Schools offer a convenient setting for research on adolescents.However, obtainingactive written parental consent is difficult. In a 6th-grade smoking study, students were recruited with two consent procedures: active consent (parents must provide written consent for their children to participate) and implied consent (children may participate unless their parents provide written refusal). Of 4,427 invited students, 3,358 (76%) provided active parental consent, 420 (9%) provided active parental refusal, and 649 (15%) provided implied consent (parental nonresponse). The implied consent procedure recruited more boys, African Americans, students with poor grades, and smokers. This dual-consentprocedure is useful for collecting some limited data from students who do not provide active consent or refusal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderman, C., A. Cheadle, S. Curry, and P. Diehr. 1995. Selection bias related to parental consent in school-based survey research. Evaluation Review19:663-674.
2.
Baezconde-Garbanati, L. 2001. Understanding tobacco-use research among Hispanic/Latino adolescents: A sociocultural perspective. In National Cancer Institute Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 14: Changing Adolescent Smoking Prevalence: Where It Is and Why, edited by D. M. Burns, chap. 15, 227-241. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.
3.
Belzer, E. G., L. McIntyre, C. Simpson, S. Officer, and N. Stadey. 1993. A method to increase informed consent in school health research. Journal of School Health63:316-317.
4.
Dent, C. W., J. Galaif, S. Sussman, A. Stacy, D. Burton, and B. R. Flay. 1993. Demographic, psychosocial and behavioral differences in samples of actively and passively consented adolescents. Addictive Behaviors18:51-56.
5.
Dent, C. W., S. Y. Sussman, and A. W. Stacy. 1997. The impact of a written parental consent policy on estimates from a school-based drug use survey. Evaluation Review21:698-712.
6.
Esbensen, F. A., E. P. Deschenes, R. E. Vogel, J. West, K. Arboit, and L. Harris. 1996. Active parental consent in school-based research. An examination of ethical and methodological issues. Evaluation Review20:737-753.
7.
Frame, C. L., and C. C. Strauss. 1987.Parental informed consent and sample bias in grade-school children. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology5:227-236.
8.
Grisso, T. 1992. Minors’ assent to behavioral research without parental consent. In Social Research on Children and Adolescents: Ethical Issues, edited by B. Stanley and J. E. Seiber, 109-127. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Harrell, J. S., C. Bradley, J. Dennis, A. C. Frauman, and E. S. Criswell. 2000. School-based research: problems of access and consent. Journal of Pediatric Nursing15:14-21.
10.
Harrington, K. F., D. Binkley, K. D. Reynolds, R. C. Duvall, J. R. Copeland, F. Franklin, and J. Raczynski. 1997. Recruitment issues in school-based research: lessons learned from the High 5 Alabama Project. Journal of School Health67:415-421.
11.
Henry, K. L., E. A. Smith, and A. M. Hopkins. 2002. The effect of active parental consent on the ability to generalize the results of an alcohol, tobacco, and other drug prevention trial to rural adolescents. Evaluation Review26:645-655.
12.
Johnson, K., D. Bryant, E. Rockwell, M. Moore, B. W. Straub, P. Cummings, and C. Wilson. 1999. Obtaining active parental consent for evaluation research: A case study. American Journal of Evaluation20:239-249.
13.
Johnston, L. D., P. M. O’Malley, and J. G. Bachman. 2002. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2001. Volume I: Secondary School Students. NIH Publication No. 02-5106, 1-503. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
14.
Kann, L., S. A. Kinchen, B. I. Williams, J. G. Ross, R. Lowry, J. A. Grunbaum, and L. J. Kolbe. 2000. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 1999. MMWR CDC Surveillance Summaries49:1-32.
15.
Kearney, K. A., R. H. Hopkins, A. L. Mauss, and R. A. Weisheit. 1983. Sample bias resulting from a requirement for written parental consent. Public Opinion Quarterly47:96-102.
16.
Noll, R. B., M. H. Zeller, K. Vannatta, W. M. Bukowski, and W. H. Davies. 1997.Potential bias in classroom research: Comparison of children with permission and those who do not receive permission to participate. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology26:36-42.
17.
O’Donnell, L. N., R. H. Duran, A. San Doval, M. J. Breslin, G. M. Juhn, and A. Stueve. 1997. Obtaining written parent permission for school-based health surveys of urban young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health21:376-383.
18.
Ross, J. G., E. C. Sundberg, and K. H. Flint. 1999. Informed consent in school health research: Why, how, and making it easy. Journal of School Health69:171-176.
19.
Seto, B. 2001. History of medical ethics and perspectives on disparities in minority recruitment and involvement in health research. American Journal of Medical Sciences322:248-252.
20.
Severson, H., and A. Biglan. 1989. Rationale for the use of passive consent in smoking prevention research: Politics, policy, and pragmatics. Preventive Medicine18:267-279.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1991,June 18. Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects. Subpart A: Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects DHHS Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects 56 FR 28003. Washington, DC: USDHHS.
