In this article, the author analyzes the discursive shifts, continuities, and convergences from which Paralympic discourses, practices, subjects, and institutions have emerged. The author utilizes Foucauldian discourse analysis to interpret 14 texts about Paralympic history and to trace how dominant discourses of disability and physical activity have (in)formed Paralympism at four specific stages of its institutionalization. Contrary to popular assumptions about Paralympism’s progressive empowerment of those with disabilities, the author demonstrates how, in each of these historical stages, discourses from rehabilitation, mainstream sport, and the freak show have colluded in ways that serve to perpetuate, justify, and conceal the unequal relationships of power in and through which disability is enacted and experienced.
AllenB. (2005). Foucault’s nominalism. In TremainS. (Ed.), Foucault and the government of disability (pp. 93-107). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
AndersonJ. (2003). “Turned into taxpayers”: Paraplegia rehabilitation and sport at Stoke Mandeville, 1944-56. Journal of Contemporary History, 38, 461-475.
3.
AndersonN. A. (2003). Discursive analytical strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
4.
Ashton-ShaefferC.GibsonH.HoltM.WillimingC. (2001). Women’s resistance and empowerment through wheelchair sport. World Leisure & Recreation, 43(4), 11-21.
5.
BaileyS. (2008). Athlete first: A history of the Paralympic Movement. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
6.
BergerR. J. (2009). Hoop dreams on wheels: Disability and the competitive wheelchair athlete. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BogdanR. (1988). Freak show: Presenting human oddities for amusement and profit. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BrittainI. (2004). Perceptions of disability and their impact upon involvement in sport for people with disabilities at all levels. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 28, 429-452.
9.
BrittainI. (2010). The Paralympic Games explained. London: Routledge.
10.
CampbellF. K. (2005). Legislating disability: Negative ontologies and the government of legal identities. In TremainS. (Ed.), Foucault and the government of disability (pp. 108-130). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11.
ClareE. (1999). Exile & pride: Disability, queerness, and liberation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
12.
DavisL. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. New York, NY: Verso.
13.
DavisL. J. (2002). Bending over backwards: Disability, dismodernism, and other difficult positions. New York, NY: New York University Press
14.
DennetA. S. (1996). The dime museum freak show reconfigured as talk show. In ThomsonR. G. (Ed.), Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body (pp. 315-326). New York, NY: New York University Press.
15.
DePauwK. P. (2001). The Paralympic Movement: Past, present, and future. Journal of the International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport & Dance, 37(2), 42-47.
16.
DePauwK. P.GavronS. J. (1995). Disability and sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
17.
Diaz-BoneR.BührmannA. D.Gutiérrez RodríguezE.SchneiderW.KendallG.TiradoF. (2007). The field of Foucaultian discourse analysis: Structures, developments and perspectives. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2), 1-21.
18.
Doll-TepperG. (1999). Disability sport. In RiordanJ.KrugerA. (Eds.), International politics of sport in the 20th century (pp. 171-190). New York, NY: Spon Press.
19.
FoucaultM. (1972). The Archaeology of knowledge [’archéologie du savoir] (SheridonA., Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.
20.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality. New York, NY: Pantheon.
21.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison [Surveiller et punir.] (SheridonA., Trans., 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Vintage.
22.
FoucaultM. (2003a). The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom. In FoucaultM.RabinowP.RoseN. S. (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 351-369). New York, NY: New Press.
23.
FoucaultM. (2003b). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In FoucaultM.RabinowP.RoseN. S. (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 102-125). New York, NY: New Press.
24.
FoucaultM. (2003c). The subject and power. In FoucaultM.RabinowP.RoseN. S. (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 126-144). New York, NY: New Press.
25.
FoucaultM. (2003d). What is enlightenment? In FoucaultM.RabinowP.RoseN. S. (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 351-369). New York, NY: New Press.
26.
FoucaultM.FontanaA.PasquinoP. (1992). Truth and power. In AdamsH. (Ed.), Critical theory since Plato (Rev. ed., pp. 1134-1145). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27.
FrancisL. P. (2005). Competitive sports, disability, and problems of justice in sports. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 32, 127-132.
28.
GoldJ. R.GoldM. M. (2007). The Paralympic games. In GoldJ. R.GoldM. M. (Eds.), Olympic cities: City agendas, planning and the world’s games, 1896-2012 (pp.108-129). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
GoodmanS. (1986). Spirit of Stoke Mandeville: The story of Ludwig Guttmann. London: Collins.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (2003). Analyzing interpretive practice. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 478-509). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
HardinM. (2007). “I consider myself an empowered woman”: The interaction of sport, gender and disability in the lives of wheelchair basketball players. Women in Sport & Physical Activity Journal, 16(1), 39-52.
33.
HoweP. D. (2008). The cultural politics of the Paralympic Movement: Through an anthropological lens. London: Routledge.
34.
HoweP. D.JonesC. (2006). Classification of disabled athletes: (Dis)empowering the Paralympic practice community. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23, 29-46.
35.
HuangC.BrittainI. (2006). Negotiating identities through disability sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23, 352-375.
36.
JonesC.HoweP. D. (2005). The conceptual boundaries of sport for the disabled: Classification and athletic performance. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 32, 133-146.
37.
KendallG.WickhamG. (1999). Using Foucault’s methods. London: SAGE.
38.
LabanowichS. (1989). The Paralympic Games: A retrospective view. Palaestra, 5(4), 9-14, 48-52.
39.
LeggD.EmesC.StewartD.SteadwardR. (2004). Historical overview of the Paralympics, Special Olympics, and Deaflympics. Palaestra, 20(1), 30-35, 56.
40.
MarkulaP.PringleR. (2006). Foucault, sport and exercise: Power, knowledge and transforming the self. New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
McRobbieA. (2005). The uses of cultural studies: A textbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
MeadmoreD.HatcherC.McWilliamE. (2000). Getting tense about genealogy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 13, 463-476.
43.
PageS. J.O’ConnorE.PetersonK. (2001). Leaving the disability Ghetto: A qualitative study of factors underlying achievement motivation among athletes with disabilities. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 25, 40-55.
ReidG. (2003). Defining adapted physical activity. In SteadwardR. D.WheelerG. D.WatkinsonE. J. (Eds.), Adapted physical activity (pp. 11-25). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta Press.
46.
RothfelsN. (1996). Aztecs, Aborigines, and ape-people: Science and freaks in Germany, 1850-1900. In ThomsonR. G. (Ed.), Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body (pp. 158-172). New York, NY: New York University Press.
47.
SchantzO. J.GilbertK. (2001). An ideal misconstrued: Newspaper coverage of the Atlanta Paralympic Games in France and Germany. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18, 69-94.
48.
SchellL. A.DuncanM. C. (1999). A content analysis of CBS’s coverage of the 1996 Paralympic Games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 27-47.
49.
SchellL. A.RodriguezS. (2001). Subverting bodies/ambivalent representation: Media analysis of Paralympian, Hope Lewellen. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18, 127-135.
50.
ScheurichJ. J. (1997). Research method in the postmodern. Washington, DC: Falmer.
51.
ScrutonJ. (1998). Stoke Mandeville: Road to the Paralympics. Aylesbury, UK: Peterhouse Press.
52.
ShildrickM.PriceJ. (1996). Breaking the boundaries of the broken body. Body & Society, 2, 93-113.
53.
ShoganD. (1998). The social construction of disability: The impact of statistics and technology. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 269-277.
54.
SmithA.ThomasN. (2005). The “inclusion” of elite athletes with disabilities in the 2002 Manchester Commonwealth Games: An exploratory analysis of British newspaper coverage. Sport, Education & Society, 10, 49-67.
55.
SnyderS. L.MitchellD. T. (2006). Cultural locations of disability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
SteadwardR.FosterS. L. (2003). History of disability sport: From rehabilitation to athletic excellence. In SteadwardR. D.WatkinsonE. J.WheelerG. D. (Eds.), Adapted physical activity (pp. 471-496). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta Press.
57.
SteadwardR. D.PetersonC. J. (1997). Paralympics: Where heroes come. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: One Shot Holdings.
58.
StoneE. (2001). Disability, sport, and the body in China. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18, 51-68.
59.
SullivanM. (2005). Subjected bodies: Paraplegia, rehabilitation, and the politics of movement. In TremainS. (Ed.), Foucault and the government of disability (pp. 27-44). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
60.
ThomasC.CorkerM. (2002). A journey around the social model. In CorkerM.ShakespeareT. (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 18-31). New York, NY: Continuum.
61.
ThomasN.SmithA. (2003). Preoccupied with able-bodiedness? An analysis of the British media coverage of the 2000 Paralympic Games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 166-181.
62.
ThomsonR. G. (1996). From wonder to error: A genealogy of freak discourse in modernity. In ThomsonR. G. (Ed.), Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body (pp. 1-22). New York, NY: New York University Press.
63.
ThomsonR. G. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
64.
TiradoF.GálvezA. (2007). Positioning theory and discourse analysis: Some tools for social interaction analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2), 1-20.
65.
TitchkoskyT. (2007). Reading and writing disability differently: The textured life of embodiment. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
66.
TremainS. (2002). On the subject of impairment. In CorkerM.ShakespeareT. (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 32-47). New York, NY: Continuum.
67.
TremainS. (2005). Foucault, governmentality, and critical disability theory: An introduction. In TremainS. (Ed.), Foucault and the government of disability (pp. 1-24). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
68.
TremainS. (2006). On the government of disability. In DavisL. J. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 185-196). New York, NY: Routledge.
