ASSESSING THE FOOTBALL WIDOW HYPOTHESIS: A COORIENTATION STUDY OF THE ROLE OF TELEVISED SPORTS IN LONG-STANDING RELATIONSHIPS

Abstract

Using a coorientation perspective, this study examined the extent to which relational partners share behaviors and vantage points with regard to their use of televised sports. It also assessed the role that televised sports programming played in those relationships. Telephone interviews were conducted with 92 pairs of partners residing in two major cities, with the second partner interviewed immediately after the first. Coorientation measures (agreement, accuracy, and congruency) were computed by matching responses across partners. Relational partners appear to share evaluations of the scope and nature of the impact of televised sports in their relationship, although there were differences between partners in the amount of time spent watching their favorite sport on television as well as in their interest in and perceived knowledge of that sport. Televised sports appears to be a minor and nondisruptive activity in most ongoing relationships. Popular opinion to the contrary, the “football widow” syndrome does not appear to be widespread. Nonetheless, discrepancies between spouses related to televised sports seemed to make a difference in evaluations of relational satisfaction.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bochner, A. P. , Krueger, D. L. , & Chmielewski, T. L. (1982). Interpersonal perceptions and marital adjustment. Journal of Communication, 32(3), 135-147.

Buchli, V. , & Pearce, W. B. (1974). Listening behavior in coorientational states. Journal of Communication, 24(3), 62-70.

Chaffee, S. H. (1973). Applying the interpersonal perception model to the real world: An introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 465-468.

Chaffee, S. H. , & McLeod, J. M. (1967, August). Communication as coorientation: Two studies. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism, Boulder, CO.

Chaffee, S. H. , & McLeod, J. M. (1968). Sensitization in panel design: A coorientational experiment. Journalism Quarterly, 45, 661-669.

Chaffee, S. H. , McLeod, J. M. , & Guerrero, J. L. (1969, August). Origins and implications of the coorientational approach in communication research. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism, Berkeley, CA.

Clarke, P. (1973). Teenagers' coorientation and information-seeking about pop music. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 551-566.

Comstock, G. A. , Chaffee, S. H. , Katzman, N. , McCombs, M. E. , & Roberts, D. F. (1978). Television and human behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.

Deal, J. E. , Wampler, K. S. , & Halverson, C. F. (1992). The importance of similarity on the marital relationship. Family Process, 31, 369-382.

10.

Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988). Between husbands and wives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

11.

Frank, R. E. , & Greenberg, M. G. (1980). The public's use of television. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

12.

Frey, J. H. (1983). Survey research by telephone. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

13.

Gantz, W. (1985). Exploring the role of television in married life. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 29, 263-275.

14.

Gantz, W. , & Wenner, L. A. (1991). Men, women, and sports: Audience experiences and effects. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35, 233-243.

15.

Gantz, W. , Wenner, L. A. , Carrico, C. , & Knorr, M. (1995). Televised sports and marital relationships. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12, 306-323.

16.

Grunig, J. E. , & Stamm, K. R. (1973). Communication and coorientation collectivities. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 567-592.

17.

Jeffers, D. W. (1977). Performance expectations as a measure of relative status of news and PR people. Journalism Quarterly, 54(2), 299-306.

18.

Kopenhaver, L. L. , Martinson, D. L. , & Ryan, M. (1984). How public relations practitioners and editors in Florida view each other. Journalism Quarterly, 61(4), 860-865, 884.

19.

Kruger Stegall, S. , & Sanders, K. P. (1986). Coorientation of PR practitioners and news personnel in education news. Journalism Quarterly, 63(2), 341-347, 393.

20.

Lauer, R. H. , Lauer, J. C. , & Kerr, S. T. (1990). The long-term marriage: Perceptions of stability and satisfaction. Journal of Aging and Human Development, 31, 189-195.

21.

Levinger, G. , & Breedlove, J. (1966). Interpersonal attraction and agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 367-372.

22.

McLeod, J. M. (1971, August). Issues and strategies in coorientational research. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism, Columbia, SC.

23.

McLeod, J. M. , & Chaffee, S. H. (1973). Interpersonal approaches to communication research. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 469-499.

24.

National Association of Broadcasters . (1987, September). Who watches television sports? (Information pack). Washington, DC: Author.

25.

O'Keefe, G. J., Jr. (1973). Coorientation variables in family study. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 513-536.

26.

Pearce, W. B. , & Stamm, K. R. (1973). Coorientational states and interpersonal communication. In P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for communication research (pp. 177-203). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

27.

Sillars, A. L. , & Scott, M. D. (1983). Interpersonal perception between intimates. Human Communication Research, 10, 153-176.

28.

Stamm, K. R. , & Pearce, W. B. (1974). Message locus and message content: Two studies in communication behavior and coorientational relations. Communication Research, 1(2), 184-203.

29.

Steeves, H. L. (1984). Developing coorientation measures for small groups. Communication Monographs, 51, 185-192.

30.

Thompson, S. C. , & Kelley, H. H. (1981). Judgments of responsibility for activities in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 469-477.

31.

Tichenor, P. J. , & Wackman, D. B. (1973). Mass media and community public opinion. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4), 593-606.

32.

Turk, J. L. , & Bell, N. W. (1972). Measuring power in families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 34, 215-222.