The challenge of implementing the study of technology as a core subject will require
bold leadership by educators and school administrators at all levels. Teachers and
administrators must work together to include the study of technology. This knowledge
will empower students to deal with the many technological issues and problems that
will confront them in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Benchmarks for science literacy: Project
2061. New York:
Oxford.
2.
American heritage dictionary of the English language.
1975. Boston: American
Heritage & Houghton Mifflin.
3.
Bowden, G. T.1982. Becoming a scientifically literate
nation. Educational Record4: 5-8.
4.
Boyer, E. L.1983. High school: A report on secondary education in
America. New York: Harper
& Row.
5.
Branscomb, A. W.1981. Knowing how to know.
Science, Technology & Human Values36: 5-9.
6.
Brungs, R.February 1987. Literacy: A common
need. Paper presented at the meeting of the National
Science, Technology, Society Conference: Technological Literacy,
Washington, DC.
7.
Bugliarello, G.1982. Technology. New
York: Polytechnic Institute
Press.
8.
Bybee, R. W.1986. The Sisyphean question in science education: What
should the scientifically and technologically literate person know, value, and
do-as a citizen? In Science-technology-society NSTA
yearbook, edited by R. W. Bybee. Washington, D.C.: National
Science Teachers Association.
9.
Cutcliffe, S. H.1985. Understanding science, technology and engineering:
An essential element of cultural literacy. Federation
Review4: 10-15.
10.
DeVore, P. W.1987. Science and technology: An analysis of
meaning. The Journal of Epsilon Pi Tau1: 2-9.
11.
DeVore, P. W.1980. Technology: An introduction.
Worcester, Mass.:
Davis.
12.
Ellul, J.1964. The technological society, trans. J. Wilkinson.
New York: Alfred A.
Knopf.
13.
Ferkiss, V.1969. Technological man: The myth and the reality.
New York: George
Braziller.
14.
Friedman, E. A.1980. Dimensions of technological literacy in liberal
education. Forum for Liberal Education3: 1-16.
15.
Gies, J. C.1982. Technology: A new liberal art?AGB Reports1: 17-20.
16.
Hellman, H.1976. Technophobia. New
York: M. Evans.
17.
Hersh, R. H. (1983a). Education and the corporate
connection. Education Horizons1: 5-8.
18.
Hersh, R. H.1983b. How to avoid becoming a nation of
technopeasants. Phi Delta Kappan9: 635-638.
19.
Hurd, P. D.1984. Reforming science education: The search for a new
vision. Washington, D.C.:
Council for Basic Education (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. Ed 242 515).
20.
Layton, E.1971. Mirror-image twins: The communities of science and
technology in 19th-century America. Technology and
Culture4: 562-580.
21.
Mendlovitz, S. H., ed. 1975. On the creation of a just world order:
Preferred worlds for the 1990s. New York:
Free Press.
22.
Mesthene, E. G.1970. Technological change: Its impact on man and
society. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
23.
Miller, J. B.February 1987. THX-1 138 and the star
thrower. Paper presented at the meeting of the National
Science, Technology, Society Conference: Technological Literacy,
Washington, D.C.
24.
Naisbitt, J.1982. Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our
lives. New York:
Warner.
25.
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). 1994. Conditions of education: Introduction to section
B: Achievement, attainment, and curriculum. [On-line]. Available: www.ed.gov/pubs/stats.html.
26.
Press, F.1978. The agenda to technology and
policy. Technology Review3: 51-55.
27.
Ramo, S.1983. What's wrong with our technological society-And how to fix
it. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
28.
Saxon, D. S.1983. The place of science and technology in the liberal
arts curriculum: Conference on science and technology education for civic and
professional life-The undergraduate years. American
Journal of Physics1: 12-15.
29.
Shamos, M. H.1982. Science for everyone?New York University Education Quarterly4: 2-10.
30.
Snow, C. P.1959. The two cultures and the scientific revolution.
New York: Cambridge University
Press.
31.
Suzuki, D.1984. Science communication-Too little signal too much
noise. Science Dimension2: 30-30.
32.
Task Force on Education for Economic Growth. 1983. Action for excellence: A comprehensive plan to
improve our nation's schools. Washington,
D.C.: Education Commission of the
States.
33.
Technology for all Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of
technology. 1996. Reston,
Va.: International Technology Education
Association.
34.
Toffler, A.1970. Future shock. New
York: Bantam.
35.
Weaver, G. R.February 1987. Technology studies in a liberal
arts context. Paper presented at the meeting of the
National Science, Technology, Society conference: Technological
Literacy, Washington, D.C.
36.
Winner, L.1977. Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme
in political thought. Cambridge, Mass.:
MIT Press.
37.
Wright, T. R.; Israel, E. N.; and Lauda, D. P.1993. Teaching technology: A teacher's guide.
Reston, Va.: International
Technology Education Association.
