As global climate injustices worsen, sport has the potential to spur climate action through various connections (e.g., athletes to fans, sports teams to sponsors). However, sport's entanglement with capitalism and colonialism is often ignored. In this article, the authors conducted a critical discourse analysis of 20 episodes from four podcast channels on sport and sustainability. The results show how discourses around “sport as an influencer of climate action” create different understandings and implications of leadership. Some versions of leadership include discourses of upward progress, carbon offsetting, and fighting capitalism with more capitalism. Others involve discourses of contextual degrowth, unlearning dominant worldviews, and supporting grassroots activism. Although these discourses are layered and complex, it is important for sport stakeholders to learn from this dialogue, unsettle their own colonial practices, and pay closer attention to the discourses that constrain what is thinkable, sayable, or desirable when it comes to sport and justice.
AndersonJ.TaksM. (2019). Urban governance of non-mega sport events: A socio-political discourse analysis. In WinandM.AnagnostopoulosC. (Eds.), Research handbook on sports governance (pp. 290–310). Edward Elgar Publishing.
2.
BernicoM.DettloffD. (2019). Podcasting: Pedagogy, and the inheritance of clandestine broadcasts. In FordD. R. (Ed.), Keywords in radical philosophy and education (pp. 301–316). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400467_021
BoldR. (2019). Indigenous perceptions of the end of the world: Creating a cosmopolitics of change. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
5.
BreitbarthT.McCulloughB. P.CollinsA.GerkeA.HeroldD. M. (2023). Environmental matters in sport: Sustainable research in the academy. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2159482
6.
ButlerJ. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
7.
CurtisR. (2014). Foucault beyond Fairclough: From transcendental to immanent critique in organization studies. Organization Studies, 35(12), 1753–1772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614546150
8.
CuryR.KennellyM.HowesM. (2023). Environmental sustainability in sport: A systematic literature review. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23(1), 13–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2126511
9.
DowlingF. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of a local enactment of sport for integration policy: Helping young refugees or self-help for voluntary sports clubs?International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 55(8), 1152–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690219874437
10.
Edwards-SchuthB. (2023). Radical praxis pedagogies: A critical podcast methodology (Publication No. 30250539) [Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University]. ProQuest.
11.
EssaM.ArellanoA.StuartS.ShepsS. (2022). Sport for Indigenous resurgence: Toward a critical settler-colonial reflection. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 57(2), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902211005681
12.
FaircloughN. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.
13.
FerrerI.LorenzettiL.ShawJ. (2020). Podcasting for social justice: Exploring the potential of experiential and transformative teaching and learning through social work podcasts. Social Work Education, 39(7), 849–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1680619
14.
FordeS. D.GilesA. R.NachmanJ.FabianT.GiancarloA.HayhurstL. M.RynneS.HenhawkD. A. (2023). Conceptualizing sport for reconciliation within settler colonial states. Journal of Sport for Development, 11(1), 13–18. https://jsfd.org/2023/04/17/conceptualizing-sport-for-reconciliation-within-settler-colonial-states/
15.
GaffneyC. (2013). Between discourse and reality: The un-sustainability of mega-event planning. Sustainability, 5, 3926–3940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5093926
16.
Gang, A. C., Griffin, R. B., & Pedersen, P. M. (2023). Identifying civic opportunity structures within professional football fan clubs. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 47(5), 433-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/01937235231210264
17.
GiulianottiR. (2021). Greening sport for development and peace: A socio-ecological approach. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 3, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.660743
18.
HardtM.NegriA. (2001). Empire. Harvard University Press.
19.
HenhawkD. (2022). Decolonizing sport for development, social innovation, and social entrepreneurship. In McSweeneyM.SvenssonP. G.HayhurstL. M.SafaiP. (Eds.), Social innovation, entrepreneurship, and sport for development and peace (pp. 31–42). Routledge.
20.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
MallenC.ChardC. (2011). A framework for debating the future of environmental sustainability in the sport academy. Sport Management Review, 14(4), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2010.12.002
23.
MarkmanK. M. (2011). Doing radio, making friends, and having fun: Exploring the motivations of independent audio podcasters. New Media & Society, 14(4), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811420848
24.
McMain, E. M., Gang, A. C., & Jo. E. (under review). ‘Everything we wrap it into’: Examining sport's relationship to climate injustice through critical discourse analysis.
25.
MignoloW. D.WalshC. E. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press.
26.
MillingtonR.GilesA. R.van LuijkN.HayhurstL. M. C. (2022). Sport for sustainability? The extractives industry, sport, and sustainable development. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 46(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723521991413
27.
NichollsS.GilesA. R.SethnaC. (2011). Perpetuating the “lack of evidence” discourse in sport for development: Privileged voices, unheard stories, and subjugated knowledge. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690210378273
28.
RogersD.HerbertM. (2020). Podcasts and urban studies: Notes from the field; sounds from the studio. Urban Policy and Research, 38(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2019.1663726
29.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
30.
SnazaN. (2015). Toward a genealogy of educational humanism. In SnazaN.WeaverJ. A. (Eds.), Posthumanism in educational research (pp. 17–29). Routledge.
31.
SveinsonK.HoeberL.HeffernanC. (2021). Critical discourse analysis as theory, methodology, and analyses in sport management studies. Journal of Sport Management, 35, 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2020-0288
32.
SykesH. (2021). Globalization or coloniality? Delinking from the roving colonialism of sport mega-events. In MacguireJ.ListonK.FalcousM. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of globalization and sport (pp. 133–155). Springer.
33.
ThompsonL.RickettB.DayK. (2018). Feminist relational discourse analysis: Putting the personal in the political in feminist research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 15(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1393586
34.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
35.
TrinhM.-H. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Indiana University Press.
WhitinuiP. (2021). Decolonizing sports sociology is a “verb not a noun”: Indigenizing our way to reconciliation and inclusion in the 21st century? Alan Ingham Memorial Lecture. Sociology of Sport Journal, 38, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2020-0148
