In spite of significant staff development in technology, implementation is difficult. Even when hardware and software are accessible, teachers must be skilled in the use of technology and in its application to the instructional program. Staff development that responds to teachers' concerns and provides follow-up support will increase the likelihood of implementation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barr, S. "Clinton Announces Grants to Schools." The News &Observer, February 19, 1997, p. A6.
2.
Cohen, T. "Cary Academy Developing a Model for Plugging into Technology." The News &Observer, February 9, 1997, p. F3.
3.
Fullan, M.G., and Stiegelbauer, S.The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press, 1991.
4.
Hord, S.M.; Rutherford, W.L.; Huling-Austin, L.; and Hall, G.E.Taking Charge of Change. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1987.
5.
Meltzer, J., and Sherman, T.M. "Ten Commandments for Successful Technology Implementation and Staff Development." NASSP Bulletin, January 1997 .
6.
Murphy, M., and Miller, A. "Incentives Pay Off in Technological Literacy." Educational Leadership, March 1996.
7.
NationalStaff Development Council. Standards for Staff Development. Oxford, Ohio : National Staff Development Council, 1995.
8.
Joyce, B., and Showers, B. StudentAchievement Through Staff Development. White Plains, N.Y.: Longman Press, 1988.
