Battelle Memorial Institute.The Office of Economic Opportunity Experiment in Educational Performance Contracting, Research Report. Columbus, Ohio: The Institute , 1972.
2.
Carson, Charles C.; Huelskamp, Robert M.; and Woodall, Thomas D.Perspective on Education in America. Final Draft . Albuquerque, N.Mex.: Sandia National Laboratories, April 1992.
3.
Center for Educational Research and Innovation.Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1993.
4.
Educational Testing Service.Adult Literacy in America. National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, 1993.
5.
National Commission on Excellence in Education.A Nation at Risk. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 1983.
6.
NationalCommission on the Reform of Secondary Education. The Reform of Secondary Education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.
7.
NationalPanel on High School and Adolescent Education. The Education of Adolescents. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education, 1976.
8.
Panel on Youth of the President's Science Advisory Committee.Youth: Transition to Adulthood. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1974.
9.
RAND Corporation.Case Studies in Educational Performance Contracting, Vols. 1-6. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 1971.
10.
Report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (England).Children and Their Primary Schools ("The Plowden Report") . London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1967.
11.
Rotberg, Iris. "Myths in International Comparisons of Science and Mathematics Achievement ." The Bridge, Fall 1991.
12.
Tanner, Daniel. "A Nation 'Truly' at Risk." Phi Delta Kappan, December 1993.
13.
—. "Performance Contracting: Contrivance of the Industrial-Governmental-Educational Complex." Intellect, March 1973.
14.
U.S. Department of Education.America 2000: An Education Strategy. Washington, D.C.: USDOE, 1991.