During the 1960s and 1970s, the California Youth Authority embarked on a series of randomized field trials to test interventions for juvenile and young adult offenders. This article examines the institutional and political reasons why rigorous tests were adopted for such interventions as the Community Treatment Program. It also describes the effect these trials had on the agency and on California justice, as well as how the experimental method eventually became less often used in the Youth Authority. The authors explore some general reasons why this happened.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, Stuart. 1961. Effectiveness of interview therapy with older Youth Authority wards: An interim evaluation of the PICO project. Research Report No. 20. Sacramento: California Youth Authority, Division of Research.
2.
Beattie, R. H. 1957. Measuring the effectiveness of probation. Youth Authority Quarterly10:33-36.
3.
Beattie, R. H., and I. W. Ramseier. 1950. Measuring crime and delinquency. Youth Authority Quarterly3 (3): 8-13.
4.
Berk, Richard A., Robert F. Boruch, D. L. Chambers, Peter H. Rossi, and Ann D. Witte. 1985. Social policy experimentation: A position paper. Evaluation Review9:387-430.
5.
Berkowitz, S. 1978. An evaluation of the Tri-County Reentry Program. Sacramento: California Youth Authority, Division of Research.
6.
Bohnstedt, M. 1975. The evaluation of juvenile diversion programs: Survey of programs. Sacramento: California Youth Authority, Division of Research.
7.
California Legislature. 1958. California Legislature Budget Bill, 1957-1958. Sacramento, CA: Author.
8.
California Legislature. 1959. California Legislature Budget Bill, 1958-1959. Sacramento, CA: Author.
9.
California Youth Authority. 1958. Biennial report, 1957-1958. Sacramento, CA: Author.
10.
California Youth Authority. 1956. Biennial report, 1955-1956. Sacramento, CA: Author.
11.
Campbell, D. T. 1969. Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist24:409-429.
12.
Case, F. E. 1952. Research Committee of the Board of Corrections. Youth Authority Quarterly5 (2): 32-38.
13.
Caspari, G. 1956. Developing a uniform reporting system on youthful offenders. Youth Authority Quarterly9 (1): 23-27.
14.
Cook, T., and M. Payne. 2002. Objecting to the objections to using random assignment in educational research. In Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research, edited by F. Mosteller and R. Boruch, chap. 6. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
15.
Davidson, William S. II, Edward Seidman, Julian Rappaport, Phillip L. Berck, Nancy A. Rapp, Warren A. Rhodes, and Jacob Herring. 1977. Diversion program for juvenile offenders. Social Work Research and Abstracts13:40-49.
16.
Davis, C. 1978. Evaluation of the Youth Training School voluntary program. Sacramento: California Youth Authority, Division of Research.
17.
Empey, L. T. (1980). Field experimentation in criminal justice—Rationale and design. In Handbook of criminal justice evaluation, edited by M. W. Klein and K. S. Teilmann, 143-176. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Farrington, D. P., L. E. Ohlin, and J. Q. Wilson. 1986. Understanding and controlling crime. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19.
Federal Judicial Center Advisory Committee on Experimentation in the Law. 1981. Experimentation in the law. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
20.
Folkard, M. S., A. J. Fowles, B. C. McWilliams, W. McWilliams, D. D. Smith, D. E. Smith, and G. R. Walmsley. 1974. IMPACT: Intensive Matched Probation and After-Care Treatment—The results of the experiment. Vol. 2. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
21.
Fuller, J. K. 1950. Research. Youth Authority Quarterly3 (3): 23-26.
22.
Glaser, D. 1995. Preparing convicts for law-abiding lives: The pioneering penology of Richard A. McGee. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
Greenberg, D., M. Shroder, and M. Onstott. 1999. The social market experiment. Journal of Economic Perspectives13 (3): 157-172.
24.
Griffiths, K. 1958. New Youth Authority research program readied. Youth Authority Quarterly11 (1): 9-13.
25.
Griffiths, K. 1959. The relationship between statistical accounting and research. Youth Authority Quarterly12 (1): 28-32.
26.
Griffiths, K. 1960. The research program of the California Youth Authority. Paper presented to the National Association of Training Schools and Juvenile Agencies, Atlantic City, NJ, 7 June.
27.
Griffiths, K. 1972. Juvenile delinquency needs for research and change. Paper presented at the Criminal Justice Research Conference, San Francisco, March.
28.
Griffiths, K. 1982. Research in the California Youth Authority: Its origins and development. Unpublished manuscript, Division of Research.
29.
Guttman, Evelyn S. (1963). Effects of short-term psychiatric treatment on boys in two California Youth Authority institutions. Research Report No. 36. Sacramento, CA: Department of Youth Authority, Division of Research.
30.
Henggeler, Scott W., Gary B. Melton, Linda A. Smith, Sonja K. Schoenwald, and Jerome H. Hanley. 1993. Family preservation using multisystemic treatment: Long-term follow-up to a clinical trial with serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Child and Family Studies2 (4): 283-293.
31.
Jackson, Patrick C. 1983. Some effects of parole supervision on recidivism. British Journal of Criminology23 (1): 17-34.
32.
Jesness, Carl F. 1971. The Preston Typology Study: An experiment with differential treatment in an institution. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency8 (1): 38-52.
33.
Jesness, Carl F. 1971-1972. Comparative effectiveness of two institutionalized treatment programs for delinquents. Child Care Quarterly1 (2): 119-130.
34.
Jesness, Carl F. 1975. Comparative effectiveness of behavior modification and transactional analysis programs for delinquents. Consulting and Clinical Psychology43 (6): 758-779
35.
Johnson, Bertram M. 1962. Parole performance of the first year's releases—Parole Research Project: Evaluation of reduced caseloads. Research Report No. 27. Sacramento, CA: Department of the Youth Authority, Division of Research.
36.
Kubrick, Stanley (Producer and Director). 1972. A Clockwork Orange. Los Angeles: Warner Brothers.
37.
Lewis, Roy V. 1983. Scared straight—California style: Evaluation of the San Quentin Squires program. Criminal Justice and Behavior10:209-226.
38.
Lipton, Douglas, Robert Martinson, and Judith Wilks. 1975. The effectiveness of correctional treatment. New York: Praeger.
39.
McGee, R. A. 1952. A quarter century of progress in the treatment of the offender. Youth Authority Quarterly5 (1): 6-13.
40.
McGee, R. A. 1961. The new corrections agency. Youth Authority Quarterly14:3-5.
41.
McGee, R. A. 1981. Prisons and politics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
42.
Miech, E. J., B. Nave, and F. Mosteller. 1998. A rare design: The role of field trials in evaluating school practices. Paper presented at the Harvard Children's Initiative Evaluation Task force meeting, October, Cambridge, MA.
43.
Molof, Martin J. 1967. Forestry camp study: Comparison of recidivism rates of camp-eligible boys randomly assigned to camps or institutional programs. Division of Research, California Department of the Youth Authority. Research Report Number 53. Sacramento, CA: Department of the Youth Authority.
44.
Mosteller, F. 1990. Summing up. In The future of meta-analysis, edited by K. W. Wachter and M. L. Straf. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45.
Palmer, Ted. 1971. California's Community Treatment Program for delinquent adolescents. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency8 (1): 74-92.
46.
Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
Petrosino, Anthony, Robert F. Boruch, Lorna Duggan, Haluk Soydan, and Julio Sanchez-Meca. 2001. Meeting the challenges of evidence-based policy: The Campbell Collaboration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science578:14-34.
48.
Petrosino, Anthony J., Robert F. Boruch, Cath Rounding, Steve McDonald, and Iain Chalmers. 2000. The Campbell Collaboration Social, Psychological, Educational and Criminological Trials Register (C2-SPECTR) to facilitate the preparation and maintenance of systematic reviews of social and educational interventions. Evaluation Research in Education14 (3-4): 293-307.
49.
Pond, Esther M. 1970. The Los Angeles Community Delinquency Control Project: An experiment in the rehabilitation of delinquents in an urban community. Research Report No. 50. Sacramento, CA: Department of the Youth Authority.
50.
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. 1967. The challenge of crime in a free society. Task force report: Juvenile delinquency and youth crime. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
51.
Reimer, Ernest, and Martin Warren. 1957. Special intensive parole unit: Relationship between violation rate and initially small caseload. National Probation and Parole Association Journal3 (3): 222-229.
52.
Riecken, Henry W., and Robert F. Boruch. 1974. Social experimentation: A method for planning and evaluating social intervention. New York: Academic Press.
53.
Sechrest, Lee, Susan O. White, and E. D. Brown. 1979. The rehabilitation of criminal offenders: Problems and prospects. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
54.
Seckel, J. P. 1965. Experiments in group counseling at two youth authority institutions. Research Report No. 46. Sacramento, CA: Department of the Youth Authority, Division of Research.
55.
Seckel, J. P. 1967. The Fremont Experiment: Assessment of residential treatment at a Youth Authority Reception Center. Research Report No. 50. Sacramento, CA: Department of the Youth Authority, Division of Research.
56.
Sherman, L. W. 1992. Policing domestic violence. New York: Free Press.
57.
Sherman, L. W., and R. Berk. 1984. The deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review49:261-272.
58.
Sherman, L. W., D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, and S. Bushway. 1997. Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. A report to the United States Congress. College Park: University of Maryland, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice.
59.
Smith, R. L. 1956. The research perspective. Youth Authority Quarterly9:29-34.
60.
Star, D. 1979. Summary parole: A six and twelve month follow-up evaluation. Sacramento, CA: Department of Corrections, Research Unit.
61.
Stark, H. 1956. Editorial. Youth Authority Quarterly9:2.
62.
Wiederanders, M. 1977. Job survival skills: Reports of needs assessment research among California Youth Authority parolees. Interim report. Sacramento: California Youth Authority, Division of Research.
63.
Weisburd, D., and A. Petrosino. Forthcoming. Randomized experiments. In Encyclopedia of criminology, edited by R. Wright. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.
64.
Wolcott, C. 1976. Evaluation system for violent offenders. Sacramento: California Youth Authority, Division of Research.
65.
Yin, Robert. 1986. Case study methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
66.
Zeisel, Hans. 1973. Reflections on experimental techniques in the law. Journal of Legal Studies2 (1): 107-124.
67.
Zimring, Franklin E., and Gordon J. Hawkins. 1973. Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
