As changes occur in the administration of special education programs in response to increased team-based program Leadership and manage ment, and shared administrative responsibility for special education programs, revisions in the performance appraisal of special education administrators must be considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bolton, D.L.Evaluating Administrative Personnel in School Systems. New York: Teachers College Press, 1980.
2.
Herman, Jerry J. "Administrator Supervision, Evaluation, and Performance Pay." NASSP Bulletin, May 1993.
3.
—. "Evaluating the Performance of Administrators: The Process and the Tools." NASSP Bulletin, December 1991.
4.
Langlois, D.E., and McAdams, R.P.Performance Appraisal of School Management: Evaluating the Administrative Team. Lancaster, Pa.: Technomic Publishing Co., 1992.
5.
Lashley, C.A.Position Responsibilities and Relationships in the Evaluation of District Level Special Education Administrators. CASE Information Dissemination Packet , 1991.
6.
Leithwood, K.A. "The Move Toward Transformational Leadership." Educational Leadership5(1992): 5-12.
Osborne, A.G.; DiMattia, P.; and Curran, F.X.Effective Management of Special Education Programs: A Handbook for School Administrators. New York: Teachers College Press, 1993.
9.
Rammer, R.A. "How the Literature on Administration Evaluation Relates to Actual Practice." NASSP Bulletin, December 1991.
10.
Sage, D.D., and Burrello, L.C.Leadership in Educational Reform: An Administrator's Guide to Change in Special Education. Baltimore, Md.: Paul H. Brookes Publishing, 1994.
11.
St. John, W. D. "Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Includes Evaluation of Administrative Team." NASSP Bulletin, December 1991.
12.
Weller, L.D.; Buttery, T.J.; and Bland, R.W. "Teachers Evaluating Principals: As Viewed by Teachers, Principals, and Superintendents." Journal of Research and Development of Evaluation2(1994): 112-117.
