At the turn of the millennium, gender relations are in a state of flux. Increasingly, separate gendered spheres and roles are being challenged and negotiated in many areas of social life. At the same time, many gendered ideologies are also reproduced, continuing longstanding inequities. Recreational sporting subworlds provide a context to explore how gendered rule structures contribute to and redress such inequities. Coed softball provides an example of a sport in which equal participation by gender is a legislated goal. However, such rules must be critically evaluated. Given the history of gender inequity in sports, one must ask how, through the rules and their enforcement, is gender equality conceptualized by participants, umpires, and rule makers? Through participant observation and analysis of the text of the rules, this article explores the providing of equality by defining and legislating difference that simultaneously challenges and reifies gender difference and ultimately gender inequity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cahn, S.
(1994). Coming on strong: Gender and sexuality in twentieth-century women’s sport. New York: Free Press.
2.
Connell, R. W.
(1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
Connell, R. W.
(1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Cross, G.
(1990). A social history of leisure since 1600. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
5.
Crosset, T.
(1990). Masculinity, sexuality, and the development of early modern sport. In M. Messner & D. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
6.
Crosset, T.
, & Beal, B. (1997). The use of “subculture” and “subworld” in ethnographic works on sport: A discussion of definitional distinctions. Sociology of Sport Journal, 14, 73-85.
7.
Dunning, E.
(1986). Sport as a male preserve: Notes on the social sources of masculine identity and it’s transformations. In N. Elias & E. Dunning (Eds.), Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilizing process. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
8.
Foucault, M.
(1979). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
9.
Garnsey, E.
, & Rees, B. (1996). Discourse and enactment: Gender inequality in text and context. Human Relations, 49, 1041-1064
10.
Gorn, E. J.
, & Goldstein, W. (1993). A brief history of American sports. New York: Hill & Wang.
11.
Grant, J.
(1993). Fundamental feminism: Contesting the core concepts of feminist theory. New York: Routledge.
12.
Hargreaves, J.
(1994). Sporting females: Critical issues in the history and sociology of women’s sports. New York: Routledge.
13.
Heywood, L.
, & Drake, J. (1997). Third wave agenda. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Hult, J. S.
(1994). The story of women’s athletics: Manipulating a dream 1890-1985. In S. Costa & S. Guthrie (Eds.), Women and sport: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
15.
Kane, M. J.
(1995). Resistance/transformation of the oppositional binary: Exposing sport as a continuum. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 19, 191-218.
16.
Kessler, S. J.
(1994). The medical construction of gender: Case management of intersexed infants. In A. Herrmann & A. Stewart (Eds.), Theorizing feminism: Parallel trends in the humanities and social sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Kessler, S. J.
, & McKenna, W. (1974). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: John Wiley.
18.
Kessler-Harris, A.
(1990). A woman’s wage: Symbolic meanings and social consequences. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
19.
Kimmel, M. S.
(1990). Baseball and the reconstitution of American masculinity. In M. Messner & D. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
20.
Lorber, J.
(1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
McKay, J.
(1997). Managing gender: Affirmative action and organizational power in Australian, Canadian, and New Zealand sport. New York: State University of New York.
22.
Messner, M.
(1990). When bodies are weapons: Masculinity and violence in sport. International Review for Sociology of Sport, 25, 3.
23.
Rubin, L. B.
(1994). Families on the faultline. New York: Harper Perennial.
24.
Scott, J.
(1996). Only paradoxes to offer. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Harvard University Press.
25.
Sennett, R.
(1994). Flesh and stone: The body and the city in western civilization. New York: W. W. Norton.
26.
Smith, J.
(1987). Men and women at play: Gender, life-cycle and leisure. In J. Horne, D. Jary, & A. Tomlinson (Eds.), Sport, leisure and social relations. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
27.
Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation
. (1998). Fast and slow pitch softball rules. Los Angeles: County of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks.
28.
Vertinsky, P.
(1994). Women, sport, and exercise in the 19th century. In V. Costa & S. Guthrie (Eds.), Women and sport: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
29.
Wachs, F. L.
(in press). ”I was there”: Gender, power and discourse in the world of coed softball. In A. Bolin & J. Granskog (Eds.), Bodies in motion: Women, culture, and exercise/sport. New York: State University of New York Press.
30.
Wachs, F. L.
(2002). “Getting lucky”: Why women can’t win for losing in coed environments such as softball. Manuscript submitted for publication.
