This article empirically investigates media coverage of 23 publicly financed stadium projects in 16 U.S. cities. Typically, media coverage uncritically supports these initiatives but, occasionally, it offers a far more critical view. In addition, the media in many cities take a “hybrid” approach, which is neither completely critical nor uncritical of these projects. The authors contend that media approaches matter a great deal in helping or hindering a stadium initiative. However, this impact is highly dependent on the unity and strength of the city's local growth coalition, which usually develops and champions these projects. A relatively critical media can seriously impede a stadium project, but only when the local growth coalition is weak or fragmented. Conversely, an uncritical media often becomes the primary institutional booster of stadium projects in cities with a weak growth coalition.
Bagli, C. (2001, May 14). Support for development but maybe not a stadium. The New York Times, p. B1.
2.
Bagli, C. (2004a, March 2). Javits Center expansion overshadowed by stadium debate. The New York Times, p. B1.
3.
Bagli, C. (2004b, June 20). Big claims and questions surround plan for a stadium. The New York Times, p. A29.
4.
Bagli, C. (2004c, July 20). City report differs with Jets on gains from stadium. The New York Times, p. B3.
5.
Bennett, W.L. (2006). News: The politics of illusion (7th ed.). New York: Longman.
6.
Carroll, K. (2007, March). Sports and the media. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society, Philadelphia.
7.
Davies, J. (2002). Urban regime theory: A normative-empirical critique . Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 1-17.
8.
Delaney, K., & Eckstein, R. (2003a). Public dollars, private stadiums. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9.
Delaney, K., & Eckstein, R. (2003b). The devil is in the details: Neutralizing critical studies of publicly subsidized stadiums. Critical Sociology , 29, 189-210.
10.
Delaney, K., & Eckstein, R. (2007). Urban power structures and publicly financed stadiums . Sociological Forum, 22(3), 331-353.
11.
Eckstein, R. (2007, March). The alleged social importance of sports . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society, Philadelphia.
12.
Eckstein, R., & Delaney, K. (2002). New sports stadiums, community self esteem, and community collective conscience. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 26, 235-247.
13.
Euchner, C. (1993). Playing the field: Why sports teams move and cities fight to keep them. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Euchner, C., & McGovern, S. (2003). Urban policy reconsidered: dialogues on the problems and prospects of American cities. New York: Routledge.
15.
Gans, H.J. (2003). Democracy and the news. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Gottdiener, M., Collins, C., & Dickens, D. (1999). Las Vegas: The social construction of an All-American city. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
17.
Graber, D. (Ed.). (2006). Media power in politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
18.
Greenberg, J. (2004). Promotional communication and reflexivity: Case studies in media politics and problematization of neo-liberalism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
19.
It's a deal that will pay off for the city. (2005, September 9). Indianapolis Star, p. A10.
20.
Jonas, E. G., & Wilson, D. (Eds.). (1999). The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives two decades later. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
21.
King, R., Staurowsky, E., Baca, L., Davis, L., and Pewewardy, C. (2002). Of polls and race prejudice: Sports Illustrated's errant “Indian Wars.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 26(4), 381-402.
22.
Klinenberg, E. (2007). Fighting for air: The battle to control America's media. New York: Metropolitan Books .
23.
Lauria, M. (1997). Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulating urban politics in a global economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24.
Let's not overlook the convention center. (2005, March 9). Indianapolis Star, p. A12.
25.
Logan, J., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press.
26.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London : Macmillan.
27.
Maher, T. (2005, October). Power in cities: Who has it, who doesn't, and how globalization is changing the equation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Sociological Society , New Orleans, LA.
28.
McNeil, M. (2005a, September 9). State OKs deal with city and Colts . Indianapolis Star, p. B1.
29.
McNeil, M. (2005b, September 27). New Stadium: What's in it for the Fans?Indianapolis Star, p. A1.
30.
Meier, H. (2004). Commercialization and market constitution: On the political construction of the market for sports broadcasting rights. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft,52(4), 583-612.
31.
Miller, T., Lawrence, G., McKay, J., and Rowe, D. (1999). Playing the world. Peace Review,11(4), 495-498.
32.
Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309-330.
33.
New York's Olympic bid. (2004, May 19). The New York Times, p. A24.
34.
Posnanski, J. (2005, December 23). Simply put: You pay and they stay. Kansas CityStar, p. D1.
35.
Schiller, H. (1991). Not yet the post-imperialist era. Critical Studies in Mass Communications, 8(1), 13-28.
36.
Smith, D. (2005, October 12). Offensive renewed for urban ballpark. Kansas CityStar, p. A1.
37.
Smith, D. (2006, January 21). Rolling roof a hit with the Royals. Kansas CityStar, p. B1.
38.
Steinhauer, J. (2004, June 4). On one side, cheerleading; the other, `Block that stadium.' The New York Times, p. B1
39.
Tully, M., & Fritze, J. (2004, December 14). Study: Stadium boon is $30 million a year. Indianapolis Star, p. A1.
