoRomanoKristinaJones2011. “The Prevalence of Alcohol use Disorders Among Nighttime Weekend Drivers.”Addiction, 106, 1221–7.
14.
Furr-HoldenDebraRobertB. VoasJohnLaceyTaraKelley-BakerEduardoRomanoMieka Smart2009. “Toward National Estimates of Alcohol Use Disorders Among Drivers: Results from the National Roadside Survey Pilot Program.”Traffic Injury Prevention, 10, 403–9.
15.
GrantB. F.DawsonD. A.1997. “Prevalence and Correlates of Alcohol use and DSM-IV Alcohol Dependence in the United States: Results of the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey.”Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 464–73.
16.
HolcombR. L.1938. “Alcohol in Relation to Traffic Accidents.”Journal of the American Medical Association, 111, 1076–85.
17.
KigerStevenDianeLestinaAdrianLund1993. “Passive Alcohol Sensors in Law Enforcement Screening for Alcohol-Impaired Drivers.”Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 9, 7–18.
18.
LaceyJohn H.Kelley-BakerT.Furr-HoldenC. D. M.BrainardK.MooreC.2007. Pilot Test of New Roadside Survey Methodology for Impaired Driving.
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
19.
LaceyJohn H.Kelley-BakerTaraDebra Furr-HoldenC. D. M.VoasRobert B.MooreChristineBrainardKatharineScott TippettsA.RomanoEduardoTorresPedroBerningAmy2009. 2007 National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers: Methodology.
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
20.
LaceyJohn H.Kelley-BakerT.Furr-HoldenC. D. M.VoasR.RomanoE.RamirezA.BrainardK.MooreC.TorresP.BerningA.2009. 2007 National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers: Drug Results.
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
21.
LaceyJohn H.Kelley-BakerT.Furr-HoldenC. D. M.VoasR.RomanoE.TorresP.TippettsA. S.RamirezA.BrainardK.BerningA.2009. 2007 National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers: Alcohol Results.
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
22.
LestinaDiane C.GreeneMichaelVoasRobert B.WellsJoAnn1999. “Sampling Procedures and Survey Methodologies for the 1996 Survey with Comparisons to Earlier National Roadside Surveys.”Evaluation Review, 23, 28–46.
23.
LundA. K.WolfeA. C.1991. “Changes in the incidence of alcohol-impaired driving in the United States, 1973-1986.”Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52(4), 293–301
24.
MovicK. L. L.AtthhjssenM. P. M.NagelP. H. A.Van EgmondT.GierJ. J.LeutkensH. G. M.EgbertsA. C. G.2004. “Psychoactive Substance and the Risk of Motor Vehicle Accidents.”Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 631–6.
25.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 1991. Alcohol Limits for Drivers: A Report on the Effects of Alcohol and Expected Institutional Responses to New Limits (DOT HS 807 692).
Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.
26.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 1993. Digest of Alcohol-Highway Safety Related Legislation.
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
27.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2004. “Drugs and Human Performance Fact Sheet” (Final Report DOT HS 809 725).
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
28.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. 2010. National Drug Control Strategy, 2010.
Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy.
29.
PullC. B.SaundersJ. B.MavreasV.CottlerL. B.GrantB. F.HasinD. S.BlaineJ.MagerD.UstunB. T.1997. “Concordance Between ICD-10 Alcohol and Drug use Disorder Criteria and Diagnoses as Measured by the AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN: Results of a Cross-National Study.”Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 47, 207–16.
30.
RamaekersJ. G.BerghousG.van LaarM.DrummerO. H.2004. “Dose Related Risk of Motor Vehicle Crashes After Cannabis Use.”Drug Alcohol Dependence, 73, 109–19.
31.
RobertsonM. D.DrummerO. H.1994. “A methodology to study the effect of drugs in driving.”Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 243–247
32.
SingerE.GeblerN.RaghunathanT.Van HoewykJ.McGonagleK.1999. “The Effect of Incentives in Interviewer-Mediated Surveys.”Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 217–30.
33.
SoderstromC. A.BallesterosM. F.DischingerP. C.KernsT. J.FlintR. D.SmithG. S.2001. “Alcohol/Drug Abuse, Driving Convictions, and Risk-Taking Dispositions Among Trauma Center Patients.”Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33, 771–82.
34.
TerhuneK. W.IppolitoC. A.HendricksD. L.MichalovicJ. G.BogemaS. C.SantingaP.BlombergR.PreusserD. F.1992. The Incidence and Role of Drugs in Fatally Injured Drivers (DOT HS 808 065).
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
35.
ToennesS. W.KauertG. F.2001. Importance of Vacutainer Selection in Forensic Toxicological Analysis of Drugs of Abuse.”Journal of Analytic Toxicology, 25, 339–43.
36.
TourangeauRoger.2003. Recurring Surveys: Issues and Opportunities.
Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
37.
TownsendT. N.LaneJ.DewaC. S.BrittinghamA. M.1998. Driving After Drug or Alcohol Use: Findings from the 1996 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (SMA).
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
38.
VerstraeteA.RaesE.2006. Rosita-2 Project.
Belgium: Ghent University, Department of Clinical Biology.
39.
VoasRobert B.WellsJ.LestinaD.WilliamsA.GreeneM.1998. “Drinking and driving in the United States: The 1996 National Roadside Survey.”Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(2), 267–275
40.
WolfeA. C.1974. “1973 U.S. national roadside breath testing survey: Procedures and results.” Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Safety Research Institute
41.
ZadorPaul L.KrawchukSheila A.VoasRobert B.2000. “Alcohol-Related Relative Risk of Driver Fatalities and Driver Involvement in Fatal Crashes in Relation to Driver Age and Gender: An Update Using 1996 Data.”Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 387–95.
