Social care at home for elderly people is now growing rapidly in France. A new question is, What are better forms of care for the different partners concerned? The research presented here, and made for the Comity of Lille Employment Area with cooperation of the Caisse Primaire d’Assurance Maladiede Lille (the local board of the national social security system), offers some answers to that question. Ceteris paribus, cultural activities—in a group or at home—versus others appear to produce more interest for elderly, professional caregivers, and the rest of society.
Alicot, F., C. Antolini, and F. Turck. 2000. Etude d’impact des salariés emploi jeune dans les maisons de retraite. Lusigny-sur-Ouche, France: ASDIC.
2.
Blomberg, T. G., and G. P. Waldo, eds. 2002. Implementing an evaluation research and accountability-driven system for juvenile justice education in Florida. Evaluation Review26 (3): 239-240.
3.
EFAS/ARRFAP. 2001. Nouvelles activités en gérontologie. Référentiels d’emplois/compétences. Working paper, Lille, France.
4.
Gardin, L. 2001. Les externalités positives ou bénéfices sociaux des nouveaux services en gérontologie. Paris: CRIDA.
5.
Gardin, L., and M. Veyrières. 2000. Des associations réussissent la pérennisation de leurs services: la preuve par neuf. Lille, France: CRIDA and Comité de Bassin d’Emploi.
6.
House, J. S., K. R. Landis, and D. Umberson. 1988. Social relationships and health. Science241 (4865): 540-545.
7.
Molinari, C., M. Ahern, and M. Hendryx. 1998. The relationship of community quality to the health of women and men. Social Science and Medicine47 (8): 1113-1120.
8.
Waltz, M.1986. A longitudinal study on environmental and dispositional determinants of life quality: Social support and coping with physical illness. Social Indicators Research18 (1): 71-93.
9.
Yates, B. T.1996. Analysing costs, procedures, processes, and out comes in human services. London: Sage.
