Mandatory,Preferred,or Discretionary: How the Classification of Domestic Violence Warrantless Arrest Laws Impacts Their Estimated Effects on Intimate Partner Homicide
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2011
Mandatory,Preferred,or Discretionary: How the Classification of Domestic Violence Warrantless Arrest Laws Impacts Their Estimated Effects on Intimate Partner Homicide
Warrantless arrest laws for domestic violence (DV) are generally classified as discretionary, preferred, or mandatory, based on the level of power accorded to police in deciding whether to arrest. However, there is a lack of consensus in the literature regarding how each state’s law should be categorized. Using three classification schemes, this study examined whether variations among these schemes impact research outcomes by analyzing the effects of discretionary, preferred, and mandatory warrantless arrest laws on intimate partner homicide (IPH). Variations in classification schemes and in the dates of law passage presented in the literature resulted in differing estimated effects of the laws.
Alliance for Non-Custodial Parents Rights.2007. ‘‘Mandatory Arrest for Domestic Violence Doesn’t Work-Even Harvard Says So.’’ Accessed Dec 2, 2010 . http://ancpr.com/2007/08/11/mandatory-arrest-for-domestic-violence-doesntwork-even-harvard-says-so-81007/
2.
Bureau of Justice Statistics.2005. ‘‘Prisoners Under State or Federal Jurisdiction Sentenced to More than One Year.’’ Accessed May 29, 2009. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2061
3.
Buzawa, E.S., and C.G. Buzawa.1993. ‘‘The Impact of Arrest on Domestic Violence.’’ American Behavioral Scientist36:558-74.
4.
Committee on Ways and Means.1996. 1996 Green Book. Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives.
5.
---. 1998. 1998 Green Book. Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives.
6.
---. 2000. 2000 Green Book. Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives.
7.
---. 2004. 2004 Green Book. Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives.
8.
Death Penalty Information Center.2009. ‘‘State by State Database.’’ Accessed June 6, 2009. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/state_by_state
9.
Donohue, J.J., and J. Wolfers.2009. ‘‘Estimating the Impact of the Death Penalty on Murder.’’American Law and Economics Review11:249-309.
10.
Dugan, L., D.S. Nagin, and R. Rosenfeld.2001. Exposure Reduction or Backlash? The Effects of Domestic Violence Resources on Intimate Partner Homicide, Final Report. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Justice.
11.
Fox, J.A., and M.L. Swatt.2009. Uniform Crime Reports [United States]: Supplementary Homicide Reports With Multiple Imputation, Cumulative Files 1976-2007 [Computer file]. ICPSR24801-v1. Ann Arbor, MI : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
12.
Gruber, J.2004. ‘‘Is Making Divorce Easier Bad for Children? The Long-Run Implications of Unilateral Divorce.’’ Journal of Labor Economics22:799-833.
Hirschel, D., E. Buzawa, A. Pattavina, D. Faggiani, and M. Reuland.2007. Explaining the Prevalence, Context, and Consequences of Dual Arrest in Intimate Partner Cases. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Justice .
15.
Hirschel, D., and I.W. Hutchison.2003. ‘‘The Voices of Domestic Violence Victims: Predictors of Victim Preference for Arrest and the Relationship Between Preference for Arrest and Revictimiization.’’ Crime & Delinquency49:313-36.
16.
Hoctor, M.M.1997. ‘‘Domestic Violence as a Crime Against the State: The Need for Mandatory Arrest in California.’’ California Law Review85:643-700.
17.
Iyengar, R.2007. ‘‘The Protection Battered Spouses Don’t Need.’’The New York Times, August 7, 2007. Accessed December 2, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/opinion/07iyengar.html
18.
---. 2009. ‘‘Does the Certainty of Arrest Reduce Domestic Violence? Evidence From Mandatory and Recommended Arrest Laws.’’Journal of Public Economics93:85-98.
19.
Johnson, I.M.2007. ‘‘Victims’ Perceptions of Police Response to Domestic Violence Incidents.’’ Journal of Criminal Justice35:498-510.
20.
Leeb, H., and B.M. Potscher.2005. ‘‘Model Selection and Inference: Facts and Fiction.’’ Econometric Theory21:21-59.
21.
Miller, N.2004. Domestic Violence: A Review of State Legislation Defining Police and Prosecution Duties and Powers. Alexandria, VA : Institute for Law and Justice.
22.
Mills, L.G.1999. ‘‘Killing her Softly: Intimate Abuse and the Violence of State Intervention.’’ Harvard Law Review113:550-613.
23.
PR Newswire.2010. ‘‘The Cost of Mandatory Arrest: 600 Lives a Year.’’PR Newswire, November 8, 2010. Accessed December 2, 2010. http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-cost-of-mandatory-arrest-600-lives-a-year-106884073.html
24.
Rajah, V., V. Frye, and M. Haviland.2006. ‘‘‘Aren’t I a Victim?’: Notes on Identity Challenges Relating to Police Action in a Mandatory Arrest Jurisdiction.’’ Violence Against Women12:897-916.
25.
Rosenthal, M.2007. ‘‘Mandatory Arrest for Partner Abuse Increases Homicides, Harvard Researcher Reports.’’ Accessed Dec 2, 2010. http://www.mediaradar.org/press_release_20070808.php
26.
Sherman, L.W., and R.A. Berk.1984. ‘‘The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault.’’ American Sociological Review49:261-72.
27.
Simpson, S.S., L.A. Bouffard, J. Garner, and L. Hickman.2006. ‘‘The Influence of Legal Reform on the Probability of Arrest in Domestic Violence Cases. ’’ Justice Quarterly23:297-316.
28.
Stark, Evan.1993. ‘‘Mandatory Arrest of Batterers: A Reply to its Critics.’’ American Behavioral Scientist36:651-80.
29.
Thurman v. City of Torrington. 1984. In Federal Supplement: D. Conn.
30.
Toon, R., B. Hart, N. Welch, N. Coronado, and D. Hunting.2005. Layers of Meaning: Domestic Violence and Law Enforcement Attitudes in Arizona. Tempe, AZ: Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
31.
U.S. Census Bureau.1973. Census of the Population, 1970. Volume 1, Characteristics of the Population. Vol. state volumes. Washington, DC: USGPO.
32.
---. 1981. 1980 Census of the Population. Volume 1, Characteristics of the Population. Vol. state volumes. Washington, DC: USGPO.
33.
---. 1991. ‘‘Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Summary File 1 [Website].’’ Accessed June 26, 2006 . http:\\factfinder.census.gov
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Federal Bureau Investigation.2007. Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, 1975-2006 [Computer files]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. ICPSR04721.
36.
Wadsworth, T., and J.M. Roberts.2008. ‘‘When Missing Data are not Missing: A New Approach to Evaluating Supplemental Homicide Report Imputation Strategies.’’ Criminology46:841-70.
37.
Williams, K.R.2005. ‘‘Arrest and Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a More Complete Application of Deterrence Theory.’’ Aggression and Violent Behavior10:660-79.
