There are many reasons for adopting a block schedule. Research indi cates that block scheduling may have important non-academic advan tages, including a calmer school atmosphere, better discipline, and improved student attitudes. Intensive block schedules may be particu larly helpful to at-risk students, reducing both failure and dropout rates. But how does it affect the teaching of mathematics?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alam, D., and Seick, R.E., Jr. "A Block Schedule with a Twist." Phi Delta Kappan9(1994): 732-33.
2.
Anderson, John O.; Muir, Walter; Bateson, David J.; and Blackmore, David.The Impact of Provincial Examinations on Education in British Columbia: General Report. Victoria, B.C.: British ColumbiaDepartment of Education, 1990. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 325 516)
3.
Averett, Chris P. BlockScheduling in North Carolina High Schools. Raleigh, N.C. : North CarolinaDepartment of Public Instruction, 1994.
4.
Bateson, D.J. "Science Achievement in Semester and All-Year Courses." Journal of Research in Science Teaching3( 1990): 233-40.
5.
Brophy, B. "Semestering and the Teaching-Learning Situation." Canadian Journal of Education3( 1978): 47-54.
6.
Canady, R.L., and Rettig, M. D. BlockScheduling: A Catalyst for Change in High Schools . Princeton, N.J.: Eye on Education , 1995.
7.
Cameron, T. "Block Scheduling One Year Later, or, What's Your Schedule Done for You Lately!" Oklahoma Association of Secondary School PrincipalsNewsletter, October 1995.
8.
Carroll, J.M.The Copernican Plan Evaluated: The Evolution of a Revolution. Topsfield, Mass.: Copernican Associates , 1994a.
9.
—. "The Copernican Plan Evaluated: The Evolution of a Revolution." Phi Delta Kappan2(1994 b): 105-13.
10.
Cox, L.C. "A Study of the Effects of a Block Scheduling Program with High School Students Who Are 'At Risk'." Dissertation Abstracts International10(1995): p. 3,137. (University Microfilms No. AAC 00507551)
11.
Edwards, C.M. "The 4 x 4 Plan." Educational Leadership3(1995): 16-19.
12.
Evans, Charles. L.Initial Assessment of the Intensified Learning Plan. Fort Worth, Tex.: Fort Worth Independent School District, 1971. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 057 083)
13.
—. Trimester Assessment II: 1971-72. Fort Worth, Tex. : Fort Worth Independent School District, 1972. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 083 262)
14.
Gore, Gordon R. "Provincial Exam Results and Timetables." Kamploops, B.C.: 1996.
15.
Governor Thomas Johnson High School.Three Year Summary Report 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95: Four-Period Day. Frederick County, Md.: Author, 1995 .
Hatboro-Horsham Senior High School. "Intensive Scheduling—Year 4: An Evaluation of Extended Time Blocks" Horsham, Pa.: Author, 1995.
18.
Harter, Randy. "The Pros and Cons of Alternative High School Schedules." In Block Scheduling in North Carolina High Schools, edited by Chris P. Everett.Raleigh, N.C.: North CarolinaDepartment of Public Instruction. (Reprinted from Western Region News, NCCTM CEIVTROID, Spring 1994.)
19.
Hedges, Larry V., and Stock, William. "The Effects of Class Size: An Examination of Rival Hypotheses." American Educational Research journal6( 1983): 63-85.
20.
Hottenstein, D., and Malatesta, C. "Putting a School in Gear with Intensive Scheduling." High School Magazine2(1993): 23-29.
21.
Hillcrest High School. "The Hillcrest Plan: A Modified Block Schedule That Puts Kids First—Year Four." Springfield, Mo.: Author, 1995.
22.
Howard High School. "Four Period Block Schedule Semestered Model 1993-1994." Howard County, Md.: Author, 1994.
23.
Hundley, William W. "A Comparative Study of the Classroom Environments of Traditional and Block Scheduled Classes." Doctoral dissertation, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, Wash.1996.
24.
International Association for the Evaluation of Education Achievement (IEA).The Underachieving Curriculum: Assessing U.S. School Mathematics from an International Perspective, A National Report on the Second International Mathematics Study. Champaign, Ill.: Stipes Publishing Co., 1987.
25.
King, A.J.C.; Clements, J.L.; Enns., J.G.; Lockerbie, J.W.; and Warren, W.K.Semestering the Secondary School. Toronto, Ontario : Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1975.
26.
King, A.J.C.; Warren, W.; Moore, J.; Bryans, G.; and Pirie, J.Approaches to Semestering. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1978.
27.
Lockwood, Susan L. "Semesterizing the High School Schedule: The Impact on Student Achievement in Algebra and Geometry in Dothan City Schools." Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, 1995.
28.
Marshall, M.; Taylor, A.; Bateson, D.; and Brigden, S. "The British Columbia Assessment of Mathematics and Science: Preliminary Report (Draft)." Victoria, B.C.: British Columbia Ministry of Education, 1995.
29.
Meadows, Martha E. "A Preliminary Program Review of the Four-Period Day as Implemented in Four High Schools." Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, 1995.
30.
Muruyama, G.; Freeman, C.; Hole, D.; Frederickson, J.; and Springis-Doss, R. "Anoka-Henepin School District Schedule Study Preliminary Report, August 1995." Minneapolis, Minn.: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, 1995.
31.
Newmann, F.M., and Wehlage, G.G.Successful School Restructuring. Madison, Wis. : Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin , 1995.
32.
Nishi, Shannon. Class Size: The Issue for Policymakers in the State ofUtah . Salt Lake City: Utah State Office of Education, 1990. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321410)
33.
O'Neil, J. "Finding Time To Learn." Educational Leadership3(1995): 11-15.
34.
Pulaski County High School. "Pulaski County High School 1995-96 Goals." Dublin, Va.: Author, 1995.
35.
Rachar, B.; Rice, E.T.; and Stennett, R.G.Retention of Mathematics Knowledge in Semestered and Non-Semestered Programmes over the End of Grade 9 to Beginning of Grade 10 Interval. London, Ontario: London Board of Education , 1973.
36.
Raphael, Dennis, and Wahlstrom, Merlin. "The Semestered Secondary School and Student Achievement: Results from the Second Ontario International Science Study." Canadian Journal of Education2( 1986): 180-83.
37.
Raphael, Dennis; Wahlstrom, Merlin; and McLean, L.D. "Debunking the Semestering Myth."Canadian Journal of Education1(1986): 36-52.
38.
Reid, W.M. "The Copernican Timetable and Mathematics: Grade 12 Exam Results at L.V. Rogers Secondary School." Vector, Spring 1994.
39.
—. "Restructuring Secondary Schools with Extended Time Blocks and Intensive Courses: The Experiences of School Administrators in British Columbia." Doctoral dissertation, Gonzaga University, British Columbia, 1995a.
40.
—. "Restructuring a Secondary School with Extended Time Blocks and Intensive Learning" Nelson, British Columbia: Unpublished manuscript, 1995b.
41.
Ross, J.A. "An Evaluation of Timetable Innovation in Ontario." Canadian Journal of Education4( 1977): 23-35.
42.
Roy J.Wasson High School. "3/95 Before/After Data Comparisons." Colorado Springs, Colo.: Author, 1995.
43.
Salvaterra, M., and Adams, D. "Departing from Tradition: Two Schools' Stories." Educational Leadership3(1995): 32-33.
—. "The New School on the Block." The Executive Educator , August 1995b.
46.
Seely, C. "Changing the Mathematics We Teach." In Prospects for School Mathematics , edited by I. M. Carl.Reston, Va.: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1995.
47.
Sessoms, J.C. "Teachers' Perceptions of Three Models of High School Block Scheduling." Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 1995.
48.
Sharman, R.G. "Student Dropouts and Scheduling Patterns in Secondary Schools: An Exploratory Study." Alberta Journal of Educational Research4(1990): 325-36.
49.
Sigurdson, S.E.Semestering in Vancouver Schools. Edmonton, Alberta : AlbertaDept. of Education , 1982 . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 225 946)
50.
Smythe, P.G.; Stennett, R.G.; and Rachar, B.Long-Term Retention of Numeric and Algebraic Skills in Semestered and Non-Semestered Programmes. London, Ontario: London Board of Education, 1974. (Micromedia Limited Use Microlog order No. ON00774)
51.
Stennett, R. G. Semestering: Effects on Student Attitudes and Achievement. London, Ontario : London Board of Education, 1985 . (Micromedia Limited Use Microlog order No. ONO4949)
52.
Stennett, R.G., and Rachar, B.Gains in Mathematics Knowledge in Grade 10 Semestered and Non-Semestered Programmes . London, Ontario: London Board of Education, 1973. (Micromedia Limited Use Microlog order No. ON00775)
53.
Stevens, R.S.Semestering in Vancouver Schools. Vancouver, British Columbia : Vancouver Board of School Trustees, 1976. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 131 556)
54.
Sturgis, J. "Teacher Opinions About Block Scheduling." Unpublished manuscript, 1995.
55.
Usiskin, Z. "Block Scheduling and the Teaching of Mathematics." Scott Foresman Newsletter USCM Perspectives11(1995): 7-10.
56.
Watts, Gary D., and Castle, Shari. "The Time Dilemma in School Restructuring." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1992 . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 708)
57.
Wideen, M.F.; O'Shea, T.; Pye, I.; Sherwood, A.; and Ivany, G.Impact of Large-Scale Testing on the Instructional Activity of Science Teachers . Burnaby, B.C.: Institute for Studies in Teacher Education, 1991.
58.
Williams, M.F. "The Trimester Scheduling Plan: Flexibility in the High School Curriculum ." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of School Administrators, Atlanta, Ga., February 1985. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 266 553)
