Many middle grade schools use teaming or other organizational models to create smaller teaching and learning units. The value of such struc tures lies in the conditions that result when teachers and students engage in thoughtful, collaborative work that affects the success of middle level students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, W., and George, P.The Exemplary Middle School. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1981.
2.
Arhar, J. "Enhancing Students' Feelings of School Membership: What Principals Can Do." Schools in the Middle3(1992): 12-16.
3.
Ashton, P., and Webb, R.Making a Differernce: Teacher's Sense of Efficacy and Student Achievement . New York: Longman, 1986.
4.
Ashton, P.; Webb, R.; and Doda, N.A Study of Teachers' Sense of Efficacy. Final Report, Volume I. Gainesville: University of Florida, 1982. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 231 834.)
5.
Barris, N. "A Comparative Study of the Michigan Educational Assessment Program Results Between Selected Traditional Junior High Schools and Middle Schools in the State To Determine the Organizational Structure in Which Grade 7 Students Are Most Successful." Dissertation Abstracts International , 54, 34-A, 1992.
6.
California Department of Education.Implementation of Middle Grades Reforms in California Public Schools. Sacramento, Calif.: DOE, 1993.
7.
Epstein, J., and Mac Iver, D.Education in the Middle Grades: National Practices and Trends. Columbus, Ohio: National Middle School Association , 1990.
8.
Erb, T., and Doda, N. Team Organization : Promise—Practices and Possibilities . Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1989.
9.
Gatewood, T.E.; Cline, G.; Green, G.; and Harris, S.E. "The Middle School Interdisciplinaiy Team Organization and Its Relationship to Teacher Stress." Research in Middle LevelEducation2(1992): 27-40.
10.
Lee, V.E., and Smith, J.B. "Effects of School Restructuring on the Achievement and Engagement of Middle-Grades Students." Sociology of Education3(1993): 164-87.
11.
Lee, V.E.; Dedrick, R.F.; and Smith, J.B. "The Effects of the Social Organization of Schools on Teachers' Efficacy and Satisfaction." Sociology of Education3(1991): 190-208.
12.
Lewis, A.Changing the Odds: Middle School Reform in Progress, 1991-1993. New York: The Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, 1993.
13.
McLaughlin, M.; Talbert, J.; Kahne, J.; and Powell, J. "Constructing a Personalized School Environment." Phi Delta Kappan3(1990): 230-35.
14.
Mills, R.A.; Powell, R.R.; and Pollack, J.P. "The Influence of Interdisciplinary Teaming on Teacher Isolation: A Case Study." Research in Middle LevelEducation2(1992): 9-26.
15.
Myers, R. "A Comparison of Academic Achievement of Middle Schools and Junior High Schools on the Idaho Proficiency Examination and Iowa Test of Basic Skills." Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3607-A, 1988 .
16.
Newmann, F.M.; Rutter, R.A.; and Smith, M.A. "Organizational Factors that Affect School Sense of Efficacy, Community, and Expectations." Sociology of Education4(1989): 221-38.
17.
Raudenbush, S.W.; Rowan, B.; and Cheong, Y.F. "Contextual Effects on the Self-Perceived Efficacy of High School Teachers." Sociology of Education2(1992): 150-67.
18.
Rosenholtz, S.Teucher's Workplace: The Social Organization of Schools. New York: Longman, 1989.
19.
Rutter, M.; Maughan, B.; Mortimore, P.; Ouston, J.; and Smith, A.Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press , 1979.
20.
Valentine, J.; Clark, D.; Irvin, J.; Keefe, J.; and Melton, G.Leadership in Middle Level Education: Vol. 1: A National Survey of Middle Level Leaders and Schools. Reston, Va.: National Association of Secondary School Principals, 1993 .
21.
Wehlage, G.G.; Rutter, R.A.; Smith, G.A.; Lesko, N.; and Fernandez, R.R.Reducing the Risk: Schools as Communities of Support. New York: Falmer, 1989.
