This article (which is mainly expository) sets up graphical models for causation, having a bit less than the usual complement of hypothetical counterfactuals. Assuming the invariance of error distributions may be essential for causal inference, but the errors themselves need not be invariant. Graphs can be interpreted using conditional distributions, so thatwe can better address connections between the mathematical framework and causality in the world. The identification problem is posed in terms of conditionals. As will be seen, causal relationships cannot be inferred from a data set by running regressions unless there is substantial prior knowledge about the mechanisms that generated the data. There are fewsuccessful applications of graphicalmodels, mainly because few causal pathways can be excluded on a priori grounds. The invariance conditions themselves remain to be assessed.
Abbott, A.1997. Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces75:1149-1182.
2.
Abbott, A.1998. The causal devolution. Sociological Methods and Research27:148-181.
3.
Angrist, J. D.2001. Estimation of limited dependent variable models with binary endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics19:2-16.
4.
Angrist, J. D., G. W. Imbens, and D. B. Rubin. 1996. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association91:444-472.
5.
Angrist, J. D., and A. K. Krueger. 2001. Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics19:2-16.
6.
Berk, R. A.2003. Regression analysis: A constructive critique. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Brady, H., and D. Collier, eds. Forthcoming. Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
Carmelli, D., and W. F. Page. 1996. 24-year mortality in smoking-discordantWorldWar II U. S. male veteran twins. International Journal of Epidemiology25:554-559.
9.
Cartwright, N.1989. Nature’s capacities and their measurement. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
10.
Clogg, C. C., and A. Haritou. 1997. The regression method of causal inference and a dilemma confronting this method. In Causality in crisis? edited by V. McKim and S. Turner, 83-112. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
11.
Cochran, W. G.1957. Analysis of covariance: Its nature and uses. Biometrics13:261-281.
12.
Cook T. D., and D. T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design& analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
13.
Dabrowska, D., and T. Speed, trans. 1990. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: Essay on principles, by J. Neyman. Statistical Science5:463-480(with discussion).
14.
Dawid, A. P.2000. Causal inference without counterfactuals. Journal of the American Statistical Association95:407-448.
15.
Engle, R. F., D. F. Hendry, and J. F. Richard. 1983. Exogeneity. Econometrica51:277-304.
16.
Fisher, R. A.1959. Smoking: The cancer controversy. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd.
17.
Freedman, D. A.1985. Statistics and the scientific method. In Cohort analysis in social research: Beyond the identification problem(with discussion), edited by W. M. Mason and S. E. Fienberg, 343-390. New York: Springer-Verlag.
18.
Freedman, D. A.1987. As others see us: A case study in path analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics12:101-223 (with discussion). Reprinted in The role of models in nonexperimental social science, edited by J. Shaffer, 3-125, Washington, DC: AERA/ASA, 1992.
19.
Freedman, D. A.1991. Statistical models and shoe leather. In Sociological Methodology 1991(with discussion), edited by Peter Marsden, chap. 10. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
20.
Freedman, D. A.1995. Some issues in the foundation of statistics. Foundations of Science1:19-83 (with discussion). Reprinted in Some issues in the foundation of statistics, edited by B. C. van Fraasen, 19-83, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer, 1997.
21.
Freedman, D. A.1997. From association to causation via regression. In Causality in crisis?(with discussion), edited by V. McKim and S. Turner, 113-182. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
22.
Freedman, D. A.1999. From association to causation: Some remarks on the history of statistics. Statistical Science14:243-258. Reprinted in Journal de la Société Française de Statistique 140(1999): 5-32; and in Stochastic musings: Perspectives from the pioneers of the late 20th century, edited by J. Panaretos, 45-71, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum, 2003.
23.
Freedman, D. A., T. Rothenberg, and R. Sutch. 1983. On energy policy models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics1:24-36 (with discussion).
24.
Freedman, D. A., and P. B. Stark. 1999. The swine flu vaccine and Guillain-Barr é syndrome: A case study in relative risk and specific causation. Evaluation Review23:619-647.
25.
Gigerenzer, G.1996. Onnarrownorms and vague heuristics. Psychological Review103:592-596.
26.
Gill, R. D., and J. M. Robins. Forthcoming. Causal inference for complex longitudinal data: The continuous case. Annals of Statistics.
27.
Goldthorpe, J. H.1998. Causation, statistics and sociology. Twenty-ninth Geary Lecture, Nuffield College, Oxford. Dublin, Ireland: Economic and Social Research Institute.
28.
Goldthorpe, J. H.2001. Causation, statistics, and sociology. European Sociological Review17:1-20.
29.
Greenland, S., J. Pearl, and J. Robins. 1999. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology10:37-48.
30.
Heckman, J. J.2000. Causal parameters and policy analysis in economics: A twentieth century retrospective. Quarterly Journal of Economics105:45-97.
31.
Heckman, J. J.2001a. Econometrics and empirical economics. Journal of Econometrics100:3-5.
32.
Heckman, J. J.2001b. Micro data, heterogeneity, and the evaluation of public policy: Nobel lecture. Journal of Political Economy109:673-748.
33.
Hedström, P., and R. Swedberg, eds. 1998. Social mechanisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Hendry, D. F.2000. Econometrics—Alchemy or science?Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
35.
Hodges, J. L., Jr., and E. Lehmann. 1964. Basic concepts of probability and statistics. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
36.
Holland, P.1986. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association8:945-960.
37.
Holland, P.1988. Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equation models. In Sociological Methodology 1988, edited by C. Clogg, chap. 13. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
38.
Humphreys, P.1997. A critical appraisal of causal discovery algorithms. In Causality in crisis? (with discussion), ed. V. McKim and S. Turner, 249-263. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
39.
Humphreys, P., and D. A. Freedman. 1996. The grand leap. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science47:113-123.
40.
Humphreys, P., and D. A. Freedman. 1999. Are there algorithms that discover causal structure?Synthese121:29-54.
41.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1986. Tobacco smoking. Monograph 38. Lyon, France: IARC.
42.
Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, eds. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and bias. Science185:1124-1131.
44.
Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, eds. 2000. Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Kaprio, J., and M. Koskenvuo. 1989. Twins, smoking and mortality: A12-year prospective study of smoking-discordant twin pairs. Social Science and Medicine29: 1083-1089.
46.
Keynes, J. M.1939. Professor Tinbergen’s method. Economic Journal49:558-570.
47.
Keynes, J. M.1940. Comment on Tinbergen’s response. Economic Journal50:154-156.
Lauritzen, S.2001. Causal inference in graphical models. In Complex stochastic systems, edited by O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, D. R. Cox, and C. Klüppelberg, 63-108. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
50.
Leamer, E.1978. Specification searches. New York: John Wiley.
51.
Lieberson, S.1985. Making it count. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
Lieberson, S., and F. B. Lynn. 2002. Barking up the wrong branch: Alternative to the current model of sociological science. Annual Review of Sociology28:1-19.
53.
Liu, T. C.1960. Under-identification, structural estimation, and forecasting. Econometrica28:855-865.
54.
Lucas, R. E., Jr. 1976. Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. In The Philips curve and labor markets, edited by K. Brunner and A. Meltzer. Vol. 1 of the Carnegie-Rochester Conferences on Public Policy, supplementary series to the Journal of Monetary Economics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 19-64 (with discussion).
55.
Manski, C. F.1995. Identification problems in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
Meehl, P. E.1954. Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
57.
Meehl, P. E.1978. Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slowprogress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology46:806-834.
58.
Meehl, P. E., and N. G. Waller. 2002. The path analysis controversy: Anewstatistical approach to strong appraisal of verisimilitude. Psychological Methods7:283-337 (with discussion).
59.
Miller, D. P., D. Neuberg, I. DeVivo, J. C. Wain, T. J. Lynch, L. Su, and D. C. Christiani. 2003. Smoking and the risk of lung cancer: Susceptibility with GSTP1 polymorphisms. Epidemiology14:545-551.
60.
Nakachi, K., K. Ima, S.-I. Hayashi, and K. Kawajiri. 1993. Polymorphisms of the CYP1A1 and Glutathione S-Transferase genes associated with susceptibility to lung cancer in relation to cigarette dose in a Japanese population. Cancer Research53:2994-2999.
61.
Ní Bhrolcháin, M.2001. Divorce effects and causality in the social sciences. European Sociological Review17:33-57.
62.
Oakes, M.1986. Statistical inference. Chestnut Hill, MA: Epidemiology Resources Inc.
63.
Pearl, J.1995. Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika82:669-710 (with discussion).
64.
Pearl, J.2000. Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65.
Pratt, J., and R. Schlaifer. 1984. On the nature and discovery of structure. Journal of the American Statistical Association79:9-21.
66.
Robins, J. M.1986. A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—Application to control of the healthyworker survivor effect. Mathematical Modelling7:1393-1512.
67.
Pratt, J., and R. Schlaifer. 1987. A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods. Journal of Chronic Diseases40 (Suppl. 2): 139S-161S.
68.
Pratt, J., and R. Schlaifer. 1995. Discussion. Biometrika82:695-698.
69.
Pratt, J., and R. Schlaifer. 1999. Association, causation, and marginal structural models. Synthese121:151-179.
70.
Rubin, D.1974. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology66:688-701.
71.
Scharfstein, D. O., A. Rotnitzky, and J. M. Robins. 1999. Adjusting for non-ignorable drop-out using semiparametric non-response models. Journal of the American Statistical Association94:1096-1146 (with discussion).
72.
Sen, A. K.2002. Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73.
Shadish W. R., T. D. Cook, and D. T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
74.
Shields, P. G., N. E. Caporaso, K. T. Falk, H. Sugimura, G. E. Trivers, B. P. Trump, R. N. Hoover, A. Weston, and C. C. Harris. 1993. Lung cancer, race and a CYP1A1 genetic polymorphism. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention2:481-485.
75.
Sims, C. A.1980. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica48:1-47.
76.
Sobel, M. E.2000. Causal inference in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association95:647-651.
77.
Spirtes, P., C. Glymour, and R. Scheines. 1993. Causation, prediction, and search.Springer Lecture Notes in Statistics, no. 81, New York: Springer-Verlag. Second ed.,Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
78.
Steiger, J. H.2001. Driving fast in reverse. Journal of the American Statistical Association96:331-338.
79.
Stone, R.1993. The assumptions on which causal inferences rest. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B55:455-466.
80.
Tinbergen, J.1940. Reply to Keynes. Economic Journal50:141-154.
81.
Wainer, H.1989. Eelworms, bullet holes, and Geraldine Ferraro: Some problems with statistical adjustment and some solutions. Journal of Educational Statistics14: 121-140 (with discussion). Reprinted in The role of models in nonexperimental social science, ed. J. Shaffer, 129-207, Washington, DC: AERA/ASA, 1992.
82.
Woodward, J.1997. Causal models, probabilities, and invariance. In Causality in crisis?(with discussion), edited by V. McKim and S. Turner, 265-315. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
83.
Woodward, J.1999. Causal interpretation in systems of equations. Synthese121:199-247.
84.
Wright, P. G.1928. The tariff on animal and vegetable oils. New York: Macmillan.
