Child support enforcement (CSE) has experienced dramatic changes in the last decade; however, it is not clear whether child support staff is fully aware of the development. Using data from the New Jersey child support training program (n = 530), this article aims to evaluate the professional knowledge of child support staff. The results show that participants answered 55% of the questions on CSE correctly in the pretraining assessment. After the training, the participants answered 77% of all questions correctly. The findings reveal an urgent need for training for child support staff in a rapidly changing profession.
Cancian, M., and D.R. Meyer.2006. Child support and the economy. In Working and poor: How economic and policy changes are affecting low-wage staff, eds., R. M. Blank, S. H. Danziger, and R. F. Schoeni, 338-65. New York: Russell Sage.
2.
Cancian, M., D.R. Meyer, and J. Roff.2007. Testing new ways to increase the economic well-being of single-parent families: The effects of child support policies on welfare participants. Institute for Research on Poverty , Discussion Paper no. 1330-07.
3.
Case, A.C., I.F. Lin, and S.S. McLanahan.2003. Explaining trends in child support: Economic, demographic, and policy effects. Demography40:171-89.
4.
Cassetty, J.H., and R. Hutson.2005. Effectiveness of federal incentives in shaping child support enforcement outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review27:271-89.
5.
Freeman, R.B., and J. Waldfogel.2001. Dunning delinquent dads: The effect of child support enforcement policy on child support receipt by never married women. Journal of Human Resources36:207-25.
6.
Garfinkel, I., and P. Robins.1994. The relationship between child support enforcement tools and child support outcomes. In Child support and child well-being, eds., I. Garfinkel, S. S. McLanahan, and P. Robins, 133-71. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
7.
Garfinkel, I., D.R. Meyer, and S.S. McLanahan.1998. A brief history of child support policies in the United States. In Fathers under fire: The revolution in child support enforcement, eds., I. Garfinkel , S. S. McLanahan, D. R. Meyer, and J. A. Seltzer, 14-30. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8.
Garfinkel, I., C. Miller, S.S. McLanahan, and T.L. Hanson.1998. Deadbeat dads or inept states? A comparison of child support enforcement systems. Evaluation Review22:717-50.
9.
Grall, T.S.2006. Custodial mothers and fathers and their child support: 2003. U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-230.
10.
Hanson, T.L., I. Garfinkel, S.S. McLanahan, and C. Miller.1996. Trends in child support outcomes. Demography33:483-96.
11.
Huang, C., I. Garfinkel, and J. Waldfogel.2004. Child support enforcement and welfare caseload. Journal of Human Resources39:108-34.
12.
Huang, C., R.L. Edwards, and R.B. Nolan.2008. State performance on child support enforcement under CSPIA. Journal of Policy Practice7:280-97.
13.
Huang, C., and R.L. Edwards.2009. The relationship between state efforts and child support performance. Children and Youth Services Review31:241-8.
14.
Lerman, R.I., and E. Sorenson.2003. Child support: Interactions between private and public transfers. In Means-tested transfer programs in the United States, ed., R. Moffitt, 587-628. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
15.
Pirog, M.A., and K.M. Ziol-Guest .2006. Child support enforcement: Programs and policies, impacts and questions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management25:943-90.
16.
Sorensen, E.J., and J. Hill.2004. Single mothers and their child support receipt: How well is child support enforcement doing? Journal of Human Resources39:135-54.
17.
U.S. Census Bureau, Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division.2007. America’s families and living arrangements: 2006. http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/hh-fam/cps2006.html (accessed November 1, 2007).
18.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means.2004. Overview of entitlement programs, 2002 green book. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
