As high schools across the nation seek to improve delivery of instruc tion, increasing numbers are turning to block scheduling. Many ques tions face school communities that are trying to decide whether or not to move to block scheduling. This article seeks to answer questions about block scheduling by discussing current knowledge and by report ing the results of a study conducted at a small rural high school.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bateson, D.J. "Science Achievement in Semester and All-Year Courses." Journal of Research in Science Teaching3( 1990): 233-40.
2.
Brophy, B. "Semestering and the Teaching-Learning Situation." Canadian Journal of Education3( 1978): 47-54.
3.
Buckman, D.C.; King, B.B., and Ryan, S. "Block Scheduling: A Means To Improve School Climate." NASSP Bulletin, May 1995.
4.
Canady, R.L., and Rettig, M.D. "The Power of Innovative Scheduling." Educational Leadership3(1995).
5.
Carroll, J.M.The Copernican Plan Evaluated: The Evolution of a Revolution. Topsfield, Mass.: Copernican Associates , 1994.
6.
Cawelti, G. HighSchool Restructuring: A National Study. Arlington, Va. : Educational Research Service, 1994.
7.
Davis, J.E.; Ross, J.A.; Ducharme, D.J.; and French, W.The Impact of Semestering on Selected Secondary Schools in Ontario. Toronto: OntarioMinistry of Education, 1977.
8.
Edwards, C.M., Jr. "Virginia's 4 x 4 high schools: High School, College, and More." NASSP Bulletin, May 1995.
9.
Gleadow, N.The Semester System in Vancouver Schools and Its Effects on Curriculum . Vancouver Board of School Trustees, 1975.
10.
Hart, K. "The Intensive Scheduling Model at a Suburban Public High School: Student and Teacher Behavior Changes." Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1994.
11.
Hottenstein, D., and Malatesta, C. "Putting a School in Gear with Intensive Scheduling. The High School Magazine2(1993 ): 28-29.
12.
Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, Minn.: Interaction Book Co., 1989 .
13.
Lockwood, S.L. "Semesterizing the High School Schedule: The Impact on Student Achievement in Algebra and Geometry." NASSP Bulletin, December 1995.
14.
Moodie, A.G.An Evaluation of Semestering in Vancouver Secondary Schools. Vancouver Board of School Trustees, 1971.
15.
Munroe, M.J. "Block: Successful Alternative Format Addressing Learner Needs." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, St. Louis, Mo., February 1989.
16.
O'Neil, J. "Finding Time To Learn." Educational Leadership3(1995).
17.
Prisoners of Time. Washington, D.C.: National Education Commission on Time and Learning, 1994.
18.
Raphael, D.; Wahlstrom, M.W.; and McLean, L.D. "Debunking the Semestering Myth."Canadian Journal of Education1(1986): 36-52.
19.
Reid, L. "Perceived Effects of Block Scheduling on the Teaching of English." ERIC Document No. ED 382950, 1995.
20.
Ross, J. "An Evaluation of Timetable Innovation in Ontario." Canadian Journal of Education1( 1977): 23-36.
21.
Schoenstein, R. From the Roy J. Wasson High School, Colorado Springs, Colo., Web site: URL http://k12.oit.umass.edu/block/Before-After.Stats.txt.
22.
Slavin, R.E.; Karweit, N.L.; and Madden, N.A.Effective Programsfor Students at Risk. Boston : Allyn & Bacon, 1989.
23.
Sprumont, B. "An Evaluation of Timetable Innovation in Ontario." Canadian Journal of Education1( 1979): 23-36.
24.
Stevens, R.S.Semestering in Vancouver Schools. Vancouver Board of School Trustees, 1976.
25.
Traverso, H. P., ed. Scheduling: From Micro to Macro. Reston, Va.: NASSP, 1991.
26.
Whitla, D.K.; Bempechat, J.; Perrone, V.; and Carroll, B.B.The Masconomet Regional High School Renaissance Program: The First Implementation of the Copernican Plan. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard Evaluation Team, 1992 .
