The objective of this article is to evaluate the level of institutionalization of a community action program targeting licensed premises in Stockholm. Five key factors were identified for institutionalization: adoption, sustainability, key leader support, structural changes, and compliance. A scale was developed to assess the strength of each factor. The results indicate a high degree of institutionalization (score 13 on a scale from 5 to 15). The authors conclude that the program activities have been sustained at a high level. A written agreement ensures that the participating organizations take responsibility for the continuing work.
Andréasson, S., B. Lindewald, K. Hjalmarson, J. Larsson, E. Wallin, and C. Rehnman. 1999. Exploring new roads to prevention of alcohol and other drug problems in Sweden: The STAD Project. In Fourth symposium in community action research and the prevention of alcohol and other drug problems, Auckland, New Zealand, ed. S. Casswell, H. Holder, M. Holmila, S. Larsson, R. Midford, H. M. Barnes, P. Nygaard, and L. Stewart, 314-330. Auckland, New Zealand: Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland.
2.
Andréasson, S., B. Lindewald, and C. Rehnman. 2000. Over-serving patrons in licensed premises in Stockholm. Addiction95: 359-363.
3.
Bracht, N., L. Kingsbury, and C. Rissel. 1999. A five-stage community organization model for health promotion: Empowerment and partnership strategies. In Health promotionat the community level, 2nd ed., ed. N. Bracht. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Butterfoss, F. D., R. M. Goodman, and A. Wandersman. 1996. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Education Quarterly23: 65-79.
5.
Holder, H. D.1998. Alcohol and the community: A systems approach to prevention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Holder, H. D., P. J. Gruenewald, W. R. Ponicki, A. J. Treno, J. W. Grube, R. F. Saltz, R. B. Voas, et al. 2000. Effects of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries. Journal of the American Medical Association284: 2341-2347.
7.
Holder, H. D., and R. S. Moore. 2000. Institutionalization of community action projects to reduce alcohol-use related problems: Systematic facilitators. Substance Use & Misuse35: 75-86.
8.
Holmila, M., ed. 1998. Community prevention of alcohol problems. London: Macmillan.
9.
Jepperson, R. L.1991. Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In The new institutionalism in organization alanalysis, ed. W. W. Powell and P. J. Di Maggio,146-163.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
McCarthy, J. D., and M. Wolfson. 1996. Resource mobilization by local social movement organizations: Agency, strategy, and organization in the movement against drinking and driving. American Sociological Review61: 1070-1088.
11.
Moore, R. S., and H. D. Holder. 2003. Issues surrounding the institutionalization of local action programmes to prevent alcohol problems. NAT20 (Eng. supp.): 41-55.
12.
Nationell handlingsplan för att förebygga alkoholskador. 2001. Regeringens proposition 2001/01:20. Stockholm, Sweden: The Social Ministry.
13.
Oldenburg, B. F., J. F. Sallis, M. L. French, and N. Owen. 1999. Health promotion research and the diffusion and institutionalization of interventions. Health Education Research14: 121-130.
14.
Patton, M. Q.1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Pentz, M. P.2000. Institutionalizing community-based prevention through policy change. Journal of Community Psychology28: 257-270.
16.
Rogers, E. M.1995. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed.New York: Free Press.
17.
Socialdepartementet. 2001. Regeringsbeslut S2001/2568/FH. Stockholm, Sweden: The Social Ministry.
18.
Stenberg, R. 1999. Organisationslogik i samverkan. Konsten att organisera samverkan i en imaginär organisation av offentliga aktörer. Ph.D. diss., Stockholms universitet, Psykologiska institutionen.
19.
Wagenaar, A. C., D. M. Murray, J. P. Gehan, M. Wolfson, J. L. Forster, T. L. Toomey, C. L. Perry, and R. Jones-Webb. 2000. Communities mobilizing for change on alcohol: Outcomes from a randomized trial. Journal of Studies on Alcohol61: 85-94.
20.
Wagenaar, A. C., D. M. Murray, and T. Toomey. 2000. Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol (CMCA): Effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes. Addiction95: 209-217.
21.
Wallin, E., and S. Andréasson. 2003. Effects of a communityaction program on problems related to alcohol consumption at licensed premises. Paper presented at the International Research Symposium “Preventing Substance Use, Risky Use and Harm. What Is Evidence-Based Policy?”Fremantle, Australia.
22.
Wallin, E., and S. Andréasson. Forthcoming. Can I have a beer, please? A study of alcohol service to under-aged patrons at licensed premises in Stockholm. Prevention Science.
23.
Wallin, E., J. Gripenberg, and S. Andréasson. 2002. Too drunk for a beer? A study of overserving in Stockholm. Addiction97: 901-907.
24.
Wallin, E., T. Norström, and S. Andréasson. 2003. Alcohol prevention targeting licensed premises: A study of effects on violence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol64: 270-277.
