"Leave art in the primary grades where all it takes is a box of crayons to support the program." How often are educators frustrated with the public's view and lack of support for secondary art education? If art programs are to survive in what is often a hostile environment, careful program and public relations strategies must be employed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armstrong, D.G. "Team Teaching and Academic Achievement." Review of Educational Research1(1977): 65-86.
2.
Cooper, D.H. "Team Teaching: Student Adjustment and Achievement." The Journal of Educational Research7( 1973): 323-27.
3.
Davis, J.Interdisciplinary Courses and Team Teaching. Phoenix, Ariz. : Oryx Press, 1995.
4.
Erickson, H.Stirring the Head, Heart, and Soul. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Corwin Press, 1995.
5.
Gamsky, N.R. "Team Teaching, Student Achievement, and Attitudes." The Journal of Experimental Education1( 1970): 42-46.
6.
Garner, H. Teamwork Models and Experiences inEducation. Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn & Bacon, 1995.
7.
Impson, P.D.; Lyman, J.M.; and Reiter, R.L. "Interdisciplinary Education— You Bet It Can Work!" NASSP Bulletin, March 1995.
8.
Koehler, V.Educators' Handbook: A Research Perspective. New York: Longman, 1987.
9.
Kroto, J.J. "Bridging the Gap." The Science Teacher8(1988): 28-29.
10.
Maeroff, G.Team Building for School Change. New York: Teachers College Press, 1993.
11.
MacIver, D. J. "Meeting the Needs of Young Adolescents. Advisory Groups, Interdisciplinary Teaching Teams, and School Transition Programs." Phi Delta Kappan6(1990): 458-64.
12.
Saphier, J., and Gower, R.The Skillful Teacher: Building Your Teaching Skills. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, 1987.
13.
Willerman, M.; McNeely, S.L.; and Koffman, E.C.Teachers Helping Teachers: Peer Observation and Assistance. New York, Praeger, 1991.
