Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Athletes competing in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletics have long been monitored by their respective athletic departments. As technology continues to advance and become more socially pervasive, many NCAA member institutions have issued wearable technology devices to athletes. The present study sought to examine the function of such implementation of wearable technology in collegiate athletics. Findings from interviews with current NCAA athletes reveal the widespread use of wearable technology in collegiate athletics has resulted in the increased surveillance of athletes. Such surveillance was most notably mentioned with regards to athletic performance tracking, invasive sleep tracking, and general location tracking. In addition, participants stated that while implementation of wearable technology within training programs was instrumental in improving performance, such increasing biometric monitoring was detrimental to individual development and occasionally fostered dissension among teammates. Accordingly, this research calls into question the use and function of wearable technology in collegiate athletics.

Keywords

NCAA total institution wearable technology hegemony paternalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnold

J. F.

Sade

R. M.

(2017). Wearable technologies in collegiate sports: The ethics of collecting biometric data from student-athletes. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(1), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1251648

Bourdon

P. C.

Cardinale

Murray

Gastin

Kellmann

Varley

M. C.

Gabbett

T. J.

Coutts

A. J.

Burgess

D. J.

Gregson

Cable

N. T.

(2017). Monitoring athlete training loads: Consensus statement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1123/IJSPP.2017-0208

Bradley

(2017, September 22). Penn State coach James Franklin monitoring players’ sleep with WHOOP. Sport Business Journal. https://www.sporttechie.com/penn-state-football-gets-rested-with-whoop

Brown

S. M.

Brown

K. M.

(2021). Should your wearables be shareable? The ethics of wearable technology in collegiate athletics. Marquette Sports Law Review, 32(1), 97–116.

Byers

Hammer

(1997). Unsportsmanlike conduct: Exploiting college athletes. University of Michigan Press.

Cardinale

Varley

M. C.

(2017). Wearable training-monitoring technology: Applications, challenges, and opportunities. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0423

Caro

C. A.

(2012). College football success: The relationship between recruiting and winning. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 7(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.7.1.139

Comeaux

(2018). Stereotypes, control, hyper-surveillance, and disposability of NCAA division I black male athletes. New Directions for Student Services, 2018(163), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20268

Corr

Southall

Hawkins

Southall

R. M.

(2024). College football “kids”: Infantilizing language in football bowl subdivision bowl game broadcasts. Sociology of Sport Journal, 41(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2022-0185

10.

Corr

Southall

R. M.

(2022). The ESPNification of football bowl subdivision college football: The adoption of an integrated marketing communication televisuality in football bowl subdivision bowl game broadcasts. International Journal of Sport Communication, 15(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2021-0124

11.

Corr

Southall

R. M.

Southall

Hart

R. J.

(2023a). Hyperprofessionalized and commodified: A case study examination of FBS bowl games and the utilization of football players as programmatic promotional material. International Journal of Sport Communication, 16(2), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2022-0200

12.

Corr

Weiner

Stokowski

(2023b). “We do everything on our own”: FBS athletes’ perceptions of NIL value and support. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 16, 334–351.

13.

Creswell

J. W.

Hanson

W. E.

Clark Plano

V. L.

Morales

(2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011000006287390

14.

Dodd

(2014, May 23). Jimbo Fisher’s secret weapon for champ FSU? It comes from Australia. CBS Sports. https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/jimbo-fishers-secret-weapon-for-champ-fsu-it-comes-from-australia/

15.

Dodd

(2022, December 28). Pac-12 plans to consider releasing injury reports, selling data rights to capitalize on sports betting wave. CBS Sports. https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/pac-12-plans-to-consider-releasing-injury-reports-selling-data-rights-to-capitalize-on-sports-betting-wave/

16.

Gettysburg College. (2020, April 15). Gettysburg uses WHOOP for well-being. Gettysburg College. https://gettysburgsports.com/news/2020/4/15/general-gettysburg-uses-whoop-for-well-being.aspx

17.

Goodyear

V. A.

Kerner

Quennerstedt

(2019). Young people’s uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies; surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance. Sport, Education and Society, 24(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1375907

18.

Harry

(2023). Hegemony and the National Collegiate Athletic Association: A critical discourse analysis of National Collegiate Athletic Association resources concerning name, image, and likeness. Sociology of Sport Journal, 41(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2023-0017

19.

Hatteberg

S. J.

(2018). Under surveillance: Collegiate athletics as a total institution. Sociology of Sport Journal, 35(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2017-0096

20.

Hawkins

(2010). The new plantation: Black athletes, college sports, and predominantly white NCAA institutions. Springer.

21.

Holmes

(2020, July 16). Improving collegiate athlete performance: WHOOP on University of Tennessee athletics. WHOOP. https://www.whoop.com/us/en/thelocker/whoop-on-university-of-tennessee-athletics/

22.

James

D. A.

Petrone

(2016). Sensors and wearable technologies in sport: Technologies, trends and approaches for implementation. Springer.

23.

Jessop

Baker

T. A.

III (2019). Big data bust: Evaluating the risks of tracking NCAA athletes’ biometric data. Texas Review of Entertainment and Sports Law, 20(1), 81–112.

24.

Jones

Konoval

Toner

(2022). Sport and surveillance technologies. In Sanderson

(Ed.), Sport, social media, and digital technology: Sociological approaches (Vol. 15, pp. 165–183). Emerald Publishing Limited.

25.

Jones

Marshall

Denison

(2016). Health and well-being implications surrounding the use of wearable GPS devices in professional rugby league: A Foucauldian disciplinary analysis of the normalised use of a common surveillance aid. Performance Enhancement & Health, 5(2), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2016.09.001

26.

Kluch

(2023). Why don’t more college athletes engage in activism? A multilevel analysis of barriers to activism in the hegemonic arena of intercollegiate sport. Sport Management Review, 26(5), 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2023.2175493

27.

Krampe

E. M.

(2009). When is the father really there? A conceptual reformulation of father presence. Journal of Family Issues, 30(7), 875–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08331008

28.

Lemire

(2022, August 16). Penn State athletes will use Whoop Unite to track performance data, health and wellness. Sports Business Journal. https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Daily/Issues/2022/08/16/Technology/penn-state-university-athletic-department-whoop-unite.aspx

29.

Luczak

Burch

Lewis

Chander

Ball

(2020). State-of-the-art review of athletic wearable technology: What 113 strength and conditioning coaches and athletic trainers from the USA said about technology in sports. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 15(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954119885244

30.

Marshall

D. B.

English

D. J.

Stewart

A. J.

(2001). The effect of fathers or father figures on child behavioral problems in families referred to child protective services. Child Maltreatment, 6(4), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559501006004002

31.

Mauthner

N. S.

Doucet

(2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373002

32.

McMahon

J. A.

Penney

(2013). (Self-) surveillance and (self-) regulation: Living by fat numbers within and beyond a sporting culture. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 5(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2012.712998

33.

Meuwissen

A. S.

Englund

M. M.

(2016). Executive function in at-risk children: Importance of father-figure support and mother parenting. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.04.002

34.

National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2022). 2.9 The principle of amateurism. LSDBi. https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/bylaw?bylawId=2470&division=1&adopted=0

35.

New

(2015, June 23). Class checkers. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/06/24/attendance-monitoring-programs-common-college-athletics

36.

Perez

A. J.

(2022, December 29). Why a Pac-12 sports betting data deal may have few takers. Front Office Sports. https://frontofficesports.com/why-a-pac-12-sports-betting-data-deal-may-have-few-takers/

37.

Ringuet-Riot

C. J.

Hahn

James

D. A.

(2013). A structured approach for technology innovation in sport. Sports Technology, 6(3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/19346182.2013.868468

38.

Rohner

R. P.

Veneziano

R. A.

(2001). The importance of father love: History and contemporary evidence. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.382

39.

Seshadri

D. R.

R. T.

Voos

J. E.

Rowbottom

J. R.

Alfes

C. M.

Zorman

C. A.

Drummond

C. K.

(2019). Wearable sensors for monitoring the internal and external workload of the athlete. NPJ Digital Medicine, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0150-9

40.

Shultz

(2017, April 12). Why is this wearable-tech company helping college teams track how often athletes sleep, drink, and have sex? Deadspin. https://deadspin.com/why-is-this-wearable-tech-company-helping-college-teams-1794218363

41.

Smolenski

(2019). When the collection of biometric and performance data on college athletes goes too far. Wake Forest Law Review, 54(1), 279–301.

42.

Snyder

(2018, October 11). Penn State’s quest for 1 percent improvement extends well beyond what’s visible on Saturdays. The Athletic. https://theathletic.com/582281/2018/10/11/james-franklin-penn-state-football-quest-1-percent-improvement/

43.

Southall

R. M.

Nagel

M. S.

Staurowsky

E. J.

Karcher

R. T.

Maxcy

J. G.

(2023). The NCAA and the exploitation of college profit-athletes: An amateurism that never was. University of South Carolina Press.

44.

Southall

R. M.

Weiler

J. D.

(2014). NCAA division-I athletic departments: 21^st century athletic company towns. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 7, 161–186.

45.

Spotter. (2023, September 7). Spotter. Google Play Store. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.spottergps.spotter&hl=en_US&gl=US

46.

Stokowski

Dittmore

S. W.

Stine

(2017). Resource decisions in academic services: Which factors predict positive APR scores at NCAA division I institutions? Journal of Contemporary Athletics, 11(3), 173–188.

47.

Stokowski

Smith

A. B.

Fridley

Corr

Paule-Koba

A. L.

(2023). “The most important shot you will ever take”: The burgeoning role of social media activism in challenging embedded NCAA patriarchy. International Journal of Sport Communication, 16(4), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2023-0159

48.

Studnicka

(2020). The emergence of wearable technology and the legal implications for athletes, teams, leagues and other sports organizations across amateur and professional athletics. DePaul Journal of Sports Law, 16(1), 195–224.

49.

Thompson

C. J.

Locander

W. B.

Pollio

H. R.

(1989). Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: The philosophy and method of existential phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1086/209203

50.

Vannini

(2023, August 25). Big Ten’s new player availability report requirements latest adjustment to rise of legalized sports gambling. The Athletic. https://theathletic.com/4806952/2023/08/25/big-ten-football-player-availability-reports-gambling/?source=user_shared_article

The Modernization of Monitorization: Technological Adaption and Innovation as Mechanisms for College Athlete Surveillance

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References