Barnard, C.I.The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UniversityPrinting Office, 1938.
2.
Bolman, L.G., and Deal, T.F.Modem Approaches to Understanding and Managing Organizations. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 1984.
3.
Crowson, R.L., and Porter-Gehrie, C. "The Discretionary Behavior of Principals in Large-City Schools." Educational Administration Quarterly , 1980.
4.
Day, R., and Day, J.V. "A Review of the Current State of Negotiated Order Theory: An Appreciation and a Critique" The Sociological Quarterly, Winter 1977.
5.
Flanagan, J.C. "The Critical Incident Technique." Psychological Bulletin51(1954):327-58.
6.
. " Defining the Requirements of an Executive's Job." Personnel8(1951): 2835.
7.
Gronn, P.C. "Talk as Work: The Accomplishment of School Administration." Administrative Science Quarterly28( 1983): 1-21.
8.
Hoyle, E. "Micropolitics of Educational Organizations." Educational Management and Administration10( 1982): 87-98.
9.
—. The Politics of School Management. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1986.
10.
Koontz, H. "The Management Theory Jungle Revisited." Academy of Management Review2(1980): 175-87.
11.
Morris, V.C.; Crowson, R. L.; Porter-Gehrie, C.; and Hurwitz, E., Jr. Principals in Action. The Reality of Managing Schools. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1984.
12.
Noblit, G.W. "The Legacy of Education in the Social Sciences: The Case of Organizational Theory." Issues in Education1(1986): 42-51.
13.
Peters, T.J., and Waterman, R.In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper and Row, 1982.